Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fuel Protest


JOSH_IOU
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Strike or no strike, there is too much tax on fuel.

 

I say we pick a day, and on that day everyone posts the shirt from their back to Gordon Brown. Write on the shirt an agreed standard comment about the tax on fuel. That should send the message.

 

And if you don't want to send your own shirt, buy one from a charity shop and help a good cause at the same time.

 

Just a thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree that something has to be done. I am spending between £70-£90 per week in petrol. Im happy to display posters in the car, at work, etc. as for sending the shirt off my back, the government might se it as bribary. I work for a large local authority and will be speaking to the local MP's and directing them towards this link for their views. They are of the same mindset as us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The dearest petrol in the country so far announced on tv - Exeter £1.99 per ltr petrol and diesel.

 

Blatant profiteering. Says he is doing ti to stop people buying too much. All he has to do is tell the pump not to deliver more that £20 (or whatever). He refused to appear on camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If there are any truckers from todays london go-slow that wish to be involved in a Dover Blockade get intouch.

 

 

Its quite clear from the government they do not wish to bring the price of fuel down any time soon.

 

Enough's enough.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst surfing the net the other day, doing a bit of background reading petrol prices and the like I came across an interesting page from the AA detailing petrol prices from 1896 to 2005 here.

 

Its no help in fighting the cause but does have severla points of interest (note that prices prior to 1971 are given in old money and all arre price per gallon (divide by 4.5 to get price per litre)).

 

A few salient points are:

 

In 1896 petrol was 4p/gallon or just 0.008p per litre. That means (if im doing my maths right) that petrol has increased by 1474900% (1.4 million) :eek: in just 112 years. If there were to be a similar increase over the next 112 years then petrol would be 1740382p/L (or £17403/L) in the year 2120

 

Fuel duty was not introduced until 1909, was then suspended in 1919 (when VED was introduced) and re-introduced in 1928.

 

Petrol doubled in price during the Great War 2p/L to 4p/L but by the start of WWII had dropped back down to 2p/L

 

Petrol was 11p/L in the year I was born but rocketed to 16p/L the following year (45 % increase). Conspiracy theorists might say that I was directly responsible for this.

 

In 1998 83.1% of the cost of fuel was tax compared to 57% today

 

skb

Edited by skbuncks
spelling

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...