Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate the time that has gone into replying. I have read so much about this tonight that hopefully I can be a step ahead.  If I gain a reply from the head office I shall let you guys know. 
    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax 2nd claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5906 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Some time ago i used this forum to claim back unfair bank charges with the Halifax, not taking me seriously i then went to the financial ombudsman service who succesfully got me £1200 of unfair charges for the last 2 years.

I would now like to claim for £210 worth over the last 2 months but I heard a rumour that Halifax has now frozen all action regarding this matter (while their lawyers desperatly try and get them out of it). Does anyone know if this is true and should I continue to claim my charges?

thanks for reading and thanks in advance

Z

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zombola

Yes you can still claim your charges,same process as before,send your sar,but if you have your statements send your prelim,it may take longer this time round due

to the test case but your claim will be in the system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tilly, thats very reassuring. i've sent off my prelim with statements and spreadsheet. Hopefully because its a realitvely small amount they'll pay out without fuss. you never know though.

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

I had a prompt reply from the Halifax stating that they have indeed frozen any action regarding reclaiming overdraft charges until they settle it in court.

 

here is the said letter.

 

2293404701_82174f1051_b.jpg

2294195846_425144da9e_b.jpg

 

Does anyone have any advice on what to do next? Should I wait it out or is this another fob off?

At this stage when I succesfully claimed last time after my first response from the Halifax I then got in touch with the Financial Ombudsman service however the letter states that they too will tell me the same answer. Does anyone know if this is correct?

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tilly

Ive filled the N1 form in upto where you put the charges and court fees etc.

is this a formal way of saying 'Im taking you to court' and/or do you think it will come to that?

I dont have a solicitor and do you know where I can find out how much the court fees are?

Thank you

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

When you submit your N1 to your local county court,then yes you are taking them to court to reclaim your charges. You will need 3 copies of your N1 your Poc and 3 copies of your spreadsheet.below is how you fill the rest of your N1 out.

claimant You

 

Defendant

 

halifax

 

Brief details of claim

Money claim for return of penalty charges

applied to the claimants bank account by the

defeendant

 

Value

Charges xxxxxx

interest under s69 county courts act 1984 xxxxxxx

Total xxxxxx

SAR - (Subject access Request) Fee.....£10.00

 

 

right hand corner

Amount claimed xxxxx

court fee if applicable

solicitors cost leave blank (you dont't need one)

Total amount xxxxx

 

 

Court Fees - Do you have to pay them?

 

County Court fees and exemptions

 

 

 

Tilly

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi. my 1st post on these forums. i have a few questions and think this thread is the best place since the OP is in a similar situation to me...

 

1 - i claimed about £1800 back and received it in April 2007. since then i have incurred about £1000 of further charges. am i eligible to claim for a 2nd time?

 

2 - any idea when htis court case ruling will be made? April? May? December :) ?

 

3 - when it is made.... any idea % wise of the chances of the judge ruling that bank charges are allowed to be reclaimed?

 

ok thanks to anyone for any advice that may be forthcoming. Nick. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nick and welcome to the forum

 

Yes you can reclaim your charges back a second time.

 

at the moment there is no outcome of the test case

 

nobody know's what the decission will be

 

It is in your best interest to have your own thread,that way you will get

all the help you will need. click on the link to start a new thread.

 

newthread.gif

 

Tilly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...