Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
    • I am reading the thread now and think although its probably very similar to my predicament,  I have no way of obtaining the terms anymore due to MyParcelDelivery having being dissolved and their website not being active now. I have nothing to quote from and they didn't send me a copy at the time of order, the website that I believe they reinvented themselves as P4D has terms I am looking at now but however similar they may be I wont be able to quote from them in this case. Thanks 
    • Thankyou for your reply jk2054 thats put my mind at ease regarding going forward, appreciate your help.   Thanks Bankfodder, I will look over that thread now. In regards to the further info: Item was a jacket, value £995.00 and was declared correctly Item was fully insured to the value and £995.00 declared correctly  Item was sent on 03/02/23 Thanks  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5929 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, my brother has attended court for a CCJ, in scotland, the judge basically told Black Horse and himself to sort it out between themselves. a month later and the sheriff officers have been at his door demanding payment. he is currently out the country for a month and i have used a templet on here to offer them £50 a month, and if they cashed the cheque this agreement would stand. they cashed the cheque. as i was acting on his behalf after saying he was out the country for a month they have written back saying that as he has given no authoriation for me to act on his behalf then they will not discuss any details (which i understand) they have also said the cheque which he sent them (it was actually a chq with my name on it).

 

black horse have rejected the £50 even after cashing the cheque. within the letter i sent them was " i enclose a chq for £50 on behalf of "mr ???`s" behalf on the understanding that if this is accepted this will be his monthly payment from now on, with all interest frozen on the account so he can pay the actual debt off.

 

when the sheriff officers had been to his house i had called them explaining he was out the country for a month and i was acting on his behalf, they explained that i should write a letter explaning this and the offer of payment. my bro is back in a couple of weeks and would like to know what he does from here, they have threatened further legal action and they are looking for a substantial payment proposal.

 

sorry about the long post but im at a loss what to do to help him get this set up for the £50 a month. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

im unsure thats what my bro said lol. he offered them £50 at the court and they rejected it at the court as well. i think the judge wasnt really interested as he had probable seen that many people that day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay ill tell him to phone the court and find out on his return. knowing my wee bro he hasnt told me all the facts. its seems as if hes got debts upon debts coming in and aint doing anything about them. but im trying to help him out as best i can and with the help of this site

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's exactly what I assumed...

 

Sit him down and get him to list all (and I mean ALL) his debts. Then we can start to look at which ones are enforeable and which aren't. You need a copy of that court order though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Edz states we can't advise until we know what the decree (the scottish equivalent of a ccj) stated. Currently it is unsure whether one was even granted - although if sheriff officers are involved it is highly likely that one was.

 

They are correct in that they can not discuss the matter with you as this would be in breach of the Data Protection Act unless they have a document from your brother authorising you to act on his behalf.

 

Also we would need to know the details of the debt (as it's Black Horse it's likely to be some sort of loan). Once we know these details we can start to look at what options are open to your brother.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi, my bro has now returned from his holiday. yes the black horse was for a loan. Spoke to him and he said he had offered £50 at the court hearing. the judge said it was a bit low but he enphasised that was all he could afford and the judge told them to sort it out between themselves. he has now written to the company offering the £50 and i have advised him to send another chq for £50 for the 1st March. he has several other debts one to scottish power for £829 which they have passed to a debt collection agency and they are threatening court proceddings etc. do i cca them. would it be advisable for him to change his electricity company at this stage. they have also said that following the letter a debt collector will be attending his home at the cost of £35.

 

he also has 2 other debts 1 to lloyds tsb and one to RBS (about 5 years old) these are both with fredrickson Int ltd. i have cca`d them and with regards to one of the debts they have acknowledged his letter but they have asked him to phone them asap. i have advised him not to.

 

at this stage he has given me his bank card and he only wants a minimum amount of his wages every week so i can sort his debts out for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For starters, Sheriff officers can't enforce CCJ's in Scotland, or vice versa, so check the facts there. With regards to the amount, you most likely applied for a variation order (where the judge rules the amount you pay etc) - If this was thrown out, it was because the judge didn't need to rule how much money was owed. He has probably therefore told you to send your own proposals to the sheriffs (i.e sort it out yourself).

 

Remember a sheriff can reject your offer on the basis that the claimants aren't happy. Therefore make sure when you send them your offer, you include a finance breakdown.

 

As your his other debts, pretty clean cut really, don't pay them and judgement will be issued, or they'll be passed to a collection agency who can write their own fee scale pretty much.

 

Also don't ring anyone, write only.

 

You should be able to act on his behalf as long as you get a letter of authority to the companies. (Signed by your brother)

 

NOTE - The only reason the sheriff wants you to write that your brother's out of town is so they can report it to the claimants and get it closed (as they prob think they won't get any money!) - hence they get an abortive fee.

 

Also, remember sheriffs can take further action if the matter is not paid. If they're involved - there is definately a CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he has several other debts one to scottish power for £829 which they have passed to a debt collection agency and they are threatening court proceddings etc. do i cca them. would it be advisable for him to change his electricity company at this stage. they have also said that following the letter a debt collector will be attending his home at the cost of £35.

 

This debt is not covered by the CCA and the DCA can't lawfully add the collection charges to the account.

 

There are a number of energy trust funds available, unfortunately Scottish Power seem to be one of the few who give grants to projects rather than individuals (the trusts were set up to help people out of fuel poverty). There may be a grant available to your brother to help him pay his fuel bill. Your local CAB will know if there is one available and, if there is, should have the appropriate forms to fill in to apply.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all, can i have some help urgently. i cca`d 2 debts that my brother was being chased for from fredrickson ltd. now letters have came from bryan carter about these. one they have acknowledged his lloyds tsb debt and it is currently on hold and the other 2 rbs they are threatening court action. now i have checked royal mail and the RBS was signed for (no electronic proof as yet). he has until the 28th to repond. the chq for the rbs one has not been cashed. do i cca Bryan carter? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi, following a letter to bryan carter and co saying that the account was in dispute etc etc, they have now passed the debt to Apex (formerly BCW group) and have sent it to my mothers address. i called up as if i was my mum and informed them that he did not stay there, they asked what his address was and i said i would`nt give it out as they should no that information as the previous company fredrickson ltd had been cca`d and they should have all the information. i also said that if they proceeded to send letters to (my mothers address) then i would be cotnacting trading standards about them. they are now by there 12+2 days and heading fast to the 30days. what do i do now, do i sit it out until the 30days is up and then take all my informtion to trading standards even though they have moved the debt to another company. still waiting for the credit agreement.

 

an update on the CCJ black horse, we sent a chq away for £50 as promised when we 1st contacted them and they have cashed it. they have now cashed 2 chq for £50 and black horse have personally written to him saying this isnt enough. would a covering letter be suitable to say this is all he can afford at the moment and will review in one years time at a possiblity of increasing the amount and enclose his finacial expenditure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my brother received a notification through his door from the sheriff officers saying he has not to sell anything in in house and he has not to sell his house re his CCJ vs black horse. black horse had written back to him saying the £50 was not enough but have also sent a pay in book. they have now cashed 2 x£50 chqs. where does he stand on this. we are going to go and see trading standards today for help on this as i seem to be getting nowhere and dont no how to help him next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...