Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5931 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i recieved a letter today from a bailiff company with regards to council taxFor £232

I cannot work due to my illness and as im on benefits the council pay my rent and council tax they say it is what is owed as i do not get full council tax relief ok thats fair phoned them to make a payment they say have to phone the bailiff to arrange it then she said as you are disablied i will do (lovely lady )so she phoned back told me they will take £20 a month a thanksed her and phoned the bailiff was told yes council have phoned them and arranged a payment plan i thanked them and asked may i make a payment she told me off what account i asked her what she was on about as ive only had one letter about this acount from her comapny she said there was a account from 16 months ago and that a baliff came out and hand delevered a letter to me i told her that was not true she told me ok he must have put it through you letterbox as you have a brown door(this is true it is brown) but i int got a letterbox as the dog used to eat everything that came through there thats why when i had a new door i didnt get a letterbox(postman knows where to hide my mail in the garden)

what can i do about this as she told me the 2 will now be added together and that payment will come off the 2 accounts

so any help as i know nothing about this other account and she got really uptight when i told her she just said well he must have come as how do we know you have a brown door i told her there was nothing to say that he might have just drove pass

so i just said ok i could drive up to your office and say i came in and paid i must have because your office as a glass door and blinds in the window

plaese help me sort this out

regards

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you say you were on benefits?

Do you already get Council Tax Benefit?

 

if so it's got bog all to do with the bailiffs.

The council must apply for an attachment order to take it out of your benefit at approximately 300 pence per week.

 

Does that apply to you?

 

if so, you'll be sorted in no time.

 

Been there done that,

 

Chris.8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris Thanks for the reply

yes i got coucil tax benefit and found out that i still had to pay 132.00 towards my council tax only found this out when they sent me a letter from the court

so i wrote to the council asking them to take money each fortnight out of my benefit

then i get a letter from baliff company so i phoned (today) the council to ask them to take it out of my benefit they told me that they cant take it out of Incapacity Benifet and i would have to deal with the baliffs so the council women phoned them and said that she had setup a payment plan with them for me to pay £5 a week

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yes i still have to pay £132 a year instead of £1100 im on Incapacity Benefit and DLA and when i phoned the baliff to ask how i owed it they told me need phone council thats when i asked the lady again from the council to take it out of my IB or DLA she told me they cant only income support or JSA thats when she told me to hang on while she phoned the baliff company (direct line i suppose cuz she was back in mins when i phone was waiting ages) and told me that she arrangedd a payment plan for me with them of £20.00 a month but hell when i phoned the baliff just now to pay they charge a £1 for debit cards

sods

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so 132 per annum = 13.20 per month over 10 months = 3.30 per week.

 

I don't believe for one minute that they can only attach an order to IS or JSA, unless someone knows better.

 

Why can't the council accept the payments in instalments from you direct especially as the debt for each year could easily be cleared within the year.

 

I think you need to stop making phone calls.

 

Start writing letters.

 

chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks chrissi

I will write to the council and deliver it first thing tomorrow

I cant see why they wont take payment off me

what i do know is that the company that collect it for the council do a better job than when the council had there own baliffs as the company they use are known to bully people but NOT ME SINCE I FOUND THIS WEBSITE

REGARDS C

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

deductions can only be made from income support, income-based jobseekers allowance or pension credit – people in receipt of income-replacement benefits such as incapacity benefit cannot have deductions from their benefit for council tax arrears.

 

OK I believe it now:(.

 

I am sure that the council have a provision for instalment agreements that can be paid within the year, I've seen it somewhere, GOTCHA!.

Council Tax Payments - Instalments & Payments

 

Payment of Council Tax is due on demand on the 1st April each year, but council's are obliged to offer a statutory instalment plan (maximum 10 instalments) to customers.

 

So you know what to write now don't you!:-D

 

Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the women from the baliff company told me they have one for the £232 and another one from last year for £500 odd that i know nothing about so she told me that they would add the two together

Funny as the women from the council this morning didnt mention anything about the £500 odd one

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

The quick way is: to get yourself down to the council tax offices and make them print off the actual debt to them, or get them to show you what's on the computer screen and write it down.

Or write to them, and ask them to post it out to you a.s.a.p, because you really haven't got 40 days to wait for a S.A.R.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deduction from benefits ONLY apply when you are in receipt of EITHER jobseekers (JSA) or pension credit.

 

The following is from our website:

 

 

 

 

If you are receiving Income Support, it is vitally important that you contact your local authority without delay. This is because they can apply for deductions to be made at a nominal rate from your benefits to pay towards your arrears of Council Tax. The amount of deduction is set by law at £2.90 per week for a single debtor and £4.55 per week for a couple.

The relevant Statutory Regulation is as follows:

 

• Council Tax (Deductions from Income Support) Regulations 1993 S.I. 1993/494.

 

If payments are being deducted from your Benefits, under Regulation 52 of The Council Tax (Administration & Enforcement) Regulations 1992, it expressly prohibits any enforcement action when deductions are being made from Income Support for a Council Tax Liability Order.

 

From 6th October 2003, anyone in receipt of Pension Credit may also apply for Council Tax to be deducted at nominal rate of £2.80 per week.

 

The relevant Statutory Regulation is as follows:

 

 

• The State Pension Credit (Consequential, Transitional and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2002 – S.I.2002/3019

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

what are my rights with regards to these companies contacting me as i suffer from metal health issues (PTSD) surley these people have some laws to protect vunrable people

any help

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

What angers me is that the council, knowing that you are on benefits, have still applied for a liability order and would have charged you fees of approx: £85 for this. A disgrace !!

 

According to the National Standards you are classified as "vulnerable"

You need to write to the council to ask them why your debt was sent to bailiffs and that you are vulnerable and the debt should be returned back to the council ASAP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...