Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • tell her to simply ignore all the harassment and laugh at them.  
    • you dont need to hide times dates and £figures can you please type the POC out in full not your abridged version above. dx  
    • you mean you've done AOS? not filed a defence yet? dx  
    • Rather than dsunaks lies, lets look at the reaL Data and real black holes in the UKs budget - all created by the poop Tories   Public sector finances, UK: April 2024   Main points Borrowing – the difference between public sector spending and income – was (a black hole of) £20.5 billion in JUST April 2024, the fourth highest April borrowing since monthly records began in 1993. Borrowing in April 2024 was £1.5 billion more than in April 2023 and £1.2 billion more than the £19.3 billion forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Public sector receipts grew by £1.6 billion compared with April 2023, however, this growth was outstripped by a £3.1 billion increase in spending over the same period. Since our March 2024 publication, we have increased our initial estimate of borrowing in the financial year ending March 2024 by £0.8 billion to £121.4 billion, now £7.3 billion more than the £114.1 billion forecast by the OBR. Public sector net debt excluding public sector banks (debt) at the end of April 2024 was provisionally estimated at 97.9% of gross domestic product (GDP); this was 2.5 percentage points more than at the end of April 2023, and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s. Excluding the Bank of England, debt was 89.9% of GDP, 8.0 percentage points lower than the wider debt measure. Public sector net worth excluding public sector banks was in deficit by £703.4 billion at the end of April 2024, a £93.5 billion larger deficit than at the end of April 2023.     and the Tory legacy of financial mismanagement  to be passed on :   UK government debt 2023 | Statista WWW.STATISTA.COM Government debt in the United Kingdom reached over 2.25 trillion British pounds in 2022/23, compared with 1.83 trillion pounds in... - and graph does NOT show the increases as it should  
    • yep. if they send no paperwork by the time mediation comes to be able to make an informed decision upon mediation..you refuse it. keep reading up here dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CANCELLATION/ADMIN CHARGE - Is this LEGAL ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5975 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There is a 14 day cooling-off period for people buying personal insurance. So charging a cancellation fee for a policy which hasn't come into force yet wouldn't be legal, so long as you bought the policy less than 14 days ago.

 

However, if the policy cover has already started then I think you can be charged a cancellation fee, even if you cancel it within the first 14 days. In that case you would be charged for the proportion of the cover you used as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The policy is due for renewal on 26th January and I've told them to lapse it but they want to charge a fee because they sent have already send the docs out......I never told them to renew it but because it is on DD it is on an automatic renewal unless told otherwise.......I AM telling them otherwise but they still want to charge a fee to lapse it basically

 

This is totally unethical in my opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you bought your policy from an intermediary rather than direct? I don't know quite so much about how intermediaries operate, but I think they do sometimes charge fees when a direct insurer wouldn't. On the documents they originally gave you, there should be a list of all the fees that the intermediary charges. Is the cancellation charge listed on there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know as it was insured by a Leaseholder who has forwarded me those docs........I will just write to the FOS and request this be looked into as Insurers or brokers shouldn't charge a fee to Lapse a policy as the contract has run its course

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they are using excuses not to refund.

 

Last year I've had similar problem Adrain flux who asked for photos of my car and copies of the driving licence which took ten days to arrange and post back before they decided to ask fro an extra £100 or cancel my policy!

 

Now again this year I've again been sold an incorrect policy and even though it was spotted before the last insurance ran out and the new one issued the Post Office is claiming the order is in the system and they can't cancel it until I send the cover note back or pay them more moeny!

 

I'm of the opinion it's a [problem] and I've kept all my evidence this year and will take them to court if they try make a cancelation charge out of it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tractor girl,

 

Who is the Broker?

 

You do not have to pay this charge - they are just trying it on. You are not cancelling the policy if it hasn't come into force, you are lapsing it.

 

Stick to your guns and refuse to pay - nake sure you have taken out new cover from the date that the old one expires - you may ned this to prove that the old policy wasn't needed.

 

Let us know how you get on.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...