Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

who can place a charge on a property?


maybelline
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I read somewhere (cant find it now) that only a qualified solicitor can place a charge on the register of title to a property, is this correct and when I say charge I do not mean the kind given by a Court, just secured loan. also, is it actually necessary to place this on a title deed if only a secured loan (of less than 25k)?

 

if any legal types can help would be appreciated:)

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

only a secured loan (of less than 25k)? this is what i have on my thread may my charge is under the MORGAN STANLEYVHFO thread i have put my contract in their for peeps to cast a more knowladgable eye over mine but to dat i am waiting for it to be looked at ,so sadly i cant help but it will be interesting to hear replies

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

May, a secured loan acts in the same way as a mortgage in that the laon is secured on your property in the form of a charge - placed on the title deeds by a legally qualified solicitor.

 

Secured loans are basically mortgages too, called "second" mortgages.

 

The way the charge system works is that all chargees are tiered - if you have a mortgage they are first charge, then you get a secured loan and they are second charge.

 

If the property gets repossed, any money paid for it will first be used to pay the balance of the first charge (mortgage), then if there is still any money left, the second charge (secured loan) and the the third, fourth, five charge (if applicable). Once all the chargees are paid, you get the remaining balance if there is any. If there is none left after the first charge is paid then no one else gets their money.

 

The reason interest rates are high with secured loans is because they are not necessarily guaranteed to get their money back. The secured loan company have to get permission from the chargees above them to secure a charge as well.

 

I hope this helps!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks thats very helpful, another question, should I have a copy of the 'instruction' or whatever form it should take, I imagine they do not just ring them and say, oh by the way, can we have a second charge and then to land registry similarly?

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would assume that you have to give your consent - your mortgage company should have sight of this and so shoudl the solicitors.

 

Otherwise, I (or anyone else) could get a secured loan on your property and you would never know!!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

well yes, any alleged secured loan I suppose would give permission but I did know that a person taking out such a loan would actually involve recording something on to the title deed in the form of an instruction, since one does not use a solicitor to take out a secured loan, are they then instructed by the creditor to contact land registry.

 

this 'placing' is the thing I was after?

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

well yes, any alleged secured loan I suppose would give permission but I did know that a person taking out such a loan would actually involve recording something on to the title deed in the form of an instruction, since one does not use a solicitor to take out a secured loan, are they then instructed by the creditor to contact land registry.

 

this 'placing' is the thing I was after?

 

My understanding is that the secured loan company use a solicitor to place the charge on the property.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Un1boy,

 

To clarify a point above. Up to and including £15000, a 'second charge' finance company does NOT need to get the permission of the principal mortgage company.

 

Just gone through this personally. My mortgage service company denied me the ability to secure a second charge for more than this figure as I have had arrears in the last 3 months on the mortgage account. Millstone Mortgage Services of High Wycombe are certainly not my Preferred mortgage Company! Lol

 

Had to reduce my further borrowing and plough ahead! Heyho.

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks for clarifying Helford - I'm no expert on this.

 

Sorry for the problems you have experienced.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following link may be of some use Mortgages of land

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is some confusion here.

 

 

A “secured loan” is simply a loan that is secured. The security does not necessarily have to be land. It can be shares, an interest under a trust, the goodwill of a business or a painting. Of course when finance companies advertise “secured loans” they expect that the security will be land.

 

 

When it comes to land, there is in theory a distinction between “mortgages” and “charges”. A mortgage gives the lender an interest in land, but a charge only gives rights. (In fact, all mortgages are charges, but not all charges are mortgages.) In the context of what is being discussed in this thread, all charges and secured loans are mortgages.

 

 

The word “mortgage” is used to mean:

 

 

  1. A type of security - “I have a mortgage on my property.”
  2. The deed executed to create such a security - “My solicitor has sent me the mortgage to sign.”
  3. The loan itself - “I am applying for a mortgage.”

 

Virtually all mortgages of land are “charges by way of legal mortgage”, usually shortened to “legal charge” and often simply referred to as “mortgage”. So, a first mortgage (typically to a building society or bank and usually called “a mortgage”) and a second mortgage (typically to a finance company and referred to variously as “a second mortgage/charge” or “a secured loan”) both create exactly the same type of security – the only distinction between them being the question of which has priority.

 

 

Whether the consent of the first lender is required before you can create a second mortgage depends not on the amount owed to the first lender or the amount to be borrowed from the second lender, but on whether the terms of the mortgage to the first lender require consent to be given.

 

 

All that is required to create a mortgage is to sign a mortgage deed. Additionally, for the mortgage to take effect as security it may need to be registered. There is no need to employ a solicitor either to draw up the mortgage or register it, though only a solicitor (and certain other professionals) may charge a fee for doing so. In practice, all commercial lenders employ professional conveyancers or have their own legal department to ensure that everything is done properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...