Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate the time that has gone into replying. I have read so much about this tonight that hopefully I can be a step ahead.  If I gain a reply from the head office I shall let you guys know. 
    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Endownment Shortfall-help???


craigten
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5909 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

Im making a claim for an Edownment shortfall, this is my draft letter, please can anyone help me with 2 things:

1, Is there anything i should add/delete? (please feel free to edit it wherever you like!)

2, What sort of time limit should i give them? (bank charges was 14 days then 7 days i think?)

ALL advice would be greatly appreciated, Thankyou!!!:|

 

1st January 2008

Dear Sirs,

Re Mortgage Endowment Plan.

Policy no.

Dear Sirs

I am making a strong complaint regarding the above Endowment Plan which was misold to me on 31.08.1988

This is for the reasons listed below.

This being my first Endowment mortgage I trusted your Manager at Barclays, XXXXX to give me trusted advice and to have both mine and the banks best interests at heart. This is seems was not the case at all.

I came with my wife to see your then manager, Mr XXX at XXXX because I was struggling with my repayments on my repayment mortgage I held with you at the time.

I was on Social security and invalidity benefit at the time ( and indeed is still the case)

I was advised by Mr XXX to change to an Endowment Mortgage plan as this would, he said solve my problems, as the Social security would pay the interest on this and all I would have to find were the Insurance premiums and he told me that this would be beneficial to me.

He said he would arrange for a Barclays Insurance representative to call at my home to talk to me about this is the near future which he did. Obviously him being a Barclays bank manager, I believed his advice would be in my best interests.

The agent called and his name was XXXXX ……… (I will find out his complete name) but it will be on your records anyway.

I was told by him that “Not only would it pay my mortgage off but I would also have a lump sum extra, and my only problem would be thinking how to spend it”

At NO TIME during his visit did he ever mention there was any risk involved, in fact he went on to say that no Endowment had ever failed to pay a mortgage off.

He was extremely bullish about the projected performance of the policy.

He knew of my financial circumstances and also knew that the policy ran well into my retirement and no discussion over how I would continue to pay for this took place.

No mention of the fact that he would make a substantial commission for this sale was made and of course that it was hugely in his favour to complete this sale, regardless of the risks involved for me or the final outcome.

I pointed out time and time again that I was not willing to take any risks as I wanted a reliable and manageable way to repay my mortgage which was tailored to my needs. I was assured that this was FOOLPROOF, that is the word he used and of course convinced me that it was the right thing to do.

He was a representative of your bank and had been recommended to me by a manager of Barclays.

In conclusion, I have lost out considerably financially as a result of Mr XXXX and also the Insurance reps advice and appalling lack of customer care and in fact made no attempt to explain that there was any risk whatsoever attached to it.

I look forward to hearing back from you along with the appropriate level of compensation as recommended by the FSA – by you comparing the current value of the endowment with the amount of capital that I would have repaid had a repayment mortgage been used and refunding me the difference as compensation.

Unless I receive this I will be contacting the Ombudsman regarding this matter.

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

Im making a claim for an Edownment shortfall, this is my draft letter, please can anyone help me with 2 things:

1, Is there anything i should add/delete? (please feel free to edit it wherever you like!)

2, What sort of time limit should i give them? (bank charges was 14 days then 7 days i think?)

ALL advice would be greatly appreciated, Thankyou!!!:-|

 

1st January 2008

 

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Re Mortgage Endowment Plan.

 

Policy no.

 

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

I am making a strong complaint regarding the above Endowment Plan which was misold to me on 31.08.1988

 

This is for the reasons listed below.

 

This being my first Endowment mortgage I trusted your Manager at Barclays, XXXXX to give me trusted advice and to have both mine and the banks best interests at heart. This is seems was not the case at all.

 

I came with my wife to see your then manager, Mr XXX at XXXX because I was struggling with my repayments on my repayment mortgage I held with you at the time.

I was on Social security and invalidity benefit at the time ( and indeed is still the case)

 

I was advised by Mr XXX to change to an Endowment Mortgage plan as this would, he said solve my problems, as the Social security would pay the interest on this and all I would have to find were the Insurance premiums and he told me that this would be beneficial to me.

 

He said he would arrange for a Barclays Insurance representative to call at my home to talk to me about this is the near future which he did. Obviously him being a Barclays bank manager, I believed his advice would be in my best interests.

 

The agent called and his name was XXXXX ……… (I will find out his complete name) but it will be on your records anyway.

I was told by him that “Not only would it pay my mortgage off but I would also have a lump sum extra, and my only problem would be thinking how to spend it”

At NO TIME during his visit did he ever mention there was any risk involved, in fact he went on to say that no Endowment had ever failed to pay a mortgage off.

He was extremely bullish about the projected performance of the policy.

He knew of my financial circumstances and also knew that the policy ran well into my retirement and no discussion over how I would continue to pay for this took place.

 

No mention of the fact that he would make a substantial commission for this sale was made and of course that it was hugely in his favour to complete this sale, regardless of the risks involved for me or the final outcome.

 

I pointed out time and time again that I was not willing to take any risks as I wanted a reliable and manageable way to repay my mortgage which was tailored to my needs. I was assured that this was FOOLPROOF, that is the word he used and of course convinced me that it was the right thing to do.

He was a representative of your bank and had been recommended to me by a manager of Barclays.

 

In conclusion, I have lost out considerably financially as a result of Mr XXXX and also the Insurance reps advice and appalling lack of customer care and in fact made no attempt to explain that there was any risk whatsoever attached to it.

 

I look forward to hearing back from you along with the appropriate level of compensation as recommended by the FSA – by you comparing the current value of the endowment with the amount of capital that I would have repaid had a repayment mortgage been used and refunding me the difference as compensation.

 

Unless I receive this I will be contacting the Ombudsman regarding this matter.

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure but I would be inclined to give them 14 days from the date of sending to respond.

 

Do you have much paperwork to support your letter from when you bought the policy?

Mr & Mrs Ananya's story so far -

Welcome Finance - account closed - no CCA - 02/07 - £1500

NatWest - settled in full 09/06 - £600

NatWest - settled in full 06/07 - £72

Verso - Settled in full 07/08 - £2002

C.K. Edrupt/Provident - account closed - no CCA - 04/07 - £640

Littlewoods/Shop Direct - 2 accounts closed - Statute Barred - 04/10 - £800

D.C.A.s who've given up so far -10

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the promises were made verbally and unfortunately both the Barclays manager and the Insurance rep has left now.

However the facts that I was persuaded to change mortgage and the fact that I was on benefit at the time are of course all on record.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...