Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

jazzyb v's HSBC


jazzyb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Your call, but I would not entertain anything less than an offer of full payment.

 

Here is my reasoning. You could accept the offer in partial payment, but there are some problems in doing that:

 

1. Your LBA presumably said "if you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you...". Accepting a partial offer is not in line with what you said you would do.

 

2. If you deduct the partial sum (£1260) from the £1400 before you receive it, you will be removing the heat from the £1260 unless within the partial settlement agreement you set very clear and specific terms for it's payment (e.g. whether it's to be paid by cheque or direct to your account, within 48 hours or 7 days, etc.). From what I have read, given a chance some banks seem to pay as slowly or as late as possible even for payments which are the subject of a County Court claim, just prior to the hearing or other critical point.

 

3. If you wait for them to partially settle before continuing with your claim for the remaining £140 they have succeeded in stalling your claim.

 

4. What are the terms of their offer? Any agreement of partial settlement would have to address these. If they are akin to 'will pay x into your account, you must attend account review, all to be confidential, in full and final settlement' you need to decide which terms to accept.

 

Hope that helps,

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, i agree with what you've said, my only concren is that i have seen a few threads recently that would indicate that if a case did actually make it to court (and it's bound to be mine!:) ) the judge may not look upon it favourably (that HSBC had made me an offer and i declined) however the chances of it actually ending up in court are very doubtfull so i think i shall ignore the offer letter and stick to my timetable. onwards and upwards!

Thanks Bean

Link to post
Share on other sites

...my only concren is that i have seen a few threads recently that would indicate that if a case did actually make it to court (and it's bound to be mine!:) ) the judge may not look upon it favourably (that HSBC had made me an offer and i declined)...

 

An offer is exactly that, it can be accepted or declined. No obligation (unless it's perfect). Surely the court would not expect you to accept any offer unless it was a full settlement with no conditions. This is a first offer, close to your deadline, presumably on their terms, and falls 10% short of your full sum. I, for one, think that you are perfectly justified in issuing your claim.

 

Bear in mind that the bank/solicitors have contacted you (which is a more positive response than many of us have had) so as a simple matter of courtesy you should respond, but also as a matter of legal record you need to demonstrate that you have at least considered their offer. You have a duty to mitigate your losses, to show you want to foster meaningful dialogue, but you also need to ensure you don't get taken for a ride.

 

In summary, I would write to decline their offer, and I would issue the claim. If they are this close, perhaps first make a phone call to tell them this is your solemn intention. Maybe it will encourage them to settle in full.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is against the banking practice. I used to work for lloyds tsb and this sort of thing is deemed really unprofessional and problematic by the FSA and the banking code. I dont know who you could take it up with, but its definately worth doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is against the banking practice. I used to work for lloyds tsb and this sort of thing is deemed really unprofessional and problematic by the FSA and the banking code. I dont know who you could take it up with, but its definately worth doing.

 

Hello nikki,

 

What is against banking practice? What sort of thing? What is definitely worth doing?

 

?!

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After sending back a letter to accept offer as part payment and pursue for rest, received a letter today offering full amount (hipeee:D ) Thanks everyone for your help and i shall be making a donation when the money arrives. Now i've got the hang of this there's a couple of credit cards i'm going after.

Thanks again;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations jazzyb!!!

 

Well done.

 

Have you had any more thoughts on recovering costs of the loan you took out to deal with spiraling charges?

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bean, thanks alot:D Yep i'm still thinking about it, i've tried to read Janeyb thread but alot of it seems to be missing so am sure of the process and on what grounds i would make a claim. This is my understanding so far....i have had £1400 worth of unlawful charges in the last 6 years, the o/d at the time of the loan was around £1600 and the loan amount was £2000, do i claim back the interest against £1400 of the loan because theoretically had i had not had those charges levied against my account i would be only £200 o/d and so would not have required a loan......How am i doing so far:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bean, thanks alot:D Yep i'm still thinking about it, i've tried to read Janeyb thread but alot of it seems to be missing so am sure of the process and on what grounds i would make a claim. This is my understanding so far....i have had £1400 worth of unlawful charges in the last 6 years, the o/d at the time of the loan was around £1600 and the loan amount was £2000, do i claim back the interest against £1400 of the loan because theoretically had i had not had those charges levied against my account i would be only £200 o/d and so would not have required a loan......How am i doing so far:confused:

 

Hi jazzyb, be careful not to step off well-trodden ground:

 

This is new territory and so far not covered on this site so if you intend to proceed with it you MUST seek appropriate advice. I suggest you ask the Moderators for their views, and you would also be well advised to seek advice from a qualified professional.

 

For discussion purposes only, as I see it there are potentially three levels you could pitch a claim at:

1. Claim loan costs for £1400 (i.e. the loan interest on £1400 of it, and a proportion of set-up cost in the ratio £1400/£2000, i.e. 70%).

2. Claim loan costs on £1400, plus £1400 of the loan sum.

3. Claim all loan costs and all of the loan sum (in your case £2000) as janeyb successfully did.

 

Presumably, which of these you choose will depend on how well you can show the charges influenced the loan application process and your loan-taking decision.

 

Sorry I can't be of more help, but as you will appreciate you should only ever act on solid and specific advice.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bean, thanks alot:D Yep i'm still thinking about it, i've tried to read Janeyb thread but alot of it seems to be missing so am sure of the process and on what grounds i would make a claim. This is my understanding so far....i have had £1400 worth of unlawful charges in the last 6 years, the o/d at the time of the loan was around £1600 and the loan amount was £2000, do i claim back the interest against £1400 of the loan because theoretically had i had not had those charges levied against my account i would be only £200 o/d and so would not have required a loan......How am i doing so far:confused:

 

What I would say is that you would have been best to include that with your original claim, as the legal arguments you will be using are largely the same. Certainly you have a valid claim for the interest and any other consequential costs, but remember that the bank has settled without admitting liability, therefore you are starting from square one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Alan, Bean had suggested the same thing earlier in my claim, but i didn't get my act together. If i did decide to pursue for the interest etc. obviously the wording of the initial claim letter is going to be different, do you know of any templetes on the site that are usable or do you have any suggestions?

Appreciate your help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said before, the difficulty is that your arguments are exactly the same. You are stating that over the period of your claim the charges were levied in breach of all the legislation and regulations that you originally quoted. All you are adding is that, as a consequence of all this etc etc.....

 

The fact that they have given you a refund has no bearing whatsoever, as they have done this without admitting liability. You literally now have to go to the beginning of the process and even restate what charges they have levied, only this time you are not asking for them to be refunded.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If HSBC don't pay the rufund in my account by the agreed date is the agreement void and in which case can i carry on my claim to the courts and include the interest on my loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well payday has been and gone! HSBC have not credited my account within the agreed time:-x Was thinking of sending them a email to remind them and give them 24 hrs to pay or i will put a claim in at the courts, Is this fair? Does any one know of an email address that has proved fruitfull in getting to the right people. Colin Langdale is the guy who the letter was from so would really want it to land on his desk. Any thoughts anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jazzyb,

 

Can you clarify - have you issued your claim yet or not? From what you say, it looks like you were about to issue it when you received the full offer - Is this correct?

 

Why not see if you can contact Langdale directly (or any others who handled the offer) to arrange payment within 24 hours? If no payment within 24 hours, issue your claim to cover what they have taken plus court costs, and your consequential losses - you may wish to view my thread "Bean's Timeline (Current Account)" in the Lloyds TSB forum for wording of your 'Particulars of Claim'.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bean, no i havn,t put a claim into the court yet, i had sent my LBA letter out and then the next day received an offer which i rejected and then received a full offer a few days later. I will try today and speak direct to somebody in Langdales office and if i have no joy will put a claim in.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to Colin langdale on friday last week in regards to no payment, he told me that he hadn't received my signed agreement by which i replied when and by whom it had been signed for and so he faxed over another agreement for me to sign and fax back, the money was in the account that day. I also managed to persued him to cancel £125 of charges due to come out my account this month. He actually was very apologetic for the delay in payment and came across as being very reasonable, so if you are having problems it might be worth giving him a ring 0800 881 155. I have filled out the survey and made a donation. I have just sent a DPA for an account that is now closed which i had forgotten about and will start another thread.

Thanks to you all:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done jazzyb,

 

Do you mind me asking, did you agree to any conditions and did they include some/all of your loan/loan costs in your settlement?

 

Congratulations, and good luck with your new claim.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bean

 

There were no conditions specified in the agreement apart from " Full and final Settlement". The settlement did not include any amount of the loan or its costs and realistically the reason why we were in the position we were financially at the time of taking the loan was due more to our spending habits.

 

Good luck with all your claims:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - just so long as you are entirely happy with your settlement - enjoy it!

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...