Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • While we wait for someone to explain how farage is any better than sunak  .. if not worse   One of many likely upcoming belly laughs   Reform chairman Richard Tice has accused the Tories of (reform like) “dirty tricks” after one of his party’s candidates withdrew his papers to stand at the last minute and endorsed former cabinet minister Sir Gavin Williamson. In a dramatic final 24 hours before nominations closed there had been fevered speculation that as many as six Tory MPs and other candidates could defect to Reform after Nigel Farage decided to stand in Clacton and become leader. But instead no Tories switched and Tom Wellings, the Reform candidate for the new seat of Stone, Great Wryly and Penkridge in Staffordshire, quit and put out a statement endorsing Sir Gavin.   Who does he think he is an Anderson, a Carswell !!! was heard at the reform HQ pub ... as Candidate brushed aside by Farage in clacton to run as an independent    Tice accuses Tories of ‘dirty tricks’ to persuade Reform candidates to stand down WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: A furious row has broken out after a Reform candidate’s last minute defection to the Tories   :ROFL  
    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

jazzyb v's HSBC


jazzyb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Your call, but I would not entertain anything less than an offer of full payment.

 

Here is my reasoning. You could accept the offer in partial payment, but there are some problems in doing that:

 

1. Your LBA presumably said "if you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you...". Accepting a partial offer is not in line with what you said you would do.

 

2. If you deduct the partial sum (£1260) from the £1400 before you receive it, you will be removing the heat from the £1260 unless within the partial settlement agreement you set very clear and specific terms for it's payment (e.g. whether it's to be paid by cheque or direct to your account, within 48 hours or 7 days, etc.). From what I have read, given a chance some banks seem to pay as slowly or as late as possible even for payments which are the subject of a County Court claim, just prior to the hearing or other critical point.

 

3. If you wait for them to partially settle before continuing with your claim for the remaining £140 they have succeeded in stalling your claim.

 

4. What are the terms of their offer? Any agreement of partial settlement would have to address these. If they are akin to 'will pay x into your account, you must attend account review, all to be confidential, in full and final settlement' you need to decide which terms to accept.

 

Hope that helps,

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, i agree with what you've said, my only concren is that i have seen a few threads recently that would indicate that if a case did actually make it to court (and it's bound to be mine!:) ) the judge may not look upon it favourably (that HSBC had made me an offer and i declined) however the chances of it actually ending up in court are very doubtfull so i think i shall ignore the offer letter and stick to my timetable. onwards and upwards!

Thanks Bean

Link to post
Share on other sites

...my only concren is that i have seen a few threads recently that would indicate that if a case did actually make it to court (and it's bound to be mine!:) ) the judge may not look upon it favourably (that HSBC had made me an offer and i declined)...

 

An offer is exactly that, it can be accepted or declined. No obligation (unless it's perfect). Surely the court would not expect you to accept any offer unless it was a full settlement with no conditions. This is a first offer, close to your deadline, presumably on their terms, and falls 10% short of your full sum. I, for one, think that you are perfectly justified in issuing your claim.

 

Bear in mind that the bank/solicitors have contacted you (which is a more positive response than many of us have had) so as a simple matter of courtesy you should respond, but also as a matter of legal record you need to demonstrate that you have at least considered their offer. You have a duty to mitigate your losses, to show you want to foster meaningful dialogue, but you also need to ensure you don't get taken for a ride.

 

In summary, I would write to decline their offer, and I would issue the claim. If they are this close, perhaps first make a phone call to tell them this is your solemn intention. Maybe it will encourage them to settle in full.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is against the banking practice. I used to work for lloyds tsb and this sort of thing is deemed really unprofessional and problematic by the FSA and the banking code. I dont know who you could take it up with, but its definately worth doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is against the banking practice. I used to work for lloyds tsb and this sort of thing is deemed really unprofessional and problematic by the FSA and the banking code. I dont know who you could take it up with, but its definately worth doing.

 

Hello nikki,

 

What is against banking practice? What sort of thing? What is definitely worth doing?

 

?!

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After sending back a letter to accept offer as part payment and pursue for rest, received a letter today offering full amount (hipeee:D ) Thanks everyone for your help and i shall be making a donation when the money arrives. Now i've got the hang of this there's a couple of credit cards i'm going after.

Thanks again;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations jazzyb!!!

 

Well done.

 

Have you had any more thoughts on recovering costs of the loan you took out to deal with spiraling charges?

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bean, thanks alot:D Yep i'm still thinking about it, i've tried to read Janeyb thread but alot of it seems to be missing so am sure of the process and on what grounds i would make a claim. This is my understanding so far....i have had £1400 worth of unlawful charges in the last 6 years, the o/d at the time of the loan was around £1600 and the loan amount was £2000, do i claim back the interest against £1400 of the loan because theoretically had i had not had those charges levied against my account i would be only £200 o/d and so would not have required a loan......How am i doing so far:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bean, thanks alot:D Yep i'm still thinking about it, i've tried to read Janeyb thread but alot of it seems to be missing so am sure of the process and on what grounds i would make a claim. This is my understanding so far....i have had £1400 worth of unlawful charges in the last 6 years, the o/d at the time of the loan was around £1600 and the loan amount was £2000, do i claim back the interest against £1400 of the loan because theoretically had i had not had those charges levied against my account i would be only £200 o/d and so would not have required a loan......How am i doing so far:confused:

 

Hi jazzyb, be careful not to step off well-trodden ground:

 

This is new territory and so far not covered on this site so if you intend to proceed with it you MUST seek appropriate advice. I suggest you ask the Moderators for their views, and you would also be well advised to seek advice from a qualified professional.

 

For discussion purposes only, as I see it there are potentially three levels you could pitch a claim at:

1. Claim loan costs for £1400 (i.e. the loan interest on £1400 of it, and a proportion of set-up cost in the ratio £1400/£2000, i.e. 70%).

2. Claim loan costs on £1400, plus £1400 of the loan sum.

3. Claim all loan costs and all of the loan sum (in your case £2000) as janeyb successfully did.

 

Presumably, which of these you choose will depend on how well you can show the charges influenced the loan application process and your loan-taking decision.

 

Sorry I can't be of more help, but as you will appreciate you should only ever act on solid and specific advice.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bean, thanks alot:D Yep i'm still thinking about it, i've tried to read Janeyb thread but alot of it seems to be missing so am sure of the process and on what grounds i would make a claim. This is my understanding so far....i have had £1400 worth of unlawful charges in the last 6 years, the o/d at the time of the loan was around £1600 and the loan amount was £2000, do i claim back the interest against £1400 of the loan because theoretically had i had not had those charges levied against my account i would be only £200 o/d and so would not have required a loan......How am i doing so far:confused:

 

What I would say is that you would have been best to include that with your original claim, as the legal arguments you will be using are largely the same. Certainly you have a valid claim for the interest and any other consequential costs, but remember that the bank has settled without admitting liability, therefore you are starting from square one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Alan, Bean had suggested the same thing earlier in my claim, but i didn't get my act together. If i did decide to pursue for the interest etc. obviously the wording of the initial claim letter is going to be different, do you know of any templetes on the site that are usable or do you have any suggestions?

Appreciate your help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said before, the difficulty is that your arguments are exactly the same. You are stating that over the period of your claim the charges were levied in breach of all the legislation and regulations that you originally quoted. All you are adding is that, as a consequence of all this etc etc.....

 

The fact that they have given you a refund has no bearing whatsoever, as they have done this without admitting liability. You literally now have to go to the beginning of the process and even restate what charges they have levied, only this time you are not asking for them to be refunded.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If HSBC don't pay the rufund in my account by the agreed date is the agreement void and in which case can i carry on my claim to the courts and include the interest on my loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well payday has been and gone! HSBC have not credited my account within the agreed time:-x Was thinking of sending them a email to remind them and give them 24 hrs to pay or i will put a claim in at the courts, Is this fair? Does any one know of an email address that has proved fruitfull in getting to the right people. Colin Langdale is the guy who the letter was from so would really want it to land on his desk. Any thoughts anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jazzyb,

 

Can you clarify - have you issued your claim yet or not? From what you say, it looks like you were about to issue it when you received the full offer - Is this correct?

 

Why not see if you can contact Langdale directly (or any others who handled the offer) to arrange payment within 24 hours? If no payment within 24 hours, issue your claim to cover what they have taken plus court costs, and your consequential losses - you may wish to view my thread "Bean's Timeline (Current Account)" in the Lloyds TSB forum for wording of your 'Particulars of Claim'.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bean, no i havn,t put a claim into the court yet, i had sent my LBA letter out and then the next day received an offer which i rejected and then received a full offer a few days later. I will try today and speak direct to somebody in Langdales office and if i have no joy will put a claim in.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to Colin langdale on friday last week in regards to no payment, he told me that he hadn't received my signed agreement by which i replied when and by whom it had been signed for and so he faxed over another agreement for me to sign and fax back, the money was in the account that day. I also managed to persued him to cancel £125 of charges due to come out my account this month. He actually was very apologetic for the delay in payment and came across as being very reasonable, so if you are having problems it might be worth giving him a ring 0800 881 155. I have filled out the survey and made a donation. I have just sent a DPA for an account that is now closed which i had forgotten about and will start another thread.

Thanks to you all:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done jazzyb,

 

Do you mind me asking, did you agree to any conditions and did they include some/all of your loan/loan costs in your settlement?

 

Congratulations, and good luck with your new claim.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bean

 

There were no conditions specified in the agreement apart from " Full and final Settlement". The settlement did not include any amount of the loan or its costs and realistically the reason why we were in the position we were financially at the time of taking the loan was due more to our spending habits.

 

Good luck with all your claims:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - just so long as you are entirely happy with your settlement - enjoy it!

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...