Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not really. His claim will succeed simply because its a simple matter of a lost parcel and no insurance. Its not a complex case so I think he’ll be fine, especially as it is P2G who arent very good at defending claims but I ageee its not been handled at all well.   My only concern with withdrawing is that he loses £35 in the case of £240 but thats a matter for him   I dont think it has a reduced chance of success if OP actually replies and actions things but if not then ofcourse it will struggle.   My concern is if he starts again it’ll be just as sporadic.   Maybe close thread and let him make a new one if hes ready to engage?
    • Please will you start reading up on the stories on the some form especially the pinned post. I have to say that I'm concerned that you feel that a warning from P2G is going to affect your rights and is going to subvert statutory law. I think you've been here for a few months and I would have hoped that by now you would understand that terms and conditions must always be interpreted in the light of overriding statute. Also I suggested that once you have done the reading on the sub- forum then you would understand the information that we would need in order to give you the best help. The fact that you haven't told us what the item was suggested also that you haven't done the reading. Please give us full details including identity of the item, value, where these properly declared? Dates – blah blah blah. Not paying attention to P2G. Pay attention to us
    • P2G can make clear whatever they want frankly, the judge isnt going to sit there and go “they told you to buy their insurance and you didn’t” and then dismiss your claim.  I would say you should send a formal complaint then after 7 days sent a LOC. Day 21 from now submit your claim on OCMC.    
    • I thought i could just use ( copy and paste)  the terminology from my other post earlier in the year when i previously claimed against P2g .   The parcel hasnt been 'officially ' lost yet i have another 13 days before their 'investigation' ends and then theyll probably offer the postage back as i didnt take the 'insurance'   But to recap ,  The parcel was booked through P2g and sent with Evri. No Protective Insurance was taken out. The parcels value is only £48 plus postage of £3 and the value of the parcel was declared The parcels tracking says while it was in Evri's system it was sent to an 'incorrect' depot and tracking would be updated in 24 hrs which it didnt and the delivery date passed, i then had a live chat with P2g who opened an investigation and im waiting to hear what's happened. My only concern is,  last time i claimed P2g made it clear that in future i must take out their protective insurance which i gavent and im wondering whether this will ' complicate' things ...  
    • it is precisely for these reasons that the OP should withdraw the claim and begin again. Firstly, the case has been badly handled from the start. The OP hasn't come to us and stuck to it in a regular engaging way. Secondly, it seems that the OP is now being advised on the basis of it being a matter of principle rather than looking at a sensible and pragmatic outcome. We have a duty to the people who come to help us to try and get the best solution for them that we can. Secondary is that we want to notch up a further victory against the parcel delivery industry – and frankly it doesn't matter which company it is as long as we get a victory. If we simply urge someone to continue a case at their own expense in a claim which has a very reduced chance of success, simply because it gives us personal satisfaction, then this is really contrary to what we do and certainly contrary to the interests of the claimant. I'm now urging the OP (Original Poster) to withdraw and to start again and work with us very closely in order to get a much more certain victory. By continuing this claim, not only with the OP risk even more money, it will take more time in the sense of failure will be demoralising. Better to feel that one is in control by exercising one's own choices and taking the long view
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft letters!


Ingrid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ingrid the simplest and easiest thing to do is 'pretend' to be your daughter when talking to these fools. You know all your daughters personal details so will have no trouble answering their 'security questions'.

 

I can sympathise with you re contacting BT. I have phoned, emailed and phoned again over a query on my bill. My callls have been to the Indian Sub-Continent and back several times and Im still no further on. I have also reported then to OTELO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ODC, that was going to be my next step, masquerading as a my younger self!!! My daughter gave up speaking to them on the phone as, with respect, she couldn't understand what the other person was saying. I then told her to email or write. Emails seem to have a similar level of clarity!!

 

I think I shall sit down with a large cup of coffee and diarise all correspondence - it's going to take some time!!

 

In the meantime what is midas likely to do? The conversation with Craig the other day didn't get very far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The conversation with 'Craig' didnt go very far because

 

1. You were not offering him any money

 

2. The questions you asked were not on his script.

 

Send a letter to MIDAS by recorded delivery leaving them in no doubt that the alleged debt is in dispute with BT and that you will only be dealing with BT in an effort to have it resolved.

 

Midas wont like seeing their commission disappearing but hey life's tough isnt it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So how much longer do we give BT then - the first request for a report was back in October via email, with a couple of others since, plus a hard copy letter was sent on 3rd January and a follow up letter, enclosing the letter of 3rd January was sent Recorded Delivery on 23rd January.

 

Now, as you can see, we are quite a patient pair, but to have been deliberately ignored, with no acknowledgement letters ever received, is just plain rude. To continue sending threatening letters knowing that our request hasn't been done is negligent and harrassing!

 

Having been in a situation myself with TalkTalk and BCW, I know that their disputes are held for three weeks before they chase again (BCW told me so! though again nothing was forthcoming from TalkTalk!) Different issue, but the outcome was well in my favour!! I'll post about that little saga another time!

 

So, how long do I give B..... T......?

Link to post
Share on other sites

BT ask you to give them 12 weeks but I think you should go straight to OTELO with them. As for Dalk Dalk dont get me started about them and their so called service agents. That was why I returned to BT

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, having forgotten to phone these morons up masquerading as my daughter, 5 days after my call to "Craig" my daughter is sent a letter from their Home Collections Division. She brought the letter round to me today.

 

These no-brainers really don't understand when they are told that my daughter wants to see an engineers report to see what she is actually being charged for! She's invoiced for a Payment Charge so she's just expected to pay without question!?!

 

What should I tell her to do now - she lives on her own, albeit with her alsatian and husky and a few cats, but I don't want her to fell intimidated into anything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i dont know if this will help but if you send an email to the cheif executive of BT you should get results i had a 800 pound disputed debt i arranged a payment plan for what i believed was lawfully my charges(I.E call and internet costs) and the rest was written off the email is[email protected] I recieved instant acknowledgement of my email and the problem was sorted within 48 hours, i think it would definately be worth a shot even tough the debt has been passed on you have a genuine complaint and you should be able to get some clarification from ben i have never had a problem with the way any of my complaints/requests have been delt witeh when sent directly to him obviously should they wish to contact your daughter by telephone just to clarify what is going on ( they didnt ask me any security questions and the like so you could probibly deal with them also) include a contact telephone number in the email, trust me when i say this will only be used by ben or the complaints manager i have not recieved any further calls or letters since speaking the gentleman in question

 

I also have the direct line telephone number for their(BT) head of complaints and his email address.please,feel free to PM me if you would like these details also

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I have been putting together a diary of communications and haven't got round to emailing Mr Verwaayen as yet, but my daughter received another letter from Moorcroft as follows

 

I write in response to your recent dispute in relation to the above account and can confirm we have been in contact with British Telecommunications plc who advised us that there are no notes of your actual dispute. Therefore, please provide us with full written details of your dispute to enable us to assist you further.

 

I can also confirm I have placed your account on hold until 17th April 2008 and request you make immediate contact with our call centre on the above telephone number to discuss a repayment proposal you can afford and maintain.

 

If you are unhappy with the information provided please contact us by return (or in any event prior to the above date)

 

So BT has no notes, despite my daughter sending two Recorded Delivery letters (I know cos I took them to the Post Office for her) on 3rd and 23rd January! There are numerous emails (15 I have just counted) between both parties, plus a number of phone calls! And THERE ARE NO NOTES!!!!!:evil: That will explain why she's had no response from BT in writing!!:confused:

 

Customer Service Manager must have his office within the Bermuda Triangle!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Moorcrap

 

I have told you repeatedly this account is in dispute with BT. As such the matter should not have been passed to yourselves.

 

I have no intention of negotiating with you regarding this matter which I do not regard as any concern of yourselves. Therefore for the avoidance of any doubt please note that I WILL NOT be contacting your call centre to disscuss any payments.

 

I understand that any legal action would have to be instituted by the original creditor and not yourselves. Please note that any litigation will be strenuously contested and will result in a counter claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have been putting together a diary of communications and haven't got round to emailing Mr Verwaayen as yet, but my daughter received another letter from Moorcroft as follows

 

 

 

So BT has no notes, despite my daughter sending two Recorded Delivery letters (I know cos I took them to the Post Office for her) on 3rd and 23rd January! There are numerous emails (15 I have just counted) between both parties, plus a number of phone calls! And THERE ARE NO NOTES!!!!!:evil: That will explain why she's had no response from BT in writing!!:confused:

 

Customer Service Manager must have his office within the Bermuda Triangle!!

 

 

That'll be moorcroft spinning you a line, i dealt with ben just last friday and had a bill written off so its best to contact him as i said i can give you a direct line telephone number if you like im sure this will help ::-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Violent Indie, thanks everso much for your help. Think I'll suggest the email route to my daughter, as with my recent experience with TalkTalk, and indeed, Recorded Letters to BT in this case, the direct, written course would be best I think.

 

I have now diarised all recorded communications (I did ask my daughter tonight if she could remember dates of her initial calls but she couldn't as she wasn't expecting it to drag on this long) To date, from the original Bill back in May 2007, counting communications between her, BT and Moorcroft there have been 49 recorded communications! Goodness knows what the actual monetary cost is, and you can't put a price on the stress and frustration involved!

 

And still no Engineers Report!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ingrid, head you next letter in a larger font and bold:

 

Will you please have the courtesy to reply.

The 'please' is optional.

 

What was the engineer called for ? If it was after their socket on the wall then there is a charge, if it was anywhere before the socket then it their problem and there is no charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff

 

That's what we want the engineers report for - we don't know what his conclusion was!

 

Plus - the Payment Charge was for £103.50 + VAT, according to the BT website a Callout Charge is £99.50 + VAT.

 

Oh, and could someone clarify the difference between OfCom and Otelo - cos I is thick, innit! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had a chat with my son who is a BT engineer and he has told me that it is BTs at the point where it comes into the house. If it comes through the wall and is connected into a junction box and then wire runs through the house into the socket, the point from the junction box to the socket is your daughters, so it will be the callout charge plus any materials.

If it comes into the house and goes into the socket, then it is almost the same. Up to and including the socket is BTs so no charge, anything plugged into the socket and after is your daughters so will incure the callout charge plus any materials used.

 

Ask you daughter what they did and where, and if it was your daughters responsibility then you would be wise to make a payment of 'just the charge' direct to BT and forget Moorcroft.

 

Does that make sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...