Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Egg Account


lisamac8
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6010 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Cash advance fee (1.5%, £2 minimum?) has always been lawful and unreclaimable.

 

Overlimit penalty and Late Payment penalty are reclaimable as unlawful for being excessive, plus the debit interest (if any) which Egg levied on these penalties, as demonstrably itemised on your monthly statements.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The interest rate on this is abit wierd when i took out the account i could have sworn it was 0% for six months or something like that but as i go through the statements it shows that at the start it was at 0.944% in may 01 then goes up to 1.019% in sept 01.

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

While going through statements i have come across

 

10 Aug Misc

outstanding balance £582.91 min pay due £11.66

Monthly interest rate 0% *Finance Charge* £1.22

 

:confused:

 

Is this right or not or am i just silly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most credit cards which offer 0% interest for X months for balance transfer, usually have a clause in fine print, that if you exceeded limit or miss a payment, then the 0% concession becomes null and void. You could ring Egg or research their jungle of a website to confirm if "finance charge" is their way of manually overriding the 0% concession, for the aforesaid reason. Doubtful if you would get the result you want. Monthly interest can go up and down as Egg feels like, but they are obliged to give advance notice, in their case web info for this paperless, letter-less card company.

 

When you request refund, try to say you plan to go to the FOS, who will charge Egg £360 win lose or draw. That often persuades Egg that settlement is the better part of valour.

 

Good luck.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go again sorry to go on like this but upon going through my statements still!!! i have come across this

 

Statement 07 jan 05 - 31 jan 05

 

balance bf - 2291.73

31 jan - Payment received £5

31 jan - Charge off account - 2061.53

31 jan - refund of interest - 225.20

 

Very, very very :confused:

 

Closing balance 0.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

That statement was nearly 3 years old. If even you cannot remember what happened, and you suggest I am a mind reader I shall take it as a compliment. :D

 

Was your card closed 3 years ago with balance transferred to an Egg Loan Account? Was your £225.20 interest cancelled or written off by arrangement? If you have a statement for the opening balance of your Egg Loan account, then that will prove the continuity with the closing balance(?) of your old Egg card.

 

I am not Sherlock Holmes, I am merely Dr Watson. ;)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mistermind

sorry

i went with B & E in 2004 and something happened in that time i am not sure what but here are the statements before middle and after.

 

07 december 04 - 07 january 05

balance brought forward £2,296.73

31 dec payment received - £5

closing balance - £2,291.73

 

07 january 05 - 31 january 05

Balance brought forward £2,291.73

31 jan payment received £5

31 jan charge off account - £2,061.53

31 jan refund of interest - £225.20

closing balance - £0.00

 

07 february 05 - 07 march 05

balance brought forward - £2,286.73

28 feb payment received - £5

closing balance - £2,281.73

 

I never closed the account nor got any correspondence from egg that they had done this, should i just ring them?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looked as if in January 2005 your interest was taken off, then your card balance was taken off.

 

Then the same interest and balance was put back on, resulting in no change. Because Egg sends out no statements and letters, if you do not regularly logon and read your own statements online it is quite easy to miss what they were doing and why.

 

You might remember something from 3 years ago, was there a change from one Egg account to another? You might like to check with Egg, they may have a trail explaining these movements. But as you neither gained nor lost anything, is there anything to gain by finding out -- by hanging onto the phone talking to one Eggployee after another?

 

So long as you can get hold of an itemised list of unlawful charges, that is all you need. And the list of debit interest accrued on said unlawful charges.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...