Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI on HSBC loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Starting a thread here because I think I may have a case. Was forced into a loan 3½ years ago after changing jobs and reaching my overdraft limit, HSBC would not give me a temporary increase and offered me no option but to take the loan. A year or so later and for whatever reason I found myself in the same position again, and HSBC made me take another loan to cover the first one and my overdraft.

 

I don't have any paperwork for the first loan (DPA request should produce that among other things) but the copy I got of the current loan agreement has made me think. I noticed that where I have signed to take up PPI, the date is in someone else's writing, whereas on the loan itself I have clearly written the date myself. Thinking back I recall the lass in the branch calling me up to say I'd forgotten to sign something, and sending the agreement back to me with the PPI bit highlighted... I was stressed out about it all and can't work out why I firstly didn't sign there, then after I was pressed did sign.

 

Hopefully my DPA request will fill in some blanks. I know for a fact they did not ask about pre-existing conditions, such as the depression which I was probably suffering again at the time the loan was arranged; but I think I may have been coerced into signing for the PPI.

 

*deep breath*

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've procrastinated over this, mainly because I knew it would take some brainpower to unravel. Firstly all I got from my Data Protection Act request was copies of the loan agreements & the PPI charges (though no T&C for any of it), statements, and confirmation that they have no recordings/transcripts of calls. No sign of any notes made by staff or anything else. (something to hide..?)

 

First loan of £1500 was forced upon me in May 2004 when I had just changed jobs; going from weekly to monthly pay meant 5 weeks without income and this was HSBC's response to me requesting a (temporary) overdraft increase. By the time it was arranged I was already £200 past my limit of £750. I ticked the boxes for PPI (£260) and together with interest it came to £2243-01 payable over 3 years.

 

Being as unskilled in financial matters as I am, I again skimmed my overdraft limit a few times and HSBC had stung me for £687 worth of charges by the time I was forced to take a second loan in July 2005. I had not missed any payments on my loan but was nearly £600 over my limit due to those charges, and was pushed into replacing the first loan with a new one for £3000 plus £750 PPI plus interest - total £5231-81 over 5 years.

 

This second loan particularly is bothering me, PPI-wise. I was depressed and completely stressed out at the time and I am now convinced they pushed me or took advantage of me, to get my signature for PPI. I remember signing the agreement (despite cursing them all the way) and I think I may have decided against the PPI as an unnecessary expense. I definitely remember the branch ringing to say I'd forgotten to sign something and sending it back - the implication being that unless I signed this I wouldn't get the cash. In my confused state I signed it, probably without looking at what I was signing for. This would explain why the date on that part of the form is not in my writing - either that or they forged my signature :confused:

 

I'm sure this PPI was mis-sold, what does anybody else think? It is probably useless anyway if I had to make a claim based on depression/stress which is clearly pre-existing, no of course they didn't ask me about that...

 

I'm at least due the interest on the £687 charges (which I have already reclaimed) - I make this to be £271-47. I would however appreciate any advice the good old CAG could give me before I start writing letters :)

 

Cheers,

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've procrastinated over this, mainly because I knew it would take some brainpower to unravel. Firstly all I got from my Data Protection Act request was copies of the loan agreements & the PPI charges (though no T&C for any of it), statements, and confirmation that they have no recordings/transcripts of calls. No sign of any notes made by staff or anything else. (something to hide..?)

 

First loan of £1500 was forced upon me in May 2004 when I had just changed jobs; going from weekly to monthly pay meant 5 weeks without income and this was HSBC's response to me requesting a (temporary) overdraft increase. By the time it was arranged I was already £200 past my limit of £750. I ticked the boxes for PPI (£260) and together with interest it came to £2243-01 payable over 3 years.

 

Being as unskilled in financial matters as I am, I again skimmed my overdraft limit a few times and HSBC had stung me for £687 worth of charges by the time I was forced to take a second loan in July 2005. I had not missed any payments on my loan but was nearly £600 over my limit due to those charges, and was pushed into replacing the first loan with a new one for £3000 plus £750 PPI plus interest - total £5231-81 over 5 years.

 

This second loan particularly is bothering me, PPI-wise. I was depressed and completely stressed out at the time and I am now convinced they pushed me or took advantage of me, to get my signature for PPI. I remember signing the agreement (despite cursing them all the way) and I think I may have decided against the PPI as an unnecessary expense. I definitely remember the branch ringing to say I'd forgotten to sign something and sending it back - the implication being that unless I signed this I wouldn't get the cash. In my confused state I signed it, probably without looking at what I was signing for. This would explain why the date on that part of the form is not in my writing - either that or they forged my signature :confused:

 

I'm sure this PPI was mis-sold, what does anybody else think? It is probably useless anyway if I had to make a claim based on depression/stress which is clearly pre-existing, no of course they didn't ask me about that...

 

I'm at least due the interest on the £687 charges (which I have already reclaimed) - I make this to be £271-47. I would however appreciate any advice the good old CAG could give me before I start writing letters :)

 

Cheers,

Loz

 

Hello Loz,

 

Were was the first post you put on the forum been hiding:-o

 

The first thing that springs to mind, is how these financial institutes prey on the most vunerable, as your trusted bank they are well aware of financial difficulties their customers are having.

 

The sad thing is that we were so grateful to them:mad: but now we are a bit wiser in their strive for profit.

 

You must start the ball rolling with them, start the process in reclaiming back your ppi, ppi interest they charged and then interest at their contractual rate:D

 

If you need help, advice etc, just shout:D

  • Haha 1

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Loz,

 

Were was the first post you put on the forum been hidin

 

The first thing that springs to mind, is how these financial institutes prey on the most vunerable, as your trusted bank they are well aware of financial difficulties their customers are having.

 

The sad thing is that we were so grateful to them:mad: but now we are a bit wiser in their strive for profit.

 

You must start the ball rolling with them, start the process in reclaiming back your ppi, ppi interest they charged and then interest at their contractual rate

 

If you need help, advice etc, just shout

 

Hi HHNF,

You caught my blond moment, I initially posted this under HSBC... :rolleyes:

 

I'm not sure exactly the difference you mean by the interest on the PPI and the contractual rate - the way HSBC do this is to work out what the total interest will be over the 5 years and add that to the balance up front rather than adding it monthly :confused:

 

Having made 2½ years worth of payments I am obviously about halfway through - adding up the PPI + PPI interest + interest on the original charges makes up half again of the remaining balance :|

 

Once I've done this, if I wanted to complain about the way I was forced into the loan in the first place would that be worth pursuing?

 

Cheers,

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HHNF,

You caught my blond moment, I initially posted this under HSBC... :rolleyes:

 

I'm not sure exactly the difference you mean by the interest on the PPI and the contractual rate - the way HSBC do this is to work out what the total interest will be over the 5 years and add that to the balance up front rather than adding it monthly :confused: Yes you are correct, they add the premium and the premium interest together and its front loaded loan. When I mention the contractual interest, I mean you add the premium, premium interest together, and then calculate the daily interest at the interest rate they charged you ie 8.9%, 14.9% The interest rate per month/annum, not hte APR there is a difference. But we can discuss this a bit latter. This is from the date the loan started. Like the bank charges, you can ask for the statutory 8%interest, from the date the took the charge to the day they pay it back.:D

 

Having made 2½ years worth of payments I am obviously about halfway through - adding up the PPI + PPI interest + interest on the original charges makes up half again of the remaining balance :| Even if you are half way through the term there is still ppi and interest in the balance owing, so you want the whole lot back.

 

Once I've done this, if I wanted to complain about the way I was forced into the loan in the first place would that be worth pursuing? Even whilst you are doing this, you tell them that you will be reporting their conduct to the Financial Services Authority, Office of Fair Trading and Trading standards, and do it anyway, the more complaints the better.

 

Cheers,

Loz

Hello Loz,

 

I have put some comments in red for your attention. There are some very helpful people on this forum who are all willing to help and advise, so I hope you will feel at home here.:D

 

Thank you for the click of the scales, you are more than welcome:D

 

Don't forget, any question, query, just ask and if we don't know the answer, we will find out

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again HHNF, the agreement says the "interest rate per annum" is 14.9%, which is the same as the quoted APR; however it then says the "simple rate" is 13.97%.

 

Will be writing a nice letter tomorrow, brain too tired to start now :p

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

My letter is in the post - as well as asking for the charges interest/PPI+interest back I have also disputed their recent claim that I missed a payment some time (unknown). They sent me a statement as part of my Data Protection Act request and I can't see anything wrong - my SO bounced once because of their damn charges but I found alternative funding so as far as I'm concerned I made that payment, and the statement backs this up.

 

I found some more evidence that they were implying I wouldn't get the loan without PPI - on page 3 of the agreement after the sig box for PPI there is a section regarding the setting up of a standing order:

By signing above, I/we authorise you to pay from my/our current account XXXXXXXX

(a) to yourselves, an arrangement fee (if any), an initial repayment of £87-01 and 59 further repayments of £87-20 all in accordance with the Schedule above

(b) to my insurers, the Personal Loan Protection Plan balancing payment and the amount of my Personal Loan Protection Plan loan, amounting in total to £753-80

Nowhere else on the agreement is there any other reference to setting up a standing order for £69-76, which would be the monthly repayment without PPI.

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Letter dated 26th Feb from one Richard Johnson (senior manager, regulated complaints and review), stating that he will investigate my PPI complaint and other departments will handle the rest. Usual stuff about replying within 4 weeks.

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An other letter dated 20th March regarding my PPI complaint, unsurprisingly telling me they are still investigating... they have 12 days tops I reckon before their 8 weeks are up and I can go to the FOS.

 

The other issues I raised - they are still claiming that I missed a payment but can't make up their minds when! I've been told 3 different dates by 3 different HSBC staff, November 2007 then October 2006 and now September 2006; I keep telling them that the statement they gave me contradicts their claims but they really are determined :rolleyes:

If nothing else it's a fun game and a legitimate way of disputing the account, which is quite useful at the moment :p

 

Finally I explained my reasons for requesting repayment of the interest on the charges portion of the loan (£271-47 of £687-00), and their response is as follows:

I can see that you were refunded £737-24 in November 2007. Please note that I will not be looking to refund any interest.

Well actually it was November 2006 but the charges that became part of this loan were reclaimed in May 2006 - can I really push for this interest to be refunded even though I accepted full & final settlement on that refund? :confused:

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

An other letter dated 20th March regarding my PPI complaint, unsurprisingly telling me they are still investigating... they have 12 days tops I reckon before their 8 weeks are up and I can go to the FOS.

 

The other issues I raised - they are still claiming that I missed a payment but can't make up their minds when! I've been told 3 different dates by 3 different HSBC staff, November 2007 then October 2006 and now September 2006; I keep telling them that the statement they gave me contradicts their claims but they really are determined :rolleyes:

If nothing else it's a fun game and a legitimate way of disputing the account, which is quite useful at the moment :p

 

Finally I explained my reasons for requesting repayment of the interest on the charges portion of the loan (£271-47 of £687-00), and their response is as follows:

 

Well actually it was November 2006 but the charges that became part of this loan were reclaimed in May 2006 - can I really push for this interest to be refunded even though I accepted full & final settlement on that refund? :confused:

 

Loz

 

Hello Loz,

 

What was their response Loz

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HHNF,

 

Not sure what you are asking, perhaps I need more coffee... :confused:

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HHNF,

 

Not sure what you are asking, perhaps I need more coffee... :confused:

 

Hiya Loz,

 

No I think I need to wear my glasses, I mis-read your post. You stated their response at the top of the post:lol:

 

Do hope I have not sent you into caffene overdrive yaya yaya:lol:

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

How lovely of HSBC to keep giving me reasons to dispute this account and therefore delay paying the arrears I do have - a letter dated 9th April claiming my monthly payment was not made. Erm, yes it was, it left my account on the 1st and the details on the standing order are correct :rolleyes:

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found my original agreement with T&C attached, correct me if I'm wrong but I can't see anything that allows them to share my info with CRAs... which they clearly have been doing :mad:

 

tc1zb7.th.jpgtc2xb3.th.jpg

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found my original agreement with T&C attached, correct me if I'm wrong but I can't see anything that allows them to share my info with CRAs... which they clearly have been doing :mad:

 

tc1zb7.th.jpgtc2xb3.th.jpg

 

Loz

 

Well spotted loz, neither can I, maybe sue the pants off them:lol: under the dpa

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly my thoughts HHNF, as soon as I'm done with my PPI complaint I will be complaining about the selling of the loan as a whole, and the DPA has just been added to my list of grievances.

 

Maybe a new thread in the HSBC section would be in order, to draw people's attention to this - this certainly won't be the only agreement with no consent to data processing :rolleyes:

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a reply from HSBC regarding my PPI complaint (with apologies for length):

[...]

 

Your concerns as I understand them are that:

  • You believe that you were mis-sold your Personal Loan Protection Plan.
  • You have stated that you felt you could not say no to the insurance otherwise your loan would not be agreed.
  • You have stated that you were forced into signing the loan forms. I actually said I was misled
  • You state that you were not told how much the repayments would be without the protection plan.
  • You have requested to be repaid the full protection premium paid plus interest.

Having taken the opportunity to review the records we hold in relation to this matter, I regret that I am unable to support your complaint. Perhaps I can explain why.

 

Our records show that in July 2005 you applied for (more like I was forced to take) an unsecured Personal Loan. A loan of £3000-00 was agreed repayable over a term of 5 years [...] these repayments also included the Personal Loan Protection Plan [...]

 

I can confirm that this plan was suitable for a customer with your requirements. Your signature to the Declaration on the Demands, Needs and Recommendations (DNR) form confirmed that the information recorded was correct and that you were in receipt of the essential literature for the Personal Loan Protection Plan being arranged. In particular you confirmed receipt of the Product Information Pack and Policy Document, which provided a full explanation of how the Personal Loan Protection Plan worked including details of how to make a claim. In addition this form confirmed that you were aware the policy was optional. Er, I'm not sure it did, not explicitly

 

I also wish to bring to your attention that the Product Information Pack confirmed that you had a period of 30 days in which you had the right to cancel the Personal Loan Protection Plan. This provided you with time to read the Policy Document and to raise any queries you may have had with the plan or to change your mind and not proceed with it.

 

Consequently, I consider adequate steps were taken to inform you of the main features and claim procedures of your Personal Loan Protection Plan. I am therefore unable to agree to the refund of premiums that you seek.

 

[...]

 

I regret that I can find no evidence to suggest you were informed at the point of sale that the Personal Loan Protection Plan was a requirement of the Personal Loan rather than it being optional. However, I would reiterate that the Personal Loan Protection Plan is an optional policy and your signature to the Loan Agreement Form and DNR Form confirmed you were happy to proceed with the plan. FWIW I have never been "happy" with any aspect of this loan

This is the "DNR" form which they have sent:

form1wp9.th.jpgform2nv6.th.jpg

Although I can't recall having seen this before, it would seem that I signed it... a few days after I signed the loan form. I certainly didn't tick the boxes; in fact (IMHO) the way the form is worded makes it seem as if it is designed for HSBC staff to complete it :confused:

 

Here's another question - at the beginning of this I made a DPA request for full disclosure, why did I not receive a copy of this form until now? It also refers to something titled "Your Information" which I did not receive a copy of - if this exists then it may be where they believe they gained permission to share my data, and that would be that argument out of the water. :-(

 

I would appreciate any further advice before I go to the FOS with this. I'd also like opinions on what I can do about them withholding things from my Subject Access Request. I want to make a complaint about the loan as a whole, but if they have been hiding things that I need for evidence, where do I stand?

 

Cheers,

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I'd make it clear that I really do feel I was led to believe I had to take the PPI. I sent the loan form back without that bit signed, and they called up to say I had "forgotten" to sign somewhere. Bear in mind I was really stressed out at the time, at them basically giving me no option but to take their loan, is it any wonder that I just signed and returned the damn thing? There is no way that they made it clear PPI was optional, otherwise why would they have insisted I sign that section??

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Been busy/away so haven't filled out the FOS form yet, will do that tonight. I guess I should cancel the damn PPI anyway shouldn't I? Though I am concerned that they will do something sneaky when they "refinance" the remaining loan without it :confused:

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been busy/away so haven't filled out the FOS form yet, will do that tonight. I guess I should cancel the damn PPI anyway shouldn't I? Though I am concerned that they will do something sneaky when they "refinance" the remaining loan without it :confused:

 

Loz

 

Hello Loz,

 

I think we have all been busy with one thing and another:D . When you write to cancel the ppi, tell them what you want, don't wait till they do what they want;-)

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Form & evidence sent to FOS today... fingers crossed. I asked HSBC to cancel the damn policy and adjust the outstanding balance.

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Forgot to update this, they refused to cancel the PPI because they still think there are arrears on the account. I have tried to explain three times now that they are wrong. Not funny any more. :(

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well it looks like the FOS have done the trick on this one :) Letter dated 11th July from HSBC:

Having thoroughly reviewed your case, I propose to uphold your complaint ...I propose to unwind your Personal Loan Protection Plan and refund all the premiums you have paid to date (including interest). The amount of the offer is £659-70 ...this offer includes an element of gross interest amounting to £66-78.

 

They go on to state that they must also reschedule the remaining loan onto a new agreement without PPI. I have been given an appointment next Tuesday to sort this out - will have to make sure they don't do anything sneaky! :p

 

Today I also received a letter from the FOS confirming it all. I'll fill in the acceptance forms and send them back tomorrow, if anyone has any observations/suggestions, now is the time to make them! :)

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, they still claim I am a month in arrears on the loan. I have checked, double checked and triple checked, sent them the evidence a gazillion times, but still they insist... Oh well once the loan is rearranged it won't matter in a financial sense but they will still have marked my credit file. I'll have to insist they amend it :rolleyes:

 

Loz

I hate Alliance + Leicester

BT: No longer a customer :)

HSBC: £1222 refunded 28/5/06; Second claim of £737-24 refunded 9/11/06; PPI + interest on personal loan refunded 27/7/08

MBNA: £100 refunded on first claim of £112; £208 refunded on second claim for £108 24/9/07; PPI £256-28 refunded 8/4/08

NatWest: £1581-71 refunded 16/12/06; personal loan CCA agreement not provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...