Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You pushed me to look at all our MET cases going back till June 2014.  That's 10 years so at that point I got sick & stopped! MET have never, ever taken a Cagger as far as a court hearing in all that time. As scribbled above, they have issued court papers a few times but have always bottled before the hearing. In one exceptional case the motorist didn't even have to defend - the judge chucked out the case due to rubbish Particulars of Claim. Sadly in two cases MET got a judgment because the motorist didn't file a defence to the claim.  But in one of the cases MET still didn't get their money as the person said he was elderly, didn't need credit and would rather put up with a CCJ than pay MET! So that's who you're dealing with - paper tigers.  They do court in maybe 5% of cases but even then bottle before it gets to a hearing. Anyway, let's see what writing to BP produces.
    • Any update here? MET started a court case recently against a Cagger concerning this very site and EV charging - and then bottled it and discontinued the case before the hearing. It would be useful for others to know what happened in your case.
    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fenton Cooper re (Lloyds)


JGJ
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Advice wanted Please. A few months ago LLOYDS settled out of court re their horrendous charges which had been placed onto my BUSINESS Acc. I have now been contacted by two D.C.As. ROCKWELL and today FENTON COOPER. Both are claiming LLOYDS have instructed them to collect on an alleged debt after the settlement ,as it did not fully pay off the balance owing. Both D.C.As are claiming the exact amount in their letters. My question is who do I send the S.A.R. and C.C.A letters to D.C.As or Lloyds??. I think Lloyds after closing my Bus Acc. sold off or whatever they do with alleged debts to the sharks to pick up the scraps. Any advice will be taken gratefully. :confused:;) "EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be awkward, I wouldn't CCA either yet, i would raise a complaint with trading standards for breach of OFT guidelines, and send them BOTH the following letter:

 

DCA Address

 

Date

 

Your Address

 

YOUR REF: XXXX

 

Dear Sir / madam,

 

RE: Formal complaint

I note that you claim you are collecting the sum of £XXX on behalf of CREDITOR. Please note that:

a. CREDITOR has never instructed me that you are acting on their behalf, or sent me the "goodbye" letter required by the OFT Debt Collection Guidelines

b. OTHER DCA has claimed they are acting on behalf of CREDITOR.

I am also aware that OTHER DCA is alleged to be part of the same group as your company. I have raised this issue with trading standards. Please note, that using several debt collection agencies to collect the same debt at the same time is a breach of the OFT Debt Collection guidelines.

Furtherm misleading customers about the status (such as ownership) of a debt is also a breach of the OFT Debt Collection guidelines.

Please provide some evidence that you are acting on behalf of CREDITOR in this matter. Also, please confirm on what basis you are claiming this alleged debt. Finally, please regard my complaints as to lack of communication a formal complaint under your complaints procedure, and provide a copy of that complaints procedure.

Yours sincerly,

 

XXX. (type, don't sign)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomterm8, Letter sent by reg. post next day, reply received within 5 days.

We refer to your letter etc. the contents of which have been noted. We would respond to your points as follows.

Point A

The reason you have not received a goodbye letter is because the debt has not been sold. We are acting on a commission basis to recover an amount outstanding to our clients which they state is due and owing to them. As the debt has not been sold by our clients there is no requirement to send a goodbye letter.

Point B

Rockwell Debt Collection Agency were previously instructed to act on our clients behalf, however, as repayment has not been forthcoming they have now closed their files and the account has now been passed to Fenton Cooper. Therefore, there has been no breach of the OFT guidlines as only one recovery agent has been instructed at any one time.

We now look forward to receiving your firm and realistic repayment proposals within a final period of 10 days from the date of this letter if further action is to be avoided. We must advise that in the event that we do not receive your proposals, together with an initial payment on account, we shall be left with little option but to return to our clients to take further instructions from them in respect of this matter. We trust however that further action will not become necessary and look forward to receiving your co-operation.

 

Yours sincerely

 

xxxxxxx xxxx

manager

litigation @ investigation department

FENTON COOPER

 

 

Trading Standards were contacted and a formal complaint was lodged with them for further investigation. Re my posting 1 above

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would wait and see what they produce. Have you sent them a credit agreement request yet?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[Therefore, there has been no breach of the OFT guidlines as only one recovery agent has been instructed at any one time.[/i]

 

On the contrary; the original creditor is supposed to inform the debtor if the debt is passed to a 'new' DCA, so their statement is incorrect as to fact, and thus a breach of OFT guidelines in itself (using deceitful or misleading statements)...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

tomterm8. My position to date is as post#4 above.I have not requested a credit agreement as yet, should I or should I wait until their next move?? :confused:

 

personally, I would send them a CCA request, with the £1 postal order, special delivery - don't sign it & etc.

 

as people have mentioned, this response is against the guidelines, and you could complain now, but i would hang off a little, and see what the CCA request produces.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(Re post #4 Advise please) Letter received today from FENTON COOPER. Dear sir RE:- Outstanding Amount to Lloyds/TSB BANK Plc of £,***,** Thank you for your response to our recent letter. We note your comments and have sought further information from our client. We will contact you again shortly.If you have any queries with your outstanding balance please contact our referral team on 01702 444457 Yours faithfully FENTON COOPER. (This letter received today 8th Dec. in response to my letter for a C.C.A.) Letter sent by recorded signed for Del. on 3rd Dec.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...