Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Robinson Way - Incompetence


uk1975
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6017 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was contacted by Robinson Way, telling me I owed HBOS just over £4600

 

On disputing this and asking for a copy of all related paperwork for this debt I was then told that I would need to contact HBOS for this information as it was them who held it all .... this I refused to do as RW had bought the debt from HBOS and should have all associated paperwork.

 

After numerous phone calls from RW I actually received a call from somebody who seemed to know what they were talking about, as when I stated for the umpteenth time that I had requested copies of the signed credit agreement from them, they actually agreed to send copies and statements of accounts/payments to me.

 

I received said credit agreement and contacted RW by telephone immediately as the details on the agreement differed from mine in a number of areas:

  1. Full Name: the person identified had a middle name, I do not
  2. Address: the person identified lived at the other end of the country .... somewhere I have never lived
  3. Mother's Maiden Name: not my Mother's name
  4. Occupation: again, nowhere near any job I have ever done
  5. Earnings: way above any of my salaries
  6. Signature: nothing like mine.

I was told over the phone that as I had highlighted these points the debt would be passed back to HBOS to investigate and I would receive written confirmation from RW that the debt was nothing to do with me.

 

3 weeks pass and I had not received anything further from RW so I again spoke to them to find out why I have heard nothing, and am told that everything is still with HBOS.

 

Today, I get a further call from RW to advise that the collection of the debt is on hold, but they require a letter from me stating the reasons why I am disputing the debt/alleging identity theft, to which I had a few choice words to say to the person on the other end of the phone .... whilst also stating that this was not a direct verbal attack on her, but astonishment at the incompetence of RW as a whole, I wanted to know:

  1. Why I had not been advised almost 4 weeks ago that they would require my reasons for disputing this debt in writing,
    The Response .... I'm advising you now.
  2. Why had it taken me numerous attempts to obtain the initial paperwork from them in the first place ... including being told that I should contact HBOS personally
    The Response ... I don't know the full history
  3. How long this would take to be resolved as I could be looking for a mortgage in the very near future, and having this supposed debt on my credit file would jeopardise my chances ... and if it did stop me getting mortgage approval I would be taking action against RW.
    The Response ... I don't know

Anyway, the upshot is that they will now get the letter detailing my reasons for disputing the debt with HBOS, and also a letter of complaint to their Customer Services/Collections Manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NEVER deal with them on the phone.

 

If you do everything in writing from day one, then you have a trail of avidence to back up your complaints to Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, not to mention the Information Commissioner's Office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst concurring with 1's advise not to speak to them over the 'phone, when you do put your letter of complaint in do so using their internal complaints resolution procedure and use the appropriate address....

 

RWcomps1.jpg

 

RWcomps2.jpg

 

For a little light hearted reading take a read of my Robinson, Way & Co thread!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/71386-diskmandave-robinson-way-co.html

They aren't the brightest light in the box, but i'm guessing you've already worked that out! :roll:

 

Good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur - it's only when you have everything in writing that you ahve a leg to stand on.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you do write to them, pointing out you advised them on the phone, your reasons for disputing their letters to you ask them how they intend to make up for the distress and inconvenience caused to you by this matter.

 

You could gently remind them that a complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman is being considered. That will cost them at least £400 - they must surely have had their two free investigations by now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robinson Way - incompetence. As good a summary of this company's operating standards as I've seen.
Robinson Way - The Epitome of Incompetence. Sets the standard that others often lower themselves to. Allegedly:D
  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your advice.

 

The letter has now been sent off to Robinson Way and copied to the Customer Care Manager at London Scottish (sent by email with hard copies following by recorded delivery).

 

We shall see what they come back with :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your advice.

 

The letter has now been sent off to Robinson Way and copied to the Customer Care Manager at London Scottish (sent by email with hard copies following by recorded delivery).

 

We shall see what they come back with :rolleyes:

For your info', they're one and the same, but it shows that you mean business...

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a run in with this firm in May and June this year for my son - nearly 20 phone calls they made but they wouldn't put anything in writing to him or disclose anything to me - oneofakind is write don't phone them, just write to them and keep a paper trail and notes of any phone calls they make - most of these debt collecting organisations dont like dealing with the written word as it ties them down

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

For info ... this is he text of the letter sent

 

The Collections Manager

Robinson Way & Company Limited

London Scottish House

Quays Reach

Carolina Way

Salford

M50 2ZY

6 November 2007

Re: Ex HBOS Account

Ref:

Dear Sir or Madam:

Further to a telephone call from one of your representatives yesterday, Monday 5 November 2007, regarding the above debt I am writing to confirm the reasons that this debt is no responsibility of mine.

These points, listed below, were stated in a telephone call to your office in mid October.

1) Full Name: the person this debt applies to, ……………………….. has a middle name

a) I do not have, and never have used a middle name.

2) Address: the person identified lived in Clacton on Sea, Essex at the time of the application.

a) I have never lived anywhere in Essex

3) Mother's Maiden Name: ……………….

a) This is NOT my Mother’s maiden name

4) Occupation: Electrician

a) I have never worked as an electrician

5) Gross Annual Income: £25,000

a) Not my gross annual income.

6) Signature:

a) Bears NO resemblance to my signature

I would also like to raise a few points about the inconsistency of information and poor level of customer service I have received from Robinson Way in this matter:

1) On receipt of the letter on Friday 24 August 2007 informing me of this debt, I contacted Robinson Way by telephone to make enquiries and obtain information about the debt. I was advised by your representative that I should contact HBOS directly to query the account.

This I refused to do as collecting the debt was the responsibility of Robinson Way.

Following a number of calls from your representatives over the following weeks I was finally provided with the requested information … even though all that was sent was a copy of the Credit Card Application form and NOT a true copy of the Credit Agreement.

 

 

a) What I would like to know is WHY was I advised to contact HBOS to query the account? Is this not the responsibility of Robinson Way as the owners of this debt to supply the requested associated paperwork?

 

2) On finally receiving the requested paperwork I IMMEDIATELY contacted Robinson Way by telephone to confirm that this debt was in NO WAY associated with me. During this telephone conversation I requested that Robinson Way send written confirmation to me that this debt was no longer being associated with me.

 

a) After 3 weeks I had still not received any written confirmation, I again contacted Robinson Way to enquire what was happening on this account. I was told that it had been passed back to HBOS to investigate.

 

3) On Monday 5 November 2007 I received a further telephone call from Robinson Way enquiring what I was planning to do as the account had been put on hold, I advised that I had telephoned Robinson Way some 3 weeks earlier to confirm that the debt was not my responsibility and that I had chased things up only a few days previously and was told that everything was back in the hands of HBOS. On relating this to your representative, I was told that this was NOT the case, and that I would need to confirm IN WRITING the reasons I was disputing the debt or alleging identity theft.

 

a) Why, at the time when I contacted Robinson Way by telephone to confirm this was not my debt was I not informed that I also had to confirm it in writing? Why was I also told that everything had been passed back to HBOS for investigation when it had not?

You will also notice that I have copied this letter to the Customer Care Manager at your Parent Company, London Scottish Bank PLC for their attention

Due to the distress and inconvenience this has caused over the last few months I am seriously considering highlighting the problems I have experienced with your company to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

I look forward to your urgent attention in this matter.

Yours faithfully,

 

Cc: Customer Care Manager, London Scottish Bank PLC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I think I'm finally getting somewhere with Rob Way.

 

Had confirmation from them that they accept that the debt is nothing to do with me.

 

Have also had some 27 address links taken off my credit report, linking me to these addresses in Essex.

 

All that is left for them to do now is remove the unauthorised searches from my credit reports and I think things may be about complete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would still complain to the FOS

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...