Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unauthorised Card Debit


Potos
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6037 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need help from anybody familiar with banking practices

A couple of days ago my son attempted to buy an annual season ticket at a railway station.

The ticket clerk told him that due to a problem with his card machine he would have to input the details manually.

He then rang to try for an authorisation code but said that he was unable to do so.

My son left the station and later that day went to another station to purchase his ticket. This time the transaction was refused because he had insufficient funds in his account.

He spoke to his bank who confirmed that the first clerk had been given an authorisation code twice and had attempted to debit my son's account 9 times.

He has reported this to the police who ,not surprisingly, are not interested

He has spoken to the station manger who has "promised an investigation"

The railway company say that it could take up to 10 days to return the money to his account

His bank claim that they are unable to refund the money until they receive authorisation from the railway's bank.

As this is an unauthorised deduction, my son did not sign anything or use his pin number, is his bank correct or are they obliged to do more.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure on this one but someone will know!

 

 

I had a simial situation but with a mail order firm. They said they could only process 1 item at a time so were going to make 4 transaction 1 for each item but they took the four individual and then another for the toal all together. I got the authorizations numbers and went into my bank who credited the account there and then.

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

After numerous phjone calls totherailway company somebody has finally taken the initiatice and sent a fax to my son's bank authorising a refund.

 

Now to kick some arse

Link to post
Share on other sites

why does he have to get over it its his money which as been took without his permission he has every right to complain about and demand a refund it wouldnt matter if its £2 or £2000 it is still his right to claim a refund

 

If you took the time to read the thread, they are doing the refund. Therefore whilst it was probably annoying at the time, someone made a mistake. However is it really worth getting all worked up about it now that it has been resolved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He spoke to his bank who confirmed that the first clerk had been given an authorisation code twice and had attempted to debit my son's account 9 times.

 

He has reported this to the police who, not surprisingly, are not interested

 

He has spoken to the station manger who has 'promised an investigation'

 

I think it's this issue that the OP is most concerned with. Why on earth did the clerk try nine times? Was the cardholder present at each attempt? I would expect the station manager to not only investigate this but to review training procedure; let's face it, if a card won't 'go through' twice (maybe at the most optimistic, thrice) then it won't 'go through', full stop. I would want full assurance from this manager that the clerk wasn't trying to access the account for their own purposes.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Demon, I think it was probably someone who kept swiping the card and not allowing the system to process it, hence the 9 times the bank said they tried to do so. It sounds like it is a training issue rather than a potential fraud issue, and yes it needs sorting out. However I don't think it is necessary for the OP "now time to kick some arse" attitude.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? It appears it was a simple operator error, as human beings some of us do make mistakes. Get over it and move on, life is far to short to get all uptight over something so damned trivial.

 

From the OP

 

He spoke to his bank who confirmed that the first clerk had been given an authorisation code twice and had attempted to debit my son's account 9 times.

And that is a simple operator mistake,,,,,,,,,,,,hhmmnn:o

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

i agree

 

i work at a shop and use the card terminal frequently, its the simplest thing in the world to use and attempting to debit the card 9 times with 2 authorisation codes is really shifty.

1290 back from the Halifax have it you scumbags

Link to post
Share on other sites

You son should contact his card issuer again. Insist these are disputed transactions and ask his card issuer to confirm that these transactions weren't authorised by PIN or by signature (the can't). Let your card issuer sort it out with the railway company, but ask them (card issuer) to furnish you with a crime number.

 

It could take a while, but his money should be returned.

 

I'd also tell your MP about the Police's lack of action (although it's not their fault).

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...