Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

*My credit file clear after 6 years ?


kathleenbilly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello and thanks for looking in,

 

I'm trying to understand my credit file and hope to have it clear possible in a year or two if that can be done. Let me explain.

 

I have various debts with credit cards about (three or four) and one CCJ from Barclays.

 

Now i haven't paid a penny to any of them and do not intend to, they have long given up trying to pursue me for money and i don't seem to even get any letters any more.

 

Now my question is this,

 

I'm working on the basis that after 6 years a company can no longer pursue you for a debt. So what may show on my file for example the CCJ after 6 years whether they got the money or not can no longer pursue me, and the CCJ has to be removed. Can somebody confirm this ? and if so, from what date does the 6 year time limit start from, ie: what date on my file do i need to be looking at ?

 

The same question for the credit cards when i defaulted ?

 

Basically im close to the 6 year time scale after this year on most of them so any advice would be greatly appreciated as to what to do and what to look for on my file which i have.

 

Regards

 

Billy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm working on the basis that after 6 years a company can no longer pursue you for a debt.

 

You could, in essence, be chased for the CCJ for ever although the creditor would need leave of the court to enforce if six years pass. There is plenty of caselaw arguing against the court giving leave, however. The actual CCJ will no longer appear on the credit file after six years, the court is likely to also get rid of it's record of the CCJ too.

 

For simple debts (unsecured loans, credit cards etc) with no CCJ attached, the limitation act provides that the six years would run from when action could first be brought against you, usually the point of default unless there has been a payment or written acknowledgement on your part since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could, in essence, be chased for the CCJ for ever although the creditor would need leave of the court to enforce if six years pass. There is plenty of caselaw arguing against the court giving leave, however.

 

For simple debts with no CCJ attached, the limitation act would run from when action could first be brought against you.

 

 

Firstly thanks for the reply, let me break it down so i understand correctly,

 

After 6 years a CCJ is no longer allowed to be shown on a credit file is this correct if so from which date do you look at. Very rarely would you be chased for a CCJ after the 6 year period as most companies would of written the debt off is this correct ?

 

 

Limitation act action against me etc ?

 

sorry bud this has gone right over my head could you explain in simple terms when the time limit starts and ends on a non-payment of a unsecured credit card default with regard to it being allowed to show on a credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 6 years a CCJ is no longer allowed to be shown on a credit file is this correct

yes it will only appear on the file for six years from the date of judgment, it could still exist past the six years though.

 

Very rarely would you be chased for a CCJ after the 6 year period as most companies would of written the debt off is this correct ?

if a creditor wanted to enforce a judgment after the six years they would either need the leave of the court for something like bailiffs or there would be a hearing involved where you could raise the time delay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry bud this has gone right over my head could you explain in simple terms when the time limit starts and ends on a non-payment of a unsecured credit card default with regard to it being allowed to show on a credit file.

 

the mark on the credit file would show up for six years from the last missed payment/default usually. are your agreements showing up as defaults?

 

apologies for the confusion by the way, i'm at work and trying to do two things at once!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it will only appear on the file for six years from the date of judgment, it could still exist past the six years though.

 

 

if a creditor wanted to enforce a judgment after the six years they would either need the leave of the court for something like bailiffs or there would be a hearing involved where you could raise the time delay.

 

 

OK now i'm getting somewhere so after 6 years it is removed automatically from the file by equafax from date of judgement from the court, or do you need to chase them up to remove it, i will see the date on my file so thanks for that info.

 

Now on credit cards this is the bit i need to fully understand what date do i need to be looking for these to be removed for non-payment ? Does it also start from the original default date ( basically when i stopped paying ) on these i notice they still update the information with the D sign on the file. Basically when and how long is it before these will drop off a file or be legally allowed to show.

 

I understand yes they all can on paper still chase you for this money but mostly they accept if the money has not been recovered within 6 years then they will not normally bother there after, and as i said will have written it off a long time ago.

 

For example my original debt was sold to a collection agency for maybe a few hundred pounds who may of stood the best chance of receiving money from me as the debt was fresh. However after 6 years of no luck recovering money what agency would then buy that debt in all honesty to also try to get money. Not many and that's why it does not happen hense the 6 years window period in this time a debt can be sold many times each time the value will reduce as the 6 year period approaches.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the mark on the credit file would show up for six years from the last missed payment/default usually. are your agreements showing up as defaults?

 

 

OK so the same applies yes they seem to be updating the information with the D (default) mountly but not on all of them i only have 4 credit cards non-payed the other do not seemed to be getting updated.

 

So again just to confirm i need to look at the last missed payment/default date it confuses me as there is a start date and an end date so take no notice of those dates only look at the missed payment/default date ?

 

So when i see this date (default date) i can add on 6 years then if your correct these should also drop off the file is this what your saying ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

post removed. I do not help thiefs. I do not condone their actions.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought that judgement creditors can apply for a unsatisified CCJ to be reregistered (although, not many do), so potentially, a CCJ could be on your credit record for longer than 6 years.

 

I didn't know that! Is that true?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your constant LOL's are meant to mean what?

 

This blanket answer i gave is not specific to you, try and scare you into what, paying, something you obviously decided not to do, thats your choice. The capitals is to warn any person that is thinking of avoiding debt deliberately.

 

Of course it seems quite clear to me that you have not heard of the National Fraud Initiative, and i'm not going to go into detail about it here.

 

Why you would want to compare the advice/comments on here to DCA's is beyond me, but then again its a moral's issue.

 

My instinct tells me that you deliberatly screwed the banks. Good!

 

Try not to compare honest comments to DCA's.

 

Enjoy your stolen cash.

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your constant LOL's are meant to mean what?

 

This blanket answer i gave is not specific to you, try and scare you into what, paying, something you obviously decided not to do, thats your choice. The capitals is to warn any person that is thinking of avoiding debt deliberately.

 

Of course it seems quite clear to me that you have not heard of the National Fraud Initiative, and i'm not going to go into detail about it here.

 

Why you would want to compare the advice/comments on here to DCA's is beyond me, but then again its a moral's issue.

 

My instinct tells me that you deliberatly screwed the banks. Good!

 

Try not to compare honest comments to DCA's.

 

Enjoy your stolen cash.

 

 

Fair comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought that judgement creditors can apply for a unsatisified CCJ to be reregistered (although, not many do), so potentially, a CCJ could be on your credit record for longer than 6 years.

 

The reason not many do, is the debt has been sold off as i said ealier so the original creditor has long moved on from the original debt and even probably claimed the money back via there own insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information i'm looking forward to building back my credit from next year.

 

I took various credit cards and Barclays Bank for a total of 65,000

 

I paid not a penny back. Only Barclays tried attachment of earnings so i completed the form sent by the court and then left that job. :p

 

Because i do not own property in this country the whole process was easier for me to not pay.

 

I now have a cash account with Alliance @ Leicester which works exactly like a bank account with direct debits but you don't need a credit check to get it.

 

I also have a credit card with Virgin Mastercard which works like any other credit card but you top it up as you go.

 

My credit will be clear next year as far as my file is concerned.

 

Looking back its been an inconvenience but maybe i should of taken them for more. 8)

 

I don't condone taking money and not paying it back this is just my story but trust me they can afford it ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As we are not willing to assist you in committing fraud I am closing this thread.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if your honest with yourself then you will be always looking over your shoulder, you may not show this front to other people but there will always be that fear.

 

I am not trying to scare you into anything, quite frankly I couldnt care less if you pay this debt or not !! it doesnt affect me, only you!

 

But I do think you need to be aware of possible consequences, as you quite rightly say, this may not be the case, BUT it may be the case.

 

Do you honestly believe the creditors will just forget about it? I dont think so.

 

Good luck:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK a CCJ never becomes 'Statute Barred' & although they do have to apply to the court to enforce it after 6 years, there is nothing stopping them marking it on your credit file for-ever!

 

Really for ever! wow seriously i am so worried you have said that! my god i will never get credit ever my life is ruined!

 

Where did you learn words like Statute Barred ?

 

You made me laugh just like the letters i used to receive from debt collection agencies about what they were going to do to me Bah Bah Bah.

 

I've still got the 60 grand pal. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information i'm looking forward to building back my credit from next year.

 

I took various credit cards and Barclays Bank for a total of 65,000

 

I paid not a penny back. Only Barclays tried attachment of earnings so i completed the form sent by the court and then left that job. :p

 

Because i do not own property in this country the whole process was easier for me to not pay.

 

So you are admitting you borrowed the money and have no intention of paying it back? Nice...

Link to post
Share on other sites

My story is an interesting one I had a good job a nice house with a mortgage just like you.

 

Everybody wanted to lend to me, cards banks all of them, you can imagine, all my best friends it seemed especially when i had a house to lose.

 

After two years i had used and spend all money lent to me and found i was unable to pay back what i had borrowed. It was a crap time when this reality became my life.

 

I was angry stupid enough to put myself in this situation and equally angry the money was offered up so easily.

 

So i the turned the negative into a positive, sold my house brought property abroad, run up 60 grand further of debt banked abroad and rented a property and payed back nothing given my borrowing was all unsercured there was nothing any of them could do.

 

The rest is history next year my file is clear as a result I'm very comfortable so thanks Barclays, MBNA, Capital One and all the others to whom i owe my thanks for the easiest money i will ever get.

 

Never was i going to let these corporations who don't give a toss ruin my life,

 

Life's too short for that it's all just a system so play it as you will. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone "doesn't give a toss", it appears to be YOU.

You have deliberately run up debt, knowing full well that you had no intention of paying it back.

And you are asking us to assist you in this exercise?

Please take note that the CAG has never and will never condone debt avoidance.

 

But there is one thing that you can be sure of, one day it will catch up with you.

 

This thread is directly opposed to the values that the CAG stand for.

 

Rooster UK.

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

So i the turned the negative into a positive, sold my house brought property abroad, run up 60 grand further of debt banked abroad and rented a property and payed back nothing given my borrowing was all unsercured there was nothing any of them could do.
Just to clarify, this is fraud persuant to Sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006.

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2006/pdf/ukpga_20060035_en.pdf

2 Fraud by false representation

(1) A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and

(b) intends, by making the representation—

B

2 Fraud Act 2006 (c. 35)

(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2) A representation is false if—

(a) it is untrue or misleading, and

(b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.

(3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—

(a) the person making the representation, or

(b) any other person.

(4) A representation may be express or implied.

(5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention).

3 Fraud by failing to disclose information

A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he is

under a legal duty to disclose, and

(b) intends, by failing to disclose the information—

(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

And... An act of fraud cannot become Statute barred persay the limitation Act 1980.
Link to post
Share on other sites

For further clarification, even apart from the Fraud Act, this does fall into the category of Common Law fraud, and the courts will give you no support or aid whatsoever.

 

You are, in my view, a common criminal, and I hope you get no help on this site.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...