Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GE Money Mortgage and repossession


The Analyst
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4839 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When I represented my friend at a repossession hearing we filled in forms for both her and her partner - took us ages - and the judge didn't even ask to see them:confused:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every one needs to do what they think is best for them as litigants in person in nearly every case the judge will put you right if you make a mistake in the early stages its later that you have to be correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

An update on current situation.

We'd forgotton that we had payment protection insurance on the mortgage payments. We claimed and the insurers have sent over £6000 to GE Money to cover payments from November last year to October this year. So, theoretically, the arrears have been settled and there is enough left over to pay the next 11 months payments.

As we'd made proper payments until we went in to arrears in August we reckon that they either owe us over £4000 after the arrears payments are taken or should use that balance to cover future monthly payments.

BUT... GE money have not acknowledged that they have received the money (I have letters from the insurers that the money was sent) and the case is still ongoing on Tuesday.

Can they still go ahead regardless?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, good to hear you got the payment protection payment... that will make all the difference to your case.

 

You need to ring GE tomorrow morning and get them to acknowledge the payment has been made. If you have a fax machine, ask them to fax confirmation to you and to the court. You then need to ring the court and ask for their fax number to send them the letter from the insurers so they can put it with the papers for the judge (assuming GE haven't cancelled the case.

 

However, unless you have it in writing from either GE money or the court, you should still turn up on Tuesday. If all arrears payments have been made there is no case for possession, there is only a case if you are in arrears, but given that GE money have not confirmed this to you they may well not have cancelled the hearing.

 

Let us know tomorrow after you have rung GE.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I would agree with Ell-en - in fact I would go to court even if they do say the money has been paid - I wouldn't trust them not to try and sneak a suspended possession.

 

You haven't said whether the PPI was through GE. If it was then I would say they have been severely negligent. At the very least you want the repossession costs refunded to your account and any defaults recorded to be removed.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely Goldlady -that's what I meant to say

 

You should go to the court on Tuesday no matter what.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've already e-mailed copies of the 2 letters from the insurers to the court using the e-filing system.

The Insurance Company is First National (which I'm sure you know is part of GE Money - even the address is the same!!). The 2 payments of £3,226 each were actually for the 12 month period up to and including November 2006, not as I stated in my last posting.

Doesn't make any difference, though, we were up to date with payments during this period too.

Just putting the final touches to our paperwork for Tuesday (appendices currently stand at 9 and about 1cm thick).

 

The Analyst

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Insurance Company is First National (which I'm sure you know is part of GE Money - even the address is the same!!).

 

:eek: It seems that GE Money need to go and stand in the naughty corner. Whether the judge will be able to do anything if the hearing does go ahead is debatable - but they need to be punished for what they have done to you.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question.

If GE Money have received the £6000+ what are they allowed to do with the balance after taking away the arrears? Can they keep it and use it as future payments, just take it off the outstanding balance, or should they send us a cheque for the difference?

 

The Analyst

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm - if they take it off the o/s balance they will probably charge you for paying in advance:mad:. It is your money really as you managed to pay part of the payments for the period covered by the insurance. So they should send it back to you. In my opinion anyway.

 

Incidentally you also need to reclaim all the £40 charges - I am claiming mine back once I have repaid my GE loan (next week hopefully:D).

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, despite my best efforts I was unable to talk to GE Money about the £6000 in cheques they should have received.

Either I got the musak for ten minutes or was cut off with the 'we are very busy, please call back later' message.

There was nothing in the post from them today and the case is still shown as open on the PCOL website.

So we don't know if they have ever received the money.

I would have thought that it would be very naughty of them to go ahead if they have the money; it's more likely that the cheques never arrived from the insurers (their own company).

Looks like it might be a nice surprise for their Solicitor tomorrow when they read our letter from the insurers.

I suppose the Judge will adjourn the case so that GE Money can find the cheques?

 

The Analyst

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you go tomorrow be prepared for anything and remeber to say that you have tried to confirm that they have had the £6000, and it is their error and you should not be liable for costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to throw the book at them - make sure you tell the judge everything that has happened to you. Chances are they will have a solicitor there ( or in the case I went on it was a bit of a kid in an extremely short mini skirt;)) who has absolutely no idea about the case and just expects the repossession to be rubber stamped. When we told her our defence she was horrified and had to disappear to make calls to her boss and the client.

 

Best of luck - be strong - and I hope you don't get wobbly legs on the way into the court - I did and I was only helping my friend :D

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

A small victory for the Consumer.

Attended court and took up the offer of free legal representation. When shown the letters from the insurers she stated we should not have been there. She went off to find GE Money's representative but he was on the phone so wasn't told about the letters before we went into the Judge's chambers.

GE Money's agent, Mr Eagles, said his bit - in arrears, wanting possession of the house, etc; etc. Our Solicitor then passed the letters to the Judge, who, having read them out loud said, "So Mr and Mrs .... are in credit?" He then looked over his glasses and said to GE Money, " I assume you know nothing about this, Mr Eagles?" To which Mr Eagles replied, "No Sir, I certainly do not, no." We tried not to smile too much.

Case stood down whilst hasty phone were calls made to GE Money HQ.

Back in Chambers half an hour later - GE Money never received the cheques.

Case adjourned for 14 days, but more likely until after Christmas, to allow GE Money and Insurers time to find the missing cheques.

Apologies from the Judge for wasting our time.

Lunch in the Court Cafe.

 

It's still not over yet; need to see what GE Money do next.

Thanks to all who have helped with this case so far.

I'll update again once GE Money have been in touch. I want to make sure that we get the balance from the insurance.

 

The Analyst

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic news Analyst - OH and I have just had a good laugh trying to picture Mr Eagles' face! I bet the judge said it with real judicial sarcasm as well.:p

 

Keep us posted on developments.

 

Goldlady

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

great news get the insureres to check if the cheques have been cashed and when you go back make sure you do not get hit for there costs, rgardless whether they have cost indemnity they have to be reasonable and them cocking it up is not reasonableget the case dismissed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

We're back in Court tomorrow morning. GE Money's Solicitors have written to us stating that they are going to ask for the case to be adjourned again (!).

I can only assume they have still not found the cheques.

We're going to Court even though their letter states there is no need to do so. We want to find out what's going on with them.

My wife can certainly do without this!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are paying GE off this Friday YIPPEEEE:D. They know this and they are STILL giving us grief about making a payment. In spite of being told that as long as the loan is settled by the 18th there are no further charges owing.

 

I can't wait to have my day in court reclaiming the money they owe me. I would never advise anyone to take a loan with GE.

 

I am sure you will be OK again in court Analyst, they have behaved so badly. Best of luck.

  • Haha 1

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - paid the B*****s off today - YIPPEEEEEEEEEE! Let battle commence.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SG. Analyst how was court today? Please tell us it went OK.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for the delay in replying.

 

Went back to Court.

Judge told us that the case was now finished as GE Money had 'come to an agreement'. I asked what this meant; Judge just said that the arrears had been paid and the case was adjourned indefinitely, but not dismissed.

I assume that means that as long as we keep up payments no further action will be taken, but if we default again it's back to Court.

Consequently, a few days later we received a cheque from GE Money for just over £3200. The other £3200, kept by GE Money, covers the arrears, December's payment and the next 3 or 4 payments. Whether that's legal or not I don't know, but it keeps them off our back for a while. They have yet to write to us to let us know if this is what is actually happening with the money.

Anyway, at least we can now have a Christmas.

Thanks again for all your advice.

In the end I didn't need to use all the paperwork I'd put together.

Once the compensation claim is finalised we can pay off GE Money then start claiming back their charges!

 

Merry Christmas to all who celebrate it and I'll be back here again should anything else go pear-shaped money wise.

 

The Analyst

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...