Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Intek/orange


Darren
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I entered into a contract with Intek Torquay branch 22nd Sept. The phone I wanted was not in stock, and was collected the following wednesday by my wife. She asked about my phone number and was told it would take up to two weeks to transfer. I didn't want to pay line rental on both phones so I immediately rang Orange, and was told that they had not been given my PAC code. I gave them the code and my number was ported the following wednesday. the following morning I had a text saying I had 3 voicemails (all were left the wednesday evening) and was unsure why the phone had not rang. when I got home that evening I realised that I cant get a signal at home. I called Orange and they confirmed that the signal in my area cannot be guaranteed. I told them that I wanted to cancel, they agreed as I was well within my 14 day cooling off period.

 

I canceled in writing with the store (also sent a copy to head office and Orange) I received a call from the person who I dealt with at the store who promised to sort it out and cancel the contract. She called me again on the saturday and told me nothing could be done until monday, so she would call me again monday to sort it out.

 

Monday - no call

Tuesday - I called and was told someone will call me back

Wed - no call

Thurs -I called and was told someone will call me back

Fri - I called Orange complaints dept. she rang intek and arranged for me to take the phone back.

Sat - I took phone back to store and they refused to accept it

 

I have called, written (sent recorded), faxed and emailed - they are still ignoring me, and Orange are still being a bit of a pain saying they cant do anything without the stores permission.

 

 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any ideas?

 

Not really, you don't have a legal right to return the phone.

 

Mobile phone contracts are service agreements not credit agreements and are not covered by the Consumer Credit Act, this means you don't have a cooling off period unless the shop or the network want to offer one to you.

 

If you returned the phone to the store within 14 days they'd probably have cancelled it for you, but from what your saying you sent them a letter within 14 days which they responded to, asking to return the phone, yet you didn't actually take the phone back to the store until the 14 October, when you purchased it on 22 September?? At least that's how I'm reading your post.

 

From the look of it you've had the phone in your possession for 22 days after you bought it. The shop won't cancel anything until your stood there phone in hand waiting to give it back, its just common sense as otherwise the contract would be cancelled, they'd lose their comission and there is nothing to stop you dissapearing off into the distance with the phone, your just going to have to argue it out with the shop and see if they will let you cancel the contract.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Inclined to agree. By still having the phone in your possession you lose your rights to return (even under SOGA) as your contract does not guarantee service everywhere. That said, Orange may be able to assist, but not let you walk away from the contract. Contact them, as your dealer has done all they can be reasonably expected to have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, you don't have a legal right to return the phone. .

 

Yes I do, I have now had legal advice

 

If you returned the phone to the store within 14 days they'd probably have cancelled it for you, but from what your saying you sent them a letter within 14 days which they responded to, asking to return the phone, yet you didn't actually take the phone back to the store until the 14 October, when you purchased it on 22 September?? At least that's how I'm reading your post..

 

I did ask what they wanted done with the phone, both in the cancellation letter and when I received the call from them, I was told to keep it until they had sorted out the cancellation. It was Orange that arranged for me to return the phone, and when I did Intek refused it.

 

your just going to have to argue it out with the shop and see if they will let you cancel the contract.

 

There is no arguing, I have now had legal advice and have writen to the MD at Head office, as they are in breach of contract.

 

All has been agreed with Orange, but they still need the cancellation from the store.

 

I agree about still having the phone but I cannot force them to take it back.

 

Orange said I could post it special delivery but that won't guarantee they'll cancel the contract.

 

Intek have said that if I take a new contract with a different network they will cancel the Orange one, but it has been 2 letters, 4 emails and 7 phone calls and they still haven't called or written to me.

 

Would you sign another contract with a company like that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Orange are not in breach of contract, Intek are.

 

I told the girl at the shop that I am a plumber and I cover 'call outs' therefore a good signal was more important than price, she told me that orange had the best signal in the area and it was better than o2 who I was already with. This was only verbal but she has since left a message on the phone confirming this, which I have recorded. I also asked for a 12 month contract and signed a 12 month contract, but when I offered to buy out the contract orange tell me its 18 months, although I have been told that they cannot hold me to that as the agreement signed clearly states 12 months.

 

Orange have agreed everything and told me that they are ready to issue my PAC code as soon as they hear from Intek, and assure me I will get my number back. This is what has been worrying me most as I have had it a long time and alot of my customers only have that number

 

I am going to buy a PAYG mobile on o2 tommorow and have the number transfered so I wont miss any more call outs, as I have missed a couple already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Problem sotred.

 

I had a reply from Intek saying that I signed a form in which I agreed to the following term:

 

"I agree that I am only able to cancel my contract within the initial 14 day period, and only where a new contract is taken out as a replacement prior to the cancellation taking place."

 

I replied to tell them that this is an unfair term under the UTCCR 1999(as advised by Consumer Direct) and it does not apply in this case as it was them that breached the contract.

 

I also sent Orange a letter saying how fed up I was with their refusal to intervene.

 

Last week I received a reply from Intek saying that all their terms are legal and above board, and taking legal action would be futile as there was no legal case to answer - where do they get such professional sounding legal terms from?

 

I then spoke to Consumer Direct again and on their advice started drafting an N1. When it was nearly complete I had a call from Orange Executive office, who agreed to cancel the contract asked for the IMEI no and 5 mins later I had a PAC code. Today my number has been transfered and the phone sent back (to Orange).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tks - the EO was normally in Bristol (where the Executives used to hide out)! I then heard Darlington were fielding these matters and I wondered if that had happened to you.... looks like it has been transferred. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...