Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Intek/orange


Darren
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6007 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I entered into a contract with Intek Torquay branch 22nd Sept. The phone I wanted was not in stock, and was collected the following wednesday by my wife. She asked about my phone number and was told it would take up to two weeks to transfer. I didn't want to pay line rental on both phones so I immediately rang Orange, and was told that they had not been given my PAC code. I gave them the code and my number was ported the following wednesday. the following morning I had a text saying I had 3 voicemails (all were left the wednesday evening) and was unsure why the phone had not rang. when I got home that evening I realised that I cant get a signal at home. I called Orange and they confirmed that the signal in my area cannot be guaranteed. I told them that I wanted to cancel, they agreed as I was well within my 14 day cooling off period.

 

I canceled in writing with the store (also sent a copy to head office and Orange) I received a call from the person who I dealt with at the store who promised to sort it out and cancel the contract. She called me again on the saturday and told me nothing could be done until monday, so she would call me again monday to sort it out.

 

Monday - no call

Tuesday - I called and was told someone will call me back

Wed - no call

Thurs -I called and was told someone will call me back

Fri - I called Orange complaints dept. she rang intek and arranged for me to take the phone back.

Sat - I took phone back to store and they refused to accept it

 

I have called, written (sent recorded), faxed and emailed - they are still ignoring me, and Orange are still being a bit of a pain saying they cant do anything without the stores permission.

 

 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any ideas?

 

Not really, you don't have a legal right to return the phone.

 

Mobile phone contracts are service agreements not credit agreements and are not covered by the Consumer Credit Act, this means you don't have a cooling off period unless the shop or the network want to offer one to you.

 

If you returned the phone to the store within 14 days they'd probably have cancelled it for you, but from what your saying you sent them a letter within 14 days which they responded to, asking to return the phone, yet you didn't actually take the phone back to the store until the 14 October, when you purchased it on 22 September?? At least that's how I'm reading your post.

 

From the look of it you've had the phone in your possession for 22 days after you bought it. The shop won't cancel anything until your stood there phone in hand waiting to give it back, its just common sense as otherwise the contract would be cancelled, they'd lose their comission and there is nothing to stop you dissapearing off into the distance with the phone, your just going to have to argue it out with the shop and see if they will let you cancel the contract.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Inclined to agree. By still having the phone in your possession you lose your rights to return (even under SOGA) as your contract does not guarantee service everywhere. That said, Orange may be able to assist, but not let you walk away from the contract. Contact them, as your dealer has done all they can be reasonably expected to have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, you don't have a legal right to return the phone. .

 

Yes I do, I have now had legal advice

 

If you returned the phone to the store within 14 days they'd probably have cancelled it for you, but from what your saying you sent them a letter within 14 days which they responded to, asking to return the phone, yet you didn't actually take the phone back to the store until the 14 October, when you purchased it on 22 September?? At least that's how I'm reading your post..

 

I did ask what they wanted done with the phone, both in the cancellation letter and when I received the call from them, I was told to keep it until they had sorted out the cancellation. It was Orange that arranged for me to return the phone, and when I did Intek refused it.

 

your just going to have to argue it out with the shop and see if they will let you cancel the contract.

 

There is no arguing, I have now had legal advice and have writen to the MD at Head office, as they are in breach of contract.

 

All has been agreed with Orange, but they still need the cancellation from the store.

 

I agree about still having the phone but I cannot force them to take it back.

 

Orange said I could post it special delivery but that won't guarantee they'll cancel the contract.

 

Intek have said that if I take a new contract with a different network they will cancel the Orange one, but it has been 2 letters, 4 emails and 7 phone calls and they still haven't called or written to me.

 

Would you sign another contract with a company like that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Orange are not in breach of contract, Intek are.

 

I told the girl at the shop that I am a plumber and I cover 'call outs' therefore a good signal was more important than price, she told me that orange had the best signal in the area and it was better than o2 who I was already with. This was only verbal but she has since left a message on the phone confirming this, which I have recorded. I also asked for a 12 month contract and signed a 12 month contract, but when I offered to buy out the contract orange tell me its 18 months, although I have been told that they cannot hold me to that as the agreement signed clearly states 12 months.

 

Orange have agreed everything and told me that they are ready to issue my PAC code as soon as they hear from Intek, and assure me I will get my number back. This is what has been worrying me most as I have had it a long time and alot of my customers only have that number

 

I am going to buy a PAYG mobile on o2 tommorow and have the number transfered so I wont miss any more call outs, as I have missed a couple already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Problem sotred.

 

I had a reply from Intek saying that I signed a form in which I agreed to the following term:

 

"I agree that I am only able to cancel my contract within the initial 14 day period, and only where a new contract is taken out as a replacement prior to the cancellation taking place."

 

I replied to tell them that this is an unfair term under the UTCCR 1999(as advised by Consumer Direct) and it does not apply in this case as it was them that breached the contract.

 

I also sent Orange a letter saying how fed up I was with their refusal to intervene.

 

Last week I received a reply from Intek saying that all their terms are legal and above board, and taking legal action would be futile as there was no legal case to answer - where do they get such professional sounding legal terms from?

 

I then spoke to Consumer Direct again and on their advice started drafting an N1. When it was nearly complete I had a call from Orange Executive office, who agreed to cancel the contract asked for the IMEI no and 5 mins later I had a PAC code. Today my number has been transfered and the phone sent back (to Orange).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tks - the EO was normally in Bristol (where the Executives used to hide out)! I then heard Darlington were fielding these matters and I wondered if that had happened to you.... looks like it has been transferred. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...