Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all can anyone tell me if they have had a credit card claim refused by the halifax.Its just i was of work from January to June 2006 and again from October till January 2007 with a knee injury and had two ops on it and cuold not work as i was on crutches.I did not know i could put a claim in for my protection on my credit card untill someone mentiond it to me.So i rang the halifax they told me i could claim for both periods just back date it sent me all the details ect did what they wanted doctors medical reports,paid for them ect and sent them off in July 2007.Then i got a letter saying they are looking in to the claim and just waiting for reports from my Dr in August.Then i got another saying the same in september.So i rang them to see what was going on as i had alredy sent them my reports,they told me the claim will go through when they recieve the reports from my doctors again and will be proccesed as soon as they recieve this information.Then on Friday just gone i got a letter from them saying my claim is not going to be proccesd due to the details that have been presented to them show that you had this condition when the policy began on 10th January 2004.Medical records show you previously consulted a medical practitioner in relation to this condition or related condition on 2nd October 2002 and 9th January 2004.Pre existing conditions are excluded because the increased risk they represent.Where a conditin is existing when a policy begins or where it reqired consultation or treatment during the 12 months before the start of the policy.The thing is i have had surgery on my knee for ligiment and cartlage damege since i was 21 years i have had fluid draind from my knee a couple of times when it has flaird up.But this time i twisted it at work on the 9th Dec 2006 my last day of work then it swole up so i went to the hospital to see if they could drain it wich they did it was fine again as normal.Then working at home i was under the floor working and kneeling down and it flaird up so i went back they did the same to cut a long story short they did not know why it kept flairing up and would not drain it incase of an infection geting in.In the meen time i was in so much pain they told me i had to keep my waight of it and use crutches,pain killers as it was so bad while i waited for a rmi scan to see what the problem was and i got that in March 17th wich showd cartlage and crucial ligament damage and told me i could carry on as it is if they inject steroids in to stop it flaring up again wich they did so i ended up in a wheel chair for 4 days in hospital and then it was a case of build my muscls up no physio and had to wate to see if the company doctor would let me back to work.June 13th back to work still a bit of pain not much went back to see consultant who was not happy that i could not straighten my leg and wanted me to go back in to hospital for an operation to remove the cartlage and shave round the knee cap so i could get my leg straighter,October 9th back in hospital for the op only two days and back out and phisio up untill i was reliesed as i sterted jogging jumping ect no problems built the muscles up all fine now.So i do not understand why the Halifax will not pay me out and why do i pay the protection cover and while i was off i still kept up payments even though i was struggeling i must of mist a couple by the due date and got charged for them but always kept paying.So as you can probebly understand i am not very happy with them and was hoping if any one knew what i can do about this.I sent one of to mbna at the same time no problems they just paid up and my norwich union insurance no problems its just the Halifax can you send any sugestions on what i can do about this as i feel imm been ript off by them thank you Ajk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical PPI [problem] it's not worth the paper it's written on. Now you need to reclaim all of the PPI payments because they have miss sold it to you. they even sent you a letter to prove it. You should have been asked if you had any PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS when the PPI was sold to you.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris W

this is very sound advice :cool:

i have just claimed a ppi refund for the same reason PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS so lets hope Ajk gets it sorted .

I did mine over the phone to a very nervous Lloyds employee (they couldn't sort it quick enough)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i have just rung the hallifax and they told me i have to put in all down in writing and send it to them.Any one know what to write down or the best thing to say to them ie is it a threatening letter or a complaints letter thanks ajk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This should get you started. It's not my work i found it a couple of months ago on here. sorry I don't know who the author was. But it has a lot of good information and some letters

PAYMENT PROTECTION INSURANCE

 

 

Before reclaiming or cancelling PPI you should have a look at the following Notes and see what type of PPI you actually have. Always consider all the facts and figures before starting a claim.. Whatever you do Do Not Just Jump In without researching your own policy, and don’t be afraid to ask for help / advice on the forums on CAG.

 

 

There are basically 2 types of Payment protection Insurance policies.

 

1) Monthly paid premium (as used by most of the credit card companies)

These policies should not be a big problem to cancel; normally they will cancel this type of policy if you write to them or Phone them. Of course if you consider that you have been mis sold this type of policy you can of course try and reclaim all the premiums that have been made, plus claim the interest on each payment at the Contractual Interest Rate.

 

2) Single Premium Policy (these are the biggest rip off ones) These policies are

Paid for in full to the insurance company at the start of the policy. Most loan

Companies will finance the full cost of the policy by adding the cost onto your loan. What they do not tell you is that you will also be paying interest on that amount at the loan interest rate for the full term of the loan.

 

Example 1. PPI Cost £3300 Interest Rate 7.9%APR Interest payable over the 5 year loan = £1300 Actual cost of PPI cover £ 4600.00

 

Example 2 PPI Cost £3300 Interest Rate 7.9%APR Interest payable over the 15 year loan = £3913.00 Actual Cost of 5yr PPI Cover £ 7213.00

 

As some loans have variable APR the costs used in the above examples could be in fact a lot higher.

 

Most of this type of Policy will cover you for 60 Months (5yrs) so beware if you have taken out one of these policies and have a loan which runs over the 5 year period. As in example 2 you would require a further 2 * 5yr PPI policies to cover the full loan period.

 

I did one calculation on an original loan of £17,000.00 , when the PPI was added and calculated to cover the 15yr period; with an APR at 7.9% fixed the actual cost to repay the loan was calculated at almost £55,000.00.

 

Cancelling a single payment Policy, This can be a bit trickier than a standard monthly paid policy. These policies will offer a very small percentage of the premium should you just cancel it. An example of this is shown below. Their answer to this part is normally that the insurance premium pays more in the early stages of the loan as there is higher risk. (Yeah - higher risk to the lender and not the Customer)

 

£3300 policy which had been running for 3yrs, Refund of £97.00 if cancelled.

 

Some companies will state that the only way that you can cancel one of these policies is to refinance and settle the complete loan agreement with a new loan without PPI on the new loan. Some of the lenders will also try and fob you off with excuses like, you may not get a new loan at the same low %APR without PPI. Some will also state that you may not in fact be able to obtain a new loan from them at all; this of course is all scare tactics to try and make you change your mind about cancelling the loan etc. If your credit rating is not good then they will use this against you too.

 

In my own case I managed to obtain a new loan from another provider at a far better %APR (5.8%) rate without PPI, though they did really try and sell their PPI..lol. I also took out a stand alone PPI policy from an Independent provider at well under a tenth of the cost I was quoted from the new Lender. Personally I have nothing against PPI Insurance, in fact I think it is a good thing as long as it sold properly and not at an extortionate rate like it is by the major High Street Banks and Loan Companies.

 

3) Mis Sold Policy The mis selling of these policies is a major concern not just for

Consumer but in fact the FSA and the OFT are looking into this whole

matter.

 

Have you been Mis Sold PPI. (Some standard Conditions for PPI)

 

a) Payment Protection Insurance cannot be made a condition of obtaining a loan. (This is the most common reason for mis selling)

b) You are permantley resident within the United Kingdom

c) You are Over 18 and Under 65 at the commencement of your loan, and you will not reach the age of 70 during the insured term.

d) You are in Full time employment – Some policies define Full time employment as being working Over 16 Hours per week and that you have been in full time employment for at least 6 Months prior to the start date of the policy.

e) Pre Excisting Medical Conditions may also Invalidate your Policy

f) Some policies may cover if you are self employed.. Check your T & C first though.

 

** Latest Additions to be added to above (thanks Todge)**

 

1 You were not in work or self employed at the time of sale

 

2 You were told that you had to take the PPI out at the same time as the loan or not at all

 

3 You were not asked whether you had any other insurance which would cover the loan

 

4 You were not told you could buy PPI elsewhere to cover the loan

 

5 You were sold a policy which had age restrictions which you fell outside of

 

6 You were led to believe that Payment Protection Insurance was compulsory

 

7 You were told that you would stand more chance of getting the loan if you took the Payment Protection Insurance

 

8 It was not explained to you that there were certain exclusions within the policy that could affect you

 

9 You were pressured into buying the PPI

 

10 You paid upfront for the PPI but it was not explained that there were some PPI policies where you could pay monthly

 

11 Your PPI was an upfront premium and you repaid the loan early and received no refund

 

12 You increased your loan and the PPI was increased automatically

 

13 The Terms & Conditions of the small print were not fully explained to you

 

 

You should in the first instance read through the full terms and conditions of your Payment Protection Insurance Policy. If you do not have these I would personally advise you to contact the Insurer and request these. If you do have to contact the Insurer for a copy of the terms and conditions you will need to know the date that you signed up for the policy, Request a copy of the terms and conditions relating to the policy that they had in place on that date.

 

I would personally always deal with complaints regarding PPI by way of letter, unless you have the ability to record any telephone conversations regarding the complaint.

Obviously should you have to take the complaint to court, the more evidence you have in writing the better.

 

Some Interesting Facts Regarding PPI.

 

On some Single premium PPI policies the actual cost for the insurance can be a low as 10% of the cost charged by the lender …That’s a whopping 90% straight profit for the lender.. Plus of course the extra Interest that they will make.

 

Out of all the types of Insurances Policies available ( Car, Home etc) PPI has the lowest percentage of payout in claims, Making PPI the most profitable Insurance Policy currently on the market.

 

Payment Protection Insurance has the highest rate of claims for Mis Selling than any other Insurance policy available.

 

Most policies will only pay out for 12 Months maximum in any 1 claim.

 

 

I hope this has helped, If you have any queries please do not be afraid to ask for help or advise in the forum.

 

If you find any Interesting information relating to PPI I would be grateful if you could pass it on to me, I’m on a bit of a Mission with PPI..lol

 

Additions to Post 22/3/07..

 

 

Reclaim your PPI premiums

 

There's no need to pay someone a fee to pursue your mis-selling claim. By following our guide - and using our letter template - you can right the wrongs committed by your bank or lender. You will find the downloadable letters at the bottom of this page.

Here we explain how to decide whether you have a case for reclaiming your premiums, and how to go about it:

The background

Payment protection insurance generates billions of pounds for banks and building societies and is widely recognised as being routinely mis-sold. The policies are designed to repay a particular debt if you find yourself out of work. We know of many instances when borrowers have been forced to buy an expensive policy as a condition of being offered a loan.

{I:1}

Do you have a mis-selling claim?

• Being forced to buy a PPI policy in conjunction with a loan does not breach Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. guidelines. But the FSA says that fact does not exclude borrowers from making a mis-selling complaint to the Financial Ombudsman, who assesses whether the way the policy was sold was fair and reasonable.

Banks and lenders who subscribe to the Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. agree they will not force customers to also buy their Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. insurance, but they can insist on them having some form of PPI.

We have heard a litany of complaints from borrowers who say unscrupulous salespeople told them they would not get a loan unless they signed up to the lender's own protection insurance. If this has happened to you, you should pursue the bank through its usual complaints process. If you have no success, the next step is to complain the Financial Ombudsman.

• You may also have a case for mis-selling if you have been sold a policy while you are self-employed, unemployed or retired – all of which make PPI void. PPI policies are valid only for people who are employed by someone else and the lender or insurer should have checked your employment status when they sold the policy.

• Most policies do not cover you for loss of income caused by a wide range of illnesses or ailments, including mental illness and back trouble, which keep thousands of people off work each year. A lender or insurer should warn you that illnesses like these, and other pre-existing conditions that might keep you off work, will not be covered.

• If a lender sells you a PPI policy with a card or loan, it significantly increases the interest rate you will be paying. Lenders are obliged to advertise the total Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. so you know exactly how much your monthly repayments – including insurance – will be. If they haven't, you can pursue them for mis-selling.

The lender should also have explained to you the full cost of the policy, and how your monthly repayments without insurance would be affected by adding insurance to the loan or credit card agreement.

If your lender did not do any of these things, you may have a claim for mis-selling.

Additionally, you may have a claim if you have tried to cancel your PPI policy, and have been refused, or if you have cancelled the policy part-way through the loan period and received a smaller reduction in monthly payments than you were expecting.

 

 

Template Letter 1

 

 

[Your address]

The Complaints Department

[Lender’s address]

[Date]

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Ref: [Your PPI policy number]

 

I believe I have been mis-sold a payment protection insurance policy and would like to request a full refund of my premiums, plus interest paid.

 

I took out a £xxx loan/credit card at your […. Branch] on [date] and also bought a payment protection policy which would cost me an extra £xxx over the life of the loan. [The name of the salesperson who sold me the policy is ...] The total amount of my premiums plus interest is £ xxxx.

 

I am [self-employed/work as a contractor/unemployed/retired] and therefore will not be eligible for any payments from the PPI if I find myself unable to meet my debt repayments.

 

Possible additional paragraphs – include the one which applies

 

 

[Your salesperson knew this at the time of sale but did not point out to me that this would make the insurance policy useless to me.]

 

 

or

 

[Your salesperson did not check my personal circumstances at the time of sale, which they are under obligation to do. If they had done, they would have realised that a PPI policy was useless to me.]

 

 

Insurers are under an obligation to ensure that the policy they are selling is appropriate to that customer and clearly, as my employment situation means I am unable to claim on the policy, you have not fulfilled this requirement.

 

I am requesting a full refund of all my insurance payments, plus interest, which total [£ xxx].

 

If I do not receive a favourable response from you I will pursue this claim through the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

[Your signature]

 

 

 

Template Letter 2

 

 

 

[Your address]

The Complaints Department

[Lender’s address]

[Date]

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Ref – policy number

 

I believe I have been mis-sold a payment protection insurance policy and would like to request a full refund of my premiums, plus interest paid.

 

I took out a £xxx loan/credit card at your [branch name] branch on [date] and also bought a payment protection policy which would cost me an extra £xxx over the life of the loan. [The name of the salesperson who sold me the policy is …] The total amount of my premiums plus interest is £ xxxx.

 

When I took out the loan, I was told that my application would be refused if I did not also buy a PPI policy. The Financial Services Authority’s advice to consumers is that, while it does not breach FSA guidelines, a borrower should not be refused a loan if they choose not to buy an insurance policy.

 

Possible additional paragraphs – include any which apply to you

 

 

[i also told your salesperson that I had adequate insurance cover through a separate income protection policy.]

 

[i said I did not need the PPI as my employer provides a generous illness and redundancy package.]

 

[You are not allowed to make PPI a condition of taking out the loan unless you include the costs of PPI in the quoted interest rate, which you did not do.]

 

[in forcing me to buy this policy, you have also breached paragraph 8.6 of the Banking Code, to which you are a signatory.]

 

I do not believe being forced to buy this policy as part of the loan was a fair and reasonable obligation as I did not need this insurance and said at the time of taking the loan that I did not want it.

 

 

I am requesting a full refund of all my insurance payments, plus interest, which total [£ xxx].

 

If I do not receive a favourable response from you I will pursue this claim through the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[Your signature]

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Use letter one and change the unemployed/self employed bit to (I have a pre existing condition (details))also make reference to the letter they sent confirming this. then support this with the additional paragraph two (your salesperson should have checked etc)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Chris sorry for the delay to reply thanks for the templates they wwill come in usefull.I have left it till now as i booked an appointment to see my doctor about it.He told me he think they are pulling a fast one and is going to wright a letter to them as well as i have had a problem with my knee since the age of 21 when i did my ligaments ect.He also statede that he thinks they are playing funny buggers and will do his best to sort this out,and even though i have had my knee draind in the past it has never stoped me from work and this time it twisted and its the only time i have had of due to the cartlage and crusiat ligaments snaping totaly and how was anyone supposed to know that would happen.So i will wright a letter to them as well and see what happens thanks Ajk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...