Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

pc world- compaq computer dead-1 week after yr warranty ends


jubaxt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi-my son paid £599 for a compaq computer on 1st september 2006-low and behold it died on 10th september this year-hard drive corrupt-pc world not interested and neither are compaq.-we were away from august 27th so it may be argued that fault occured whilst in warranty-please advise-surely-a £600 computer should last longer than 53 weeks!??

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jubaxt.

 

You have my sympathy - you really do. But, in effect it's sod's law in action.

 

I am no expert on SOGA (sale of goods act) - but I'm sure you will get advice in this regard.

 

My instinct tells me this is a case for a goodwill settlement, i.e. replacement, repair, or contribution to repair, all of which need a softly-softly approach to a senior person by name, either at PC World or Compaq.

 

Whether it should come from you or your son depends on your individual circumstances.

 

The weekend columnists in the quality press frequently achieve amazing results, but at this stage I suggest the humble approach keeping the full broadside for later.

 

Not much help I feel, but do please keep us posted. Do remember this is a "Three Musketeer" site - one for all and all for one.

 

Regards.

 

Vandermerwe

Link to post
Share on other sites

No expert on SOGA but I believe it states that goods have to be sold as fit for purpose.

 

So the question becomes can you reasonably expect a computer to last longer than 53 weeks. I think we all know the answer to that one

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.

 

The one year warranty is in addition to your statutory rights, not instead of.

 

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) says that goods should be as follows:

  • Of satisfactory quality. This means the goods must meet the standards that any reasonable person would expect, taking into account the description, the price and all other relevant information. In some circumstances, the retailer may be liable for any statement made by the manufacturer about the goods.

Satisfactory quality includes the appearance and finish of the goods, their safety and durability and whether they are free from defects (including minor faults)

 

  • Fit for the purpose that goods of this type are generally sold. They must also be fit for any specific or particular purpose made known to the seller at the time of the agreement.
  • As described - goods should correspond with any description applied to them.

Have a read of my thread about the Toshiba Hard Drive, and you'll see that as long as you stick to your guns and show that you do know yoour rights, PCW usually caves in. You will have to be able to rattle off the relevant SOGA bits as if you did this every day, though, and be confident that it is not acceptable for them to say it isn't their problem.

 

Go to one of the advisors, but the moment he starts trying to tell you that it is nothing to do with them, there's nothing they can do, politely but firmly ask to speak to one of the managers and explain things fully to him. Don't say "I want this or that", say "You have responsabilities under SOGA, what are you prepared to do?", leaving it to him to offer you a solution.

 

When you say "hard-drive corrupt", what do you mean by that? How do you know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take note that corrupt data and a faulty hard drive are two different animals. I say this only because you have not made clear the issues that you are experiencing. A hard drive with corrupt data may not load up your PC, but is not faulty and can usually be resolved through the recovery method supplied with your PC.

 

If it is a faulty drive, in all honesty, PC World usually ask for an independent report to confirm the fault. If it is hard drive, the report should confirm this and the quote should be in the region of £60-£80. They will usually tell you to have it repaired and they'll send a cheque to reimburse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take note that corrupt data and a faulty hard drive are two different animals. I say this only because you have not made clear the issues that you are experiencing. A hard drive with corrupt data may not load up your PC, but is not faulty and can usually be resolved through the recovery method supplied with your PC.

 

If it is a faulty drive, in all honesty, PC World usually ask for an independent report to confirm the fault. If it is hard drive, the report should confirm this and the quote should be in the region of £60-£80. They will usually tell you to have it repaired and they'll send a cheque to reimburse.

This is pretty standard - and perfectly legal.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's why I asked for the clarification. :razz:

 

Sorry, just skimmed over the posts. Didn't mean to steal your thunder. (Especially since reading another thread it seems you are the producer of lightning and I assume the associated bang that goes with it :p)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your help folks-i can tell you where a liver or kidney is..............but when it comes to computers-well..

 

my son is in the forces and so i ran compaq on his behalf-they had me switch on the computer and press f10 continuously.they then asked me to click on specific instructions but it wouldnt do anything just said task failed.originally it wouldnt reboot-just came up wih some corrupt message-will speak with son tomorrow and update my thread-thanks

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

[personal comments removed.]

 

anything over 6 months from puchase requires the customer to prove fault. going to zit face steve is not proving it as he is not qualified to examine. get an independant report made out and contact techguys engineers on 0870 901 3000.

 

that number will give you options about in guarantee or out of guarantee. i would suggest you give the 'in guarantee' option a try. state that you have an independant report which proves its not software or maliciously caused.

 

then they should act including refundung the independant report costs. spikeachu if you know of a better number to call to get swifter action i suggest you reply to help out

Link to post
Share on other sites

[personal comments removed.]

 

anything over 6 months from puchase requires the customer to prove fault. going to zit face steve is not proving it as he is not qualified to examine. get an independant report made out and contact techguys engineers on 0870 901 3000.

 

that number will give you options about in guarantee or out of guarantee. i would suggest you give the 'in guarantee' option a try. state that you have an independant report which proves its not software or maliciously caused.

 

then they should act including refundung the independant report costs. spikeachu if you know of a better number to call to get swifter action i suggest you reply to help out

 

You are misunderstanding SOGA - as per.

 

An independent [NB spelling] report proving it is not SW or MD is not sufficient. The report also has to prove that the fault was there when purchased, as SOGA does not cover wear and tear.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

[personal comments removed.]

 

anything over 6 months from puchase requires the customer to prove fault. going to zit face steve is not proving it as he is not qualified to examine. get an independant report made out and contact techguys engineers on 0870 901 3000.

 

that number will give you options about in guarantee or out of guarantee. i would suggest you give the 'in guarantee' option a try. state that you have an independant report which proves its not software or maliciously caused.

 

then they should act including refundung the independant report costs. spikeachu if you know of a better number to call to get swifter action i suggest you reply to help out

 

Calling The Tech Guys isn't going to get you very far. They are primarily a warranty repair agent. If it's not in warranty, they can repair it at a charge of £120 plus components and labour. As a repair agent, they did not sell you the product, they are not bound by the Sale of Goods act and probably couldn't care less about any report you have.

 

If you want to discuss Sale of Goods act and remedies, discuss it directly with the retailer. My personal choice of numbers would be 0844 561 0000 and select options for complaints. Make sure that the complaint is logged and request a complaint reference number and an approximate turn aruond for a resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry spikeachu but techguys are DSGI employees right?, you know the company entity.

 

isnt a agent someone subcontracted. like a external company contracted in.

 

they are not a separate entity under contract of DSGI they actually are employee's of DSGI,

 

just trying to get my head more around the DSGI infrustructure.

 

 

ok so maybe calling the complaints department may get some action too. but would highly recommend getting a engineers report to co-oberate the fault. so if zit face steve not trained and techguys only deal with guarantee faults. who do pcworld use for SOGA issues. spikeachu. your an employee of DSGI so advice us all. tell us all who we should be calling if it is not techguys.

 

your an employee so you should have the answers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally address it to customer services or the branch itself.

 

The manager should know, or at least have a route to escalate it to ie branch support.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are misunderstanding SOGA - as per.

 

An independent [NB spelling] report proving it is not SW or MD is not sufficient. The report also has to prove that the fault was there when purchased, as SOGA does not cover wear and tear.

 

 

[edited].. you are not thinking.

 

by proving it was not caused by malicious damage rules out human factor such as destructive, agressive use and wear and tear.

 

if you have the qualifications and experience of diagnosing faults and have to write reports for a living then you will know when testing for malicious damage you automatically do checks which would come under the wear and tear tests. also checking lifespan of product such as checking seagate HD website for lifespan facts if HD is a seagate.

 

professionals who write reports dont just breathe on the product and say "yep its classed as hardware from production" they do test it fully. a independant report is unbiased and informative and shows true cause of issue.

 

it vital if retailers have to deal with SOGA issues as after some time (year manufacturers guarantee) it starts costing them mega bucks to repair products so they want it properly verified as fault before they start spending money on courior services engineers etc.

 

and if it goes to court then a independant report is very good evidence to use against retailer who refuses to act

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok many arguments here.

 

exactly what does everyone think a branch can do about a laptop.

 

spikeachu. answer this one.

 

laptops dont get repaired instore and zit face steve is not trained on SOGA or can calculate costs repair and weigh it against the financial benefit to replace it.

 

the manager from asking staff is just trained to sound convincing to agree with whatever is said and then pass the buck. more concerned with reducing instore refunds to maximise sales targets.

 

from what i have been reading and asking for laptops its this.

 

under 28days go to store

28days and over call techguys for repair.

 

laptops are not refunded instore unless repair fails or takes too long.

 

as for SOGA after asking the complaints department. they informed me that the techguys have a customer services department that take report and arrange shipping as they have engineers to repair and contacts to get parts.

 

pcworld customer services department is more about stock check, and if their are issues pass it onto the relevant party. customer service department dont repair laptops or diagnose faults. techguys do.

 

customers are getting fobbed off left right and centre. spikeachu your an employee give us some more detail in ur advice

 

spikeachu can u write a detailed guide as to the fastest solution for customers with faulty laptops, printers, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[edited].. you are not thinking.

 

by proving it was not caused by malicious damage rules out human factor such as destructive, agressive use and wear and tear.

 

if you have the qualifications and experience of diagnosing faults and have to write reports for a living then you will know when testing for malicious damage you automatically do checks which would come under the wear and tear tests. also checking lifespan of product such as checking seagate HD website for lifespan facts if HD is a seagate.

 

professionals who write reports dont just breathe on the product and say "yep its classed as hardware from production" they do test it fully. a independant report is unbiased and informative and shows true cause of issue.

 

it vital if retailers have to deal with SOGA issues as after some time (year manufacturers guarantee) it starts costing them mega bucks to repair products so they want it properly verified as fault before they start spending money on courior services engineers etc.

 

and if it goes to court then a independant report is very good evidence to use against retailer who refuses to act

Please do us all a favour and quit the ill conceived waffling.

 

You've clearly misunderstood the point I was trying to make.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

im only human maybe a more detailed explaination of your point is needed. legally you need a independant report and even retailers prefer an independant report.

 

do yourself a favour and realise over 6 months proof of fault is needed or customer has to accept they may have to pay retailers a inspection fee if no fault found. under guarantee retailers use manufacturer so no cost incurred to retailer. but after guarantee it costs retailer so they may charge customer if not proven faulty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fred, why oh why oh why do you have to post this drivel and ruin these forums? The poor OP is probably trying to work out what is going on and is having to scroll through pages of your drivel to find a decent answer.

 

Stop this pollution now. Go away. Bugger off. Vamoosh. Comprende?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...