Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

rss1979 v RBoS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, had a stab at this some time ago but had to postpone due to family problems, anyway...........

 

22/06/06: 1st letter sent (value £339)

23/06/06: Call from branch confirming reciept and advising that customer services would respond with 10 working days.

 

Fingers crossed..........I have Capital One in my sights now!

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all,

 

Recieved a letter from RBoS this morning. I am not sure if they are responding to my letter or initial phone call.

 

Prior to submitting my first letter I contacted my branch to request they refund some fees, customer services registered this as a "customer concern" and said that someone would respond within 48 hrs. I did receive a call advising me that half the charge would be refunded (£15) and a they would waive a £28 fee due to debit in July. I was not happy with this and explained that I expected a full refund of these recent fee's. I also advised the branch that I would be sending a letter requesting a full refund of the other fee's soon.

 

I will copy the full letter bellow, most of it seems standard but there is some detail in there unique to my situation.........

 

Dear Mr .......

 

Thank you for your telephone call of the 12th June 2006 and I apologise for any dissatisfaction caused by the application of charges to your account.

 

We believe that out charges are fair, reasonable and transparent. We consider the the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff, which we are satisfied, complies with all applicable laws and regulations. We are also commited to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation of our products.

 

We have considered and responded to the Office of Fair Trading's statement of 5 April 2006. We do not accept the Office of Fair Trading's findings in relation to credit card fees. We are concerned that the Office of Fair Trading has publicly called into question the setting of charges applied to other products, including current accounts. The Office of Fair Trading has restricted its investigation to credit cards and made no attempts to consult with RBS or the industry in relation to other, entirely different products.

 

Consquently, against that background, we must differ with the views expressed in your letter. Despite this, we have taken the opportunity to review the charges that have been applied to your account and as an exceptional matter we have agreed to refund £15 and waive the £28 due to debit on the 20th July 2006 as a gesture of goodwill. Acceptance by you of this payment will be in full and final settlement of all claims you may have relating to our charges. However, our terms and conditions will continue to apply and any charges that accrue in the future must stand.

 

Again, thank you for taking the time and trouble to call and I hope that your complaint is now resolved to your satisfaction.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Zoe Hardcastle

Service Quality Manager

 

My questions are.............

 

1) They have already refunded the £15 to my account and I expect they will not apply the £28 in July.....I did not accept this and certainly will not accept it as full and final settlement....However, as they have already credited the money to my account it appears that I have. What can I do about this?

 

2) Should I accept this as their response to my first letter?

 

3) Should I send the LBA now or wait for the 14 days to expire?

 

Thanks for reading all that.......I look forward to receiving your advice!!

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd just write back saying your not accepting as part of your LBA and just count the refund as a partial refund and reduce the claim by it.

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i sent 1st letter of requesting 6 years bank statements within 40 days that was up 26th june zoe rang there had been a mix she was not allowed to get them for me from this branch it had to go some where else so it may take a little while longer then another phone call wed 28th the request had got lost in internal mail so have to start again i know they are messing me about hoping i get fed up (which i wont)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already reduced the amount I requested in my first letter by £15.

 

My worry is that this will get to court and RBoS will defend by stating that the matter was already resolved.

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

not if you've wrote back saying that you don't accept and you will be carrying on for the full amount.

  • Confused 1

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

I have decided to treat the letter above as the banks response, even though it is dated 2 days prior to my initial request. It's interesting to note that the banks response refers to my initial contact as both a phone call and letter. I did contact the branch by telephone on the 12th of June to request that they refund some recent charges. As this was to no avail I followed up with a letter requesting a full refund (22 June 2006).

 

My draught response is listed below, comments please.....

 

Account Number: 1.........

Sort Code: 1.-..-..

 

Letter Before Action

 

Thank you for your letter of response dated 20 June 2006 and received 30 June 2006. I am disappointed that we are unable to reach agreement over this matter.

I note that your letter is dated 20 June 2006, two days prior to my letter requesting you refund charges levied against my account. It is not clear whether you are responding to our telephone conversation or my letter to RD, 22 June 2006 as you refer to both in your response. I accept your letter as notification of the banks position regarding this matter.

 

I understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £339.00. I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original letter of the 22 June 2006.

 

I am aware that you have already refunded £15.00 to my account 20 June 2006. I do not accept this refund as full and final settlement as it was credited to my account without my knowledge or agreement.

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the Office of Fair Trading upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the Office of Fair Trading's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

RSS1979

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone offer advice regarding the above post please??

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah sounds fine to me!

NatWest - Settled in full 22/05/06

 

RBS- Prelim sent 9/05/06 £1,147

£500 offer 27/05/06, rejected 30/05/06

LBA sent 25/05/06 :razz:

MCOL 15/06/06

Defence received 20/07/06

Settled in full 01/09/06 wahey!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

22/06/06: 1st letter sent (value £339)

23/06/06: Call from branch confirming reciept and advising that customer services would respond with 10 working days.

30/06/06: Standard response recieved

03/07/06: LBA Sent

 

........................onwards and upwards..................

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

my second (first) repsponse..

 

Dear Mr. XXXX

 

Your complaint regarding charges has been passed to me and I am sorry we have failed to reach an agreement with you. Please accept my appologies for any unintended inconvieniance or upset.

 

I regrety that there is little that I can add constructively to previous comments but having reviewed your account, I can find no instance where charges have been applied when they were not properly due. The have all been associated with the lack of covering funds in the account at the time the items were presented for payment. Accordingley, the charges that have been applied to your account should stand.

 

That said, in the hope of forgoing a compromise and settlement with you, Zoe Hardcastle from our Wakefield branch proposed an offer of £44 as a gesture of goodwill and without admission of error or liability. This would be paid on the basis of a full and final settlement.

 

I know you have declined this offer but it is not to be increased. If, on relection, you decide to accept please contact Zoe who will be able to arrange payment.

 

I suspect that this is unlikely to be the answer you might have hoped to receive but nonetheless thank you for taking the time and trouble to contact us.

 

Your Sincerely

 

Tommy McLean

Manager, Customer Relations Unit

 

I am going to send another LBA as this is clearly the response to my letter. The previous letter must have been a response to my telephone call.

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to send another LBA as this is clearly the response to my letter. The previous letter must have been a response to my telephone call.

 

Don't send another LBA. Stick to the guidelines here, and the timetable you have set. If no response when the 14 days are up start Court action.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely though, I shouldn't react to a letter that was sent before my initial approach?

 

There was a lot of confusion at the start of this process, I made an initial telephone call requesting some charges be refunded. When I hit a brick wall I made a request for all the charges using the libraby template. The response from my initial request came after I sent the letter and as it refered to a letter I assumed it was their response,............

 

Very confusing I know, if you read up it should make sense.

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read through the step-by-step process in the FAQs.

 

Prelim - LBA - Court.

 

You can keep sending duplicate LBAs for months - the only difference it will make is that you will run out of stamps. You told them in your letter that if they didn't respond within 14 days you would start legal proceedings - why did you say this if you aren't going to do it?

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok...........I think I need to explain...

 

May and June some charges were debited from my account

 

12th June - Called Bank to request those charges be refunded

 

22nd June - After no response to my initial call I sent preliminary letter to branch.

 

30th June - Recieved a letter from Branch dated 20th (before my prelim letter) refering to both a letter and a phone call and advising that only a partial refund could be offered (see above).

 

1st July - Sent LBA

 

8th July - Recieved standard letter from Tommy McLean in resonse to my preliminary letter.

 

So now I plan to send an LBA to branch, this is sticking to my original timetable and in line with the threats made in my letters.

 

Don't you agree?

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now I plan to send an LBA to branch, this is sticking to my original timetable and in line with the threats made in my letters.

 

Don't you agree?

 

No!

 

Did you not read the previous answers?

 

Regardless of phone calls, responses from the bank etc etc the situation is this:

 

1) You sent the bank a letter saying 'give me my money back within 14 days' - they didn't do this.

 

2) You sent them a letter saying 'last chance - give me my money back within 14 days or I'll takr you to court' - they haven't done this.

 

So the next stage would be to do what you have said you'll do - take them to court.

 

The letters you have received from the bank are completely irrelevant unless they've offered you a full refund, which they haven't.

 

Stick to the step-by-step guide and do what you said you'd do. If you had no intention of taking them to court when the 14 days were up then you shouldn't have put this in your letter.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read through the step-by-step process in the FAQs.

 

Prelim - LBA - Court.

 

DONE!!!

 

You can keep sending duplicate LBAs for months

 

Not months, one week and only two.......the first of which was not sent after 14 days, but earlier as I made a mistake and responded to the wrong letter.

 

You told them in your letter that if they didn't respond within 14 days you would start legal proceedings - why did you say this if you aren't going to do it?

 

My ultimate intention is to proceed to court should they not pay up within the next 14 days.

 

I am not really sure why you have an attitude and comments like.........

 

If you had no intention of taking them to court when the 14 days were up then you shouldn't have put this in your letter.

 

really don't help anyone.......

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, I take this situation very seriously and understand that the way I conduct this claim could affect the next person that tries the same.

 

I am not playing games here.........a little mutual respect would be nice!

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not really sure why you have an attitude and comments like.........

 

If you say you'll take them to court in 14 days and then don't but send them another LBA they'll think you don't know what you're doing and that you aren't willing to take them to court - this will only make it more difficult for yourself.

 

You've asked the question, been given advice and are still asking the same question, how else would you like it to be said. It is not an 'attitude', merely trying to make it as clear (albeit blunt) as possible.

 

To clarify, 14 days from the date of your LBA - if full settlement is not received take them to court - that is what you said you'd do in your letter, so do it.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

HELP!!!

 

I am trying to complete the claim for on moneyclaim.gov.uk and have got to the "particulars of claim". There is a 1080 character limit and I can't really condense my wording down any further.........can I?

 

1. The Claimant has an account (number ******) with the Defendant which was opened in April 2002.

 

2. During the period in which the account has been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

3. The Claimant contends that:

 

a) The charges debited to the account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant, exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or relate to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

 

4. Accordingly the Claimant claims

 

a) The return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £339.00 and any interest charged thereon;

 

b) Court costs;

 

c) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from various dates to 24th August 2006 of £ £45.54 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of 7.458 pence per day.

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true

 

All help much appreciated!!

"If you owe the bank 100 pounds, you're the one with the problem. But if you owe a million pounds, the bank's the one with the problem."

 

Lord John Maynard First Baron Keynes of Tilton.

 

"If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem; if you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem".

 

John Paul Getty

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...