Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) Name of the Claimant :           PARKINGEYE LTD Claimants Solicitors: (if one is stated)   Date of issue – 22 April 2024   Date for AOS - 11 May 2024 Date to submit Defence - 24 May 2024 What is the claim for –  Claim for monies outstanding from the Defendant in relation to a Parking charge (reference *************) issued on 22/01/2024.  The signage clearly displayed throughout Welcome Break Leicester Forest East (North), Northbound, M1, Jct 21/21a, Leicester Forest, Leicester, LE3 3GB states that this is private land, managed by ParkingEye Ltd, and that it is subject to terms and conditions, including the payment of parking tariffs, by which those who park agree to be bound (the contract).  ParkingEye's ANPR system captured vehicle ******* entering and leaving the site on 16/01/2024, and parking without paying to park and parking tariffs apply after a free stay period.  Pursuant to Sch 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, notice has been given to the registered keeper, making them liable for the Parking Charge payable upon breach. What is the value of the claim? 100.00 ? Amount Claimed 125.00 court fees 35.00 legal rep fees 50.00  Total Amount 210.00 Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? No Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? Y dated 10 March 2024, no reply
    • Obviously I'm ignorant and don't know the local area - but to me the images show the front of the car entering, and the rear of the car exiting, both times. On a second point - do you have any proof of your being elsewhere during the two times they reckon you were three hours in the car park? BTW, I've just done a search and we have 81 G24 threads apart from yours.  This is a company that huffs & puffs but very rarely does court.  In fact of the 81 cases, in 79 they haven't done court In one court case sadly the Cagger didn't defend and lost by default. In the second case G24 issued a court claim ...and then wet themselves and discontinued the case once the Cagger defended.
    • Often vehicle insurers will refuse to deal with third party property damage claims. They will by lack of willing rely on the third party to use their company Insurance  and the companies Insurance would try to reclaim through your Car Insurance. Agree with Ethel, but sometimes Insurance claims staff will try to avoid additional work.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Continuing Care


Cymraeg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't want to hijack Rob S' or Recompense41's threads , so I'll start another,

along the lines of the other members.We have today been told that our relative cannot be discharged home and must now go into a nursing home/residential care. All a bit sketchy at the moment,but reading the other posts,it looks like we're in for a bit of a fight.

I want to start getting things right from the off,so any advice as to what I should be doing now will be gratefully received.

Not sure as to whether living in Wales has it's own guidelines/rules. (Our part of the NHS is in a right mess as it is.)

TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, have the hospital stated that they will be carrying out a continuing care assessment? If not, ask them if they intend to do so, it is something they have to do. If they try and say it is not required insist on it.

 

Secondly, a new national framework for assessing eligibility for continuing care comes in to effect on the 1st October and it replaces all the others that have been used by Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities up to now. It means there is one criteria instead of the 28 that were previously in existence, but it is new and untested and I have no doubt the PCT's will have their own spin on it.

 

Yes, it will be a hard battle but there are plenty out there who are fighting it and will give you support. I don't know if you have found this site yet but there is lots of info on it which will assist you:-

 

NHS funded Continuing Care and the Coughlan case

 

Don't let them fob you off with lies, challenge everything and accept nothing until you have been able to verify the information they give you. They will do their damndest to convince you it is a social care issue and not health care, but stick to your guns.

 

 

PS What type of home have they said your relative will have to go into?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find out what type of care you need to look at first, is it nursing care the relative needs or is it residential? (your social worker will tell you), if you havent got a social wrker I would strongly advise you get one, a lot of homes now will not take any resident usually without the intervention of one. when you know what category of care you are looking for, your sw should give you a list of local homes of which you can view, although again, I would advise you ring them first (the homes on the list) to see if a) they do the category of care and b) any vacancies. Any homes you do visit, try to avoid mealtimes as the staff will be concentrating on the residents and wont be able to give you their full attention and explain things to you. If it is nursing care, then Rob S has made a valid point about continuing care - ask for an assessment. Find out the fees of what the home charges - cheapest is not always best.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as we're aware,no formal assessment has been carried out yet. For about a week they (the ward team) have been saying that she's not fit to live at home (alone). She has had carers calling on her up until her fall , but now she needs residential care of a sort. We are under the impression that we have to look at EMI homes in the area. At a previous meeting, the SS area controller had attended but I would have thought that a 'lower' position than herself would be appointed as 'care manager' , or another social worker would be appointed to our relative's case.

 

I've looked thru a few sites and taking it all in is a bit bemusing all at once. I've asked another relative who's another step back from this to look at some info for me,in case I'm getting confused. Up until now we've signed nothing and have gone along with the ward.

 

"Secondly, a new national framework for assessing eligibility for continuing care comes in to effect on the 1st October and it replaces all the others that have been used by Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities up to now. It means there is one criteria instead of the 28 that were previously in existence, but it is new and untested and I have no doubt the PCT's will have their own spin on it."

Is this nationwide , or only in England?

Sorry if I'm appearing thick :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that link Rob S

I've got a feeling now that they'll wait until Monday until they start anything so that everything will then apply to the new guidelines. Easier for all than changing the rules halfway thru'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Cymraeg

 

I just wanted to wish you all the best in your fight with the NHS/social services. I've found the information on this forum and others to be invaluable in arming me with the right information and advice. Do keep us posted as to how it goes.

 

Dee

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...