Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statutory Demands


karonus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have now read a number of the messages on the forum, and seen that most of the recommended action revolves around county court actions. Firstly, if the amount claimed is more than £750.00 has anyone considered the idea of issuing a statutory demand, the image of winding up proceedings against a bank is rather amusing. Also, if the debt is more than £1,500.00 and it goes all the way to Judgement why bother with Bailiffs. Have more fun and have the debt transferred to the Sherrifs office, could be more interesting than the bailiffs going in.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 20+ years in debt recovery, surprisingly I had never come across the acts and the impact on bank charges until Steve's well publicised case against Abbey.

 

In my working life carrying out corporate debt recovery one of the tools used against companies owing more than £750.00 is the statutory demand. For more infor check out

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/guidanceleaflets/guides.htm#3

 

But basically you issue a statutory demand that does not cost anything to issue (the form is available on the net or from your local cort). The creditor has to respond within 21 days with either a settlement , payment or counter claim. This document must be served on the registered office along with a proof of service (listed in yellow pages). If they dont respond you can apply to have the company wound up. If there are any legal eagles please feel free to expand.

 

Likewise if it goes to the point of getting judgements and the debt is more than £1500 have it bounced up to the sheriffs office. They are on commission and not salaried like bailiffs and will stop at nothing to recover any monies due.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instructing High Court Enforcement Officers is expensive. Also, transferring the case to the High Court costs money.

You have a duty to litigate reasonably.

I would say that with a judgment creditor such as the bank -which is likely to pay up a bailliff should be all that it reasonably necessary.

If that proved not to work, then certainly the HCEO would be a fun thing to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

icon1.gif Re: Stautory Demands - An Update And More Help Please!

my wife has had a stat demand from legal and receivables,we have now got 21 days and we have not replied or had it st aside,we have contacted them and asked if we can enter a arrangement and legal and receivable have said they want the 4500 pounds paid in 3 or 4 instalments,we cannot afford this and have offered £60 a month,they have declined this.

We have a mortgage for £107000 and a secured loan for £20000 and a charge order for £6000 and the value of the house is £125000 so there is a shortfall.

What i am wondering is can they still sell the house and make us bankrupt even though there is no equity.

and also the house is in a joint mortgage so how would that affect things.

Also the account doesnt show on our credit file,the last time it was on file it showed as satisfied.(Maybe debt was sold on to other creditor)

I have tied contacting red castle (gothia) the creditor but we are not getting anywhere.

Any Advice please

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

If the money is owed and youve admitted it then I think you need to go to either a solicitor or insolvency expert via the Citizens Advice Bureau. I am no expert but I think you may be able to enter a voluntary arrangement or type of administration where most of the debt is written off in return for paying something off. But a professional expert has more clout in negotiations and I think you need advice and dont leave it until they petition for bankruptcy. The stat demand could be a bluff as it costs nothing to issue but dont avoid it as it may not go away- get some proper advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, in the scheme of things £4,500 is not much although it seems like a lot to you. They think its small beer so cant understand you not paying it in 3 goes. But once your circumstances are explained its not really worth the legal hassle just for £4.500 where there is no equity and guarantee of anything in forcing bankruptcy. I might be wrong but I think youll get it sorted with the help of CAB

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 20+ years in debt recovery, surprisingly I had never come across the acts and the impact on bank charges until Steve's well publicised case against Abbey.

 

In my working life carrying out corporate debt recovery one of the tools used against companies owing more than £750.00 is the statutory demand. For more infor check out

Publications and Guidance Material Issued by The Insolvency Service

 

But basically you issue a statutory demand that does not cost anything to issue (the form is available on the net or from your local cort). The creditor has to respond within 21 days with either a settlement , payment or counter claim. This document must be served on the registered office along with a proof of service (listed in yellow pages). If they dont respond you can apply to have the company wound up. If there are any legal eagles please feel free to expand.

 

Likewise if it goes to the point of getting judgements and the debt is more than £1500 have it bounced up to the sheriffs office. They are on commission and not salaried like bailiffs and will stop at nothing to recover any monies due.

 

Steve

 

A Statutory Demand can often be bluff.

 

If you were to issue one then you have to have the intention of following through with it-otherwise it is pretty toothless and the recipient may just call that bluff.

 

Also, to actually follow it up can cost you a significant amount of money and you have to be sure the amount owed is unlikely to be disputed-otherwise money down the drain.

 

Further, why bankrupt somebody who owes you money?:confused: You will hardly likely get it back and certainly not what it cost to bankrupt them-which could be more than what was owed to you in any case.

 

However, if it was HMRC who issued it then I would worry. They don't bluff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you say, the problem is if you have assets. But Mrshn has no equity. Mrshn was worried about the house which I dont think is a worry. Using one of the forum links to a govt insolvency site I read the situation. Anything under 5,000 can be dealt with by a voluntary arrangent brokered by CAB where the creditor settles for a proportion. However, if the creditor petitions for bankruptcy it would cost a couple of grand with no guarantee of getting any money. The registrar can if the debtor has few assets issue an administration order where the debtor pays only a proportion, the home is kept and the bankruptcy is waived. I know someone who had 50k credit card debt reduced to 5k via administration. Mrshn may have other debts but the 4.5k mentioned is piddling money to banks. They should not worry-just get some help and advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the website which tells you everything Publications and Guidance Material Issued by The Insolvency Service

 

By the looks of it for people with no equity they can run up as much credit as they like and then get the slate wiped clean if they cant pay. All it takes is a little balls. This is quite comical really because banks charge high interest and penalties but they have no way of enforcing it on people with no equity. The banks lend to anyone without equity and the legal system washes its hands of the bank made mess. Thats why theres a credit crunch

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi , i have got a long dispute with a building company i worked for.

in the begining they were being late at sending cheques , that as they were saying my invoices dont have numbers and a bit hard to solve them.. I did them with numbers but still late pay and some invoices date back december 2008

I sent them a letter before action 10 days ago and that prduced a cheque but still owed 19.000

Intending to send a statutory of demand but can that be done by me without help of a solicitor? and i need to go to their offices and not sending by post?

 

I have recruited a debt recovery company for another small debt but they charge 20percent plus vat on every thing recieved ..

Many thanks for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...