Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Had a previous car loan with this lot. Included in the amount (prior to added interest) on this agreement, is the outstanding balance from the previous loan. This outstanding balance had already been subject to hefty interest on the 1st loan, yet on this agreement they added interest to it again! Also, where it states that the particular Ts and Cs (ref # removed) form part of the agreement, the Ts and Cs they've sent, which they say are part of the agreement, but they are not- they have a different reference number to the Ts and Cs which form part of the (original) agreement. agreeandterm.pdf
    • I would only rely on your solicitor in this regard. The other two should not have a view.   And, you are responsible for how the court perceive you. They only have your words and deeds to go on. Expecting them to magically see things your way is not a great tactic.
    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

They have made me an offer...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6262 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I filled a claim against RBS for £470 + 8% statutory interest (£120) and the £80 claim fee. Total £670.

 

They have sent me a letter saying that I am in the wrong, but they have made an offer of £470...

 

Basically I don't want to accept... but If I reject the offer what is my chance of success?

 

Any comments

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't go after the stat 8%, that would not go down well with the Court.

 

You should write back to them , however, pointing out that since they took so long to sort it out, that the timetable you outlined at the outset had been adhered to, and court action commenced, therefore they should be paying your court costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone has had an offer of a full refund and gone to court anyway, no. I wouldn't if I was you.

 

If you wanted to make sure you got interest, you should have gone for CI added at prelim.

 

Sorry if that's not what you want to hear, but you have won, enjoy it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've had a full settlement offer. What can you take them to court on the grounds of? You would be threatening getting your claim thrown out of court if you did this.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi wasted bullet i may be wrong here but the way i am reading this is that you have done your claim MCOL and then you have had an offer, to clarify this for you.

 

1/. If you havent started a court claim against them and they offered the full settlement you need to accept this as it would prejudice your claim not to.

 

2/. If you have started legal proceedings then they made you the offer, refuse it, you are entitled to the judical interest of 8% plus your costs of MCOL.

 

Clairify where you are at, claimed filed or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi wasted bullet i may be wrong here but the way i am reading this is that you have done your claim MCOL and then you have had an offer, to clarify this for you.

Aaaaah. Yes I see where you're coming from, jumped the gun a bit I did.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have filed, then the answer would be to reject. They aren't going to allow this to get to court. They will return with a full settlement.

 

There is a rejection letter in the template forum.

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Similar story here. I had already filed a claim by the time they responded to my original letter, 7 weeks later, offering to settle without liability the full amount.

 

I rejected their offer asking them to include the £39 cost in raising the action + interest on the amount.

 

Anyway, since then they have apparently stated they will appear on the date of the hearing which is on Monday (letter to that effect waiting at home). No hint given as to whether they are disputing the action or not.

 

So, no going back now. Will, as they say, keep you all posted...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've also been offered a part settlement from RBS. My LBA was sent to them at the beginning of the month and they first send a holding letter and then followed it up with an offer within the 14 day timescale. Thing is my claim is quite substantial (£7k plus) and they have offered me a settlement at about 75%. I know that by rights I can take it further but due to the amount of money involved I'm very tempted to accept to save me the hassle of fighting them any further. Anyone got any thoughts? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've also been offered a part settlement from RBS. My LBA was sent to them at the beginning of the month and they first send a holding letter and then followed it up with an offer within the 14 day timescale. Thing is my claim is quite substantial (£7k plus) and they have offered me a settlement at about 75%. I know that by rights I can take it further but due to the amount of money involved I'm very tempted to accept to save me the hassle of fighting them any further. Anyone got any thoughts? Thanks

 

Depends whether it's in a Scottish Court or an English Court... in your case, the amount exceeds the small claims court limit in either case, so i would consider seriously whether you want to pursue them for the full amount... main reason being that were you to lose, then costs could be awarded against you - not something whihc can happen (as far as I understand) in the small claims court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wrote an initial letter to rbs claiming 1521.00 + interest (390.00), they wrote back offering the 1521.00 but no interest, not sure what to do, does anyone have any ideas, do i accept the 1521.00 and leave the interest, or do i issue another letter asking for the interest ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends whether it's in a Scottish Court or an English Court... in your case, the amount exceeds the small claims court limit in either case, so i would consider seriously whether you want to pursue them for the full amount... main reason being that were you to lose, then costs could be awarded against you - not something whihc can happen (as far as I understand) in the small claims court.

But what are the chances of losing? If 25% of the claim means another £2,500 then surely the honus is on Scott to do his revision, ensure his court claim is watertight and file?

 

JMO

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had already filed my claim with MCOL.

 

I phoned RBS the next day and rejected the offer, I was told that the offer thay had made was the 'Only offer that they would make....etc...'. I said that because I had allready filed my claim online when they made the offer I wasn't going to accept it and I would request a Judgement as soon as the 28 day period exspired.

 

Then 36 hours later I had a second letter with settlement for the full amount. £626.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...