Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Creation default nightmare***Resolved***


zo-po
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2270 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can someone shed some light on this for me.

 

Long story short,

 

I have a credit account that was opened in 2010, it defaulted in 2011,

CCJ in 2012 and interim charge order in 2012,

 

This account has only been reported on my credit file from 2014.

no info is showing for 2012 or 2013 therefore no default shows up and the account is reported as 6mth late payment.

Is this correct?

 

if I pay the debt in full does the whole debt fall off my file as it was over 6years old in 2017 or stay for another 6 years after payment.

 

The company say that the default was issued in 2011 and that they will continue to update my file with 6mth late payment until I pay the debt In full even if that’s for another 20 years.

 

Surely this is unethical, are they able to do this?

 

Thanks in advance

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

The default should have been placed in 2011 and run from that date until its 6th Anniversary (2017) at which time it was fall of your CRAs.

The CCJ would have been registered from 2012 and again will run as above until 2018.

 

If you have documentary evidence submit a report to the CRAs and ask for a note of correction to be placed on file and also write to Creation to inform them to make a correction.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy

Creation have said that the default were added to the accounts (I have two) 24/11/2011 and 9/01/2012.

 

Over the phone they said if I pay the remaining balance in full they will update the file.

If I don’t pay they won’t.

 

Sounds Like black mail to me, as like you say they should already have dropped off due to the date.

 

I know I still have to pay the debt but I need to sell my property and pay with the equity.

 

However, I need to Secure a mortgage first and I can’t because of how they’ve reported this.

 

if I can get it removed as it should be there is no problem and the debt can be paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

paying it wont remove it

the card entry should'nt be there if they issued a default notice in 2011

 

but as andy says

the CCJ will still show till its 6th birthday

 

and wont be removed even if you get the default sorted.....

 

that alone will kill the mortgage

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a lender that will accept the ccj.

 

The problem is creation won’t enter the correct default date with Equifax If they do it will drop off.

 

Can I force them to apply the correct default date if so how?

 

As it stands the ccj with drop off before the defaulted account because they haven’t applied the default. which can’t be right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

strange they'll accepts a CCJ not a default..

 

have you written proof from creation that they did serve a default notice in 2011?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s not the default that’s the problem it the fact the because the default is not on the account as it should be with Equifax,

 

creation are reporting it as 6 months late payments on an account that should not be showing as it over 6 years old.

 

It a backhanded way of ruining your credit file for longer than the six years.

 

if I don’t pay or get the defaulted corrected it would continue for ever as 6 months late payments.

 

No written proof just what they have told me over the phone.

 

Defaults dates are 24/11/11 and 9/1/2012

 

Here’s Screen shot of how it being reported

04C45225-6746-4C99-B995-498C2C86D35E.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they issued a default notice

then they should have entered a defaulted date in the debt summary not just the 6 in the calendar section.

 

once you have written proof from their comms or account log

or they send a copy of the default notice to you, you have no written proof to complain to the Information Commissioners office with.

once you have that proof they will rule in your favour and the default will be registered correctly and thus the account will vanish from your file.

 

so get an sar running to creation and get everything they hold on you.

 

I still find it mighty strange a lender will accept a CCJ, which normally kills a mortgage dead

but will not accept the debt that caused the CCJ .....weird

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many many lenders that we accept defaults, arrears (non in the last 3 months.) Ccj sat or unsat. Non in the last 24 months. DMP if in place for over 12mths and can still remain. Rates are around 3.5% ( still cheaper then rent) and increase with the amount of adverse credit you have. Remortgage in 2years and get a better rate as adverse is older.

 

Thanks for your advice. I appreciate it and will start to get that written proof.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the original debt

and who is registered and the claimant on the CCJ and the CO?

is this a debt in your sole name or joint and it the property sole or joint its registered against?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good lad!!

 

furniture loan?

 

I bet 90% of it was penalty charges and PPI/insurances you should have defended it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update after lots and lots of phone calls to creation they have agreed to apply the default at the date issued which was 2011 and early 2012. So these accounts with be removed from my credit file at the most 28 days time.

 

So now I can move on to get my mortgage.

Thank you all for taking time to answer my questions and giving advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good work

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent and well done Creation Finance ...thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...