Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with builder


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I hired a builder to do some work in my flat. The final invoice he sent me was, by my calculations, way too high, so I sent him an email asking him for more details and could he please tie it back to the original quote, which he claimed is not possible. There were lots of emails exchanged, he sent me some revised figures, and the last invoice he sent me was closer to what I calculated I owe him. So I questioned him about that one final time (I mean, all he has to do was tie it back to the quote, I don't know why he can't do that), and he is now saying "Fine, pay what you think you owe me, and I'm going to issue you with another invoice for works that I didn't charge for."

Does he have the right to do that? If he has, is there some protection in the law that would stop him demanding, say, £1000 to put one shelf up? Can he charge me for the time spend in email exchanges regarding clarification about hist first invoice?

Is there a legal process that he has to follow to get me to pay?

Can I contest the invoice? Is there a legal process that I need to follow to contest it (I haven't received it yet).

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume that you obtained a quote and then added other jobs without agreeing a price.

Please confirm if this is correct.

Then, please list these extra jobs and how much he wants to charge, just to have an idea about how unreasonable the prices are.

Some jobs seem easy enough but carry a big price because of the equipment needed.

For example, drilling a 4 inch hole in a wall is easy enough and takes a few minutes, but the diamond core and clutched drill needed to do that are very expensive and builders need to get their money back overtime, so it's not unusual to charge up to £100 to fit a vent even though it only takes 15 minutes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's not what happened. It's a bit more complicated than that. It literally is what I said. I could not make sense of his figures, I asked him for clarification, he was not willing or able to tie back his invoice to the quote (surely that's not an unreasonable thing to ask for????), there were lots of emails exchanges, he said I was being picky about the wording when I tried to quote some things he said, and he was trying - as a see it - to charge me for things that I shouldn't be charged for.

 

What I mean by that is this: I first got a quote that included a quoted amount to replace the kitchen floor with laminate or lino. I also asked him for a (separate) quote for putting down reclaimed wood flooring. This was sent to me with the words "I have added the cost of reclaimed flooring installation at the end", came in a document called something like "…including reclaimed floor installation", and clearly said ("kitchen: installation of reclaimed flooring"). So I thought that it was a quote for, you know, putting down reclaimed wood flooring.

 

Now in the end, I chose lino, and that's what got installed. So I thought that the quote for reclaimed wood would not be counted as part of the final cost, but he says that actually, he is counting it, because - he told me as part of the email exchange to clarify his figures - it's for lino flooring installation. This was quoted as (L) for the kitchen + (M) for the hallway and (N) for the bathroom, and L was a higher amount than the original amount quoted for lino. Since I thought this referred to reclaimed wood flooring, that made absolute sense to me. But apparently, no, it was for lino, and the higher cost for the kitchen is because it's a larger area, since it involves the hallway and the bathroom…which I would absolutely agree with if hallway and bathroom didn't carry their own cost. So, unless there's something blindingly obvious that I'm not seeing (which IS possible), that didn't make sense to me.

 

I can send you the long version if you'd like, it's not worth putting on line.

 

Anyway, we did agree in an amount, I've paid it, still have not received the additional invoice for works not charged for, and no idea what these will be.

 

I'm going to try and get legal advice tomorrow, just in case.

 

Anyway, thanks for replying. If/ when he does send the additional invoice, I'll update.

Edited by PamSa
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...