Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Please help.........Tesco/Incasso


GirlAloud
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5090 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In may 2007, jointly with my ex husband took out a tesco (RBS) personal loan for 25k. My husband left me in Oct 2008 and I maintained payments until Dec 08. I have paid nothing since. This was not a decision I took lightly, but did not have sufficient funds so concentrated on my priority debts.

 

- my last correspondence with tesco was July 09. I sent them my budget and made it clear I could not arroded payments

- Incasso obtained a CCJ against my ex in Sept 09 - I am not sure what the current status of that is

- I do not have enough disposable income for an IVA and for obvious reasons do not want bankruptcy. This is one of 3 unsecured creditors (about 60% of the overall total)

- I have today received a demand for Incasso for the full amount (standard letter, limited info, 14 days to pay)

 

I intend to file a complaint with tesco for failure to follow OFT guidelines (they have never told me the case has been passed to Incasso) and I believe Incasso are demanding an unreasonably large amount. I will follow up with complaints to the Law Society (Incasso) and FOS (Tesco) if appropriate. However this will only delay them. In a seperate letter Incasso has asked for a copy of a transfer of equity form which my husband signed in respect of my property (I will not be providing this!!). My questions are:

 

- is it reasonable to include in any defence to a county court claim, that I have gone a significant life changing event (seperation) which could not have been anticipated when I took the loan out. As a result of this I was forced to prioritise my debts and as a result unsecured debts went unpaid

- is a reasonable defence to a charging order the fact my house is in negative equity? It is worth circa 165k but currently has loans (main mortage and second charge) of around 205k? Therefore there is no reasonable hope of Tesco ever getting anything. I have maintained payments on both these loans although both are currently in managed arrears.

 

For info, I am in full time employment, have have a enough money for priority debts and living expenses. Tesco have previously suppiled what appears to be a valid, signed copy of a CCA.

 

PLEASE HELP!! I want to be prepared. I know Incasso are rottweillers and will follow up leagal threats!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing.

 

In the meantime i'm really hoping someone very knowledgeable will come along!!!!

 

Your husbands CCJ was for what? The full amount?

 

- is it reasonable to include in any defence to a county court claim, that I have gone a significant life changing event (seperation) which could not have been anticipated when I took the loan out. As a result of this I was forced to prioritise my debts and as a result unsecured debts went unpaid Could really do with a comment on this from someone that knows!!

- is a reasonable defence to a charging order the fact my house is in negative equity? It is worth circa 165k but currently has loans (main mortage and second charge) of around 205k? Therefore there is no reasonable hope of Tesco ever getting anything. I have maintained payments on both these loans although both are currently in managed arrears.I believe that this is used as a defence, albeit not the strongest of defences. need more views here!!!![/QUOTE]

 

Hopefully i've bumped you. Your problems are complicated though I reckon there's a solution.

 

hang in there.

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll see if I can get you some more knowledgeable help.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In may 2007, jointly with my ex husband took out a tesco (RBS) personal loan for 25k. My husband left me in Oct 2008 and I maintained payments until Dec 08. I have paid nothing since. This was not a decision I took lightly, but did not have sufficient funds so concentrated on my priority debts.

 

- my last correspondence with tesco was July 09. I sent them my budget and made it clear I could not arroded payments

- Incasso obtained a CCJ against my ex in Sept 09 - I am not sure what the current status of that is

- I do not have enough disposable income for an IVA and for obvious reasons do not want bankruptcy. This is one of 3 unsecured creditors (about 60% of the overall total)

- I have today received a demand for Incasso for the full amount (standard letter, limited info, 14 days to pay)

 

I intend to file a complaint with tesco for failure to follow OFT guidelines (they have never told me the case has been passed to Incasso) and I believe Incasso are demanding an unreasonably large amount. I will follow up with complaints to the Law Society (Incasso) and FOS (Tesco) if appropriate. However this will only delay them. In a seperate letter Incasso has asked for a copy of a transfer of equity form which my husband signed in respect of my property (I will not be providing this!!). My questions are:

 

- is it reasonable to include in any defence to a county court claim, that I have gone a significant life changing event (seperation) which could not have been anticipated when I took the loan out. As a result of this I was forced to prioritise my debts and as a result unsecured debts went unpaid

- is a reasonable defence to a charging order the fact my house is in negative equity? It is worth circa 165k but currently has loans (main mortage and second charge) of around 205k? Therefore there is no reasonable hope of Tesco ever getting anything. I have maintained payments on both these loans although both are currently in managed arrears.

 

For info, I am in full time employment, have have a enough money for priority debts and living expenses. Tesco have previously suppiled what appears to be a valid, signed copy of a CCA.

 

PLEASE HELP!! I want to be prepared. I know Incasso are rottweillers and will follow up leagal threats!

 

There are issues here I am unable to help with but....

 

My question is did you have payment protection insurance (PPI) on this loan??

 

If you did there is a strong possibility that the PPI may have been mis-sold due to you circumstances at the time. If PPI was attached and you have a claim for mis-selling this may be of help to you.

 

Please have a look in this forum.

 

Payment Protection Insurance (PPI)

 

I am sure the site team will look at all the eventuallities and offer support and guidance as they can.

 

Please post up for more help and if you consider PPI to be an issue please start a thread in the PPI forum ;)

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No PPI attached to this loan. I have sending a letter off to Tesco tomorrow about failure to follow OFT guidelines though I know (with Incasso) I am only delaying the inevitable.

 

In terms of the charging order should I lay my cards on the table now re. Neg equity? That let them no there is nothing for them and they will essentially be flogging the proverbial dead horse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was posting in the hope PPI would be an issue. Sorry but I am not up to helping on the issues of charging orders. I would however explain to them the full situation regarding your circumstances.

 

I was not aware that Tesco were a company that would do this, especially at this time of year. :shock:

 

I will now shop at ASDA/Morrisons as a personal protest. I know this is no help to your plight but principles come into play here.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

- Incasso obtained a CCJ against my ex in Sept 09 - I am not sure what the current status of that is

 

Have Incasso started the Charging Order application process?

 

- is it reasonable to include in any defence to a county court claim, that I have gone a significant life changing event (seperation) which could not have been anticipated when I took the loan out. As a result of this I was forced to prioritise my debts and as a result unsecured debts went unpaid

 

That isn't a defence to the fact that you owe the money. You might wish to apply to vary the judgment to affordable instalments, you can do this via the n245 form. It costs £35 to do so and could prevent a charging order if you keep up with the instalments.

- is a reasonable defence to a charging order the fact my house is in negative equity? It is worth circa 165k but currently has loans (main mortage and second charge) of around 205k?

Very reasonable.

 

Have you other unsecured debts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get that variation application sorted ASAP, If you can obtain instalments it would prevent them from being able to secure a charging order. More info here:

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 08 Reducing Payments Or Suspending A Bailiffs Warrant On A County Court Judgment

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

As for the equity thing, I guess it depends on how long is left on your mortgage, if you can maintain payments for the next say 40 years on the mortgage it means that in 40 years there may be enough equity for tesco - unfortunately companies have time on their hands, so they may be looking very long term on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been in touch with GirlAloud by pm. We have a common denominator....Tesco/Incasso and now Cobbetts. She maybe posting on here again soon. Just subbed so I know when it happens.

 

Costa

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...