Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

anyone actually written off their credit card debt in full


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5078 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,i would like to hear from anyone who has actually written off their credit card debt by disputing enforceability of credit card agreement.

i have found many companies that handle credit card claims,but i want to give my case to a solicitor directly but cant find a good no win no fee solicitor that specialises in thiese kind of claims.

 

or maybe i should try it myself?

any info or advice will be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unenforceable CCA's don't actual result in the debt going away, it just means that until a valid CCA is produced, they cannot enforce payment.

 

sadly, in all bar a very few cases, debts are not written off.

 

my views are my own...seek legal advice if ness

 

the myth about writing off debts

http://www.consumerwiki.co.uk/index.php/The_Myth_of_%27Writing_Off%27_Debt

BBC NEWS | Business | Ministry warns on debt write-offs

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Can you role your consumer credit issues in with bank charges and give them to one company to deal with? I would rather give it to someone to deal with because I am too stressed out to be able to concentrate and find the time and energy needed to do it myself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not going advise anyone using a claims company. They are only intersted in taking money off you.

 

If you want to get it sorted, you'll have to roll your sleeves up and get stuck in like the rest of us. You'll get all the help you need from us.

 

If doing this through a "claims company" was as straight forward as you appear to think, dont you think we would all be doing it?

 

Dont get scammed, do it yourself. Yes its stressful, but very very satisfying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No offence noomill060, but if you had an inckling of what I have been through over the past few years you would understand why I say I am too stressed. I have been a "doer" all my life who would roll up my sleeves just like the rest of you and on behalf of everyone else as well, but I have come to a point where I am mentally and physically unable to do that at present, which is why I posed the question. I have so much on my plate at present that I need to hand the job to someone else to deal with before it's too late and they change the law!

 

Thank you for the advice though, if there is no company out there I may have to forfeit the possibility altogether.

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

No offence noomill060, but if you had an inckling of what I have been through over the past few years you would understand why I say I am too stressed. I have been a "doer" all my life who would roll up my sleeves just like the rest of you and on behalf of everyone else as well, but I have come to a point where I am mentally and physically unable to do that at present, which is why I posed the question. I have so much on my plate at present that I need to hand the job to someone else to deal with before it's too late and they change the law!

 

Thank you for the advice though, if there is no company out there I may have to forfeit the possibility altogether.

 

JQ

 

Personally I wouldn't offer advice about using a claims company. I would google bank charges reclaims companies and read through all of the ones out there that may be of interest to you. The problem is that many companies do charge you for doing it based either on the amount and on the total sum. There is a lot of advice here but the main thing is that it is your life and the choices are there for you. Good Luck and I hope you find what you are looking for.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put all the reclaims and cca requests on hold until you feel stronger and able to deal with it all. Contact the cccs and get them to deal with your creditors until you find yourself in such a place that you feel able.

 

Its what I did 2 years ago when I didnt feel able to handle it myself, and now I have just taken all my debts back off them and have started the process myself.

 

Dont go with one of these companies, their ethics are as noticably absent as that of the DCAs. They will [problem] you. Put it all on hold until you feel able, with the help of everyone here, to deal with it.

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for info guys,i want to challenge the credit card companies myself.

im looking for template to write first letter to credit card companies requesting credit card agreement.i cant find the templates can someone give me the link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

cca request template.

 

 

 

Name & Address

Date

Dear Sir / Madam

 

 

Re: Account No: .......... XXXX

 

 

With reference to the above account, I would be grateful for a signed copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79), I am entitled to receive a copy of this agreement upon request. I therefore enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

 

I understand that a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

 

I also understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

Yours faithfully (Print name)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have. Its due to the credit agreement being irredeemably unenforceable - it only really works with agreements taken out before April 2007, as the law changed under the Consumer Credit Act 2006. The old law (that is, the law pre-april 2007) applies to credit agreements taken out before Apruil 2007 - basically, if the credit agreement is flawed, the law says it is not properly executed and this means it cannot be enforced - the process involves litigation that takes several months to obtain a "declaration of unenforceability" from the Court - best part is the Court has no choice where the breaches are of "prescribed" terms.:)

 

The banks are being very underhanded with a negative pr campaign about claims management companies - fair enough, there are some dodgy ones out there (look out for creditcardkiller.com - and stay well away from their service its a rip off), but there are plenty of regulated genuine ones out there. In my case there was a fee for an audit of the credit agreement and then the claim is on a no win no fee basis, so the bank pays your legal fees as part of the claim.

 

I have around 80k of unsecured debt that I am in the process of challenging. Interestingly though, I stopped paying them months ago and they have never brought any court action against me - I imagine this is because I have written and verbally told them that the debt is in dispute and the OFT guidance on unfair business practices states clearly that it is an unfair practice to ignore a borrower who says the debt is in dispute - guess what, if the debt is in dispute the lender cant enforce it - its the law. Fantastic! :D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for fantastic reply very informative.i have about 50k outstanding pre 2007 and 20 k after 2007 .i will be giving cases to a claims management firm as i have now stopped paying them.the credit cards taken out after 2007 amout to 20k im thinking of an iva or something to deal with them.

 

i have considered taking the banks on myself but feel paying around 600 pounds for about 5 agreements to be dealt with by a claims management firm who are regulated by ministry of justice seems like a good deal.as i dont want to be giving myself too much stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have. Its due to the credit agreement being irredeemably unenforceable - it only really works with agreements taken out before April 2007, as the law changed under the Consumer Credit Act 2006. The old law (that is, the law pre-april 2007) applies to credit agreements taken out before Apruil 2007 - basically, if the credit agreement is flawed, the law says it is not properly executed and this means it cannot be enforced - the process involves litigation that takes several months to obtain a "declaration of unenforceability" from the Court - best part is the Court has no choice where the breaches are of "prescribed" terms.:)

 

The banks are being very underhanded with a negative pr campaign about claims management companies - fair enough, there are some dodgy ones out there (look out for creditcardkiller.com - and stay well away from their service its a rip off), but there are plenty of regulated genuine ones out there. In my case there was a fee for an audit of the credit agreement and then the claim is on a no win no fee basis, so the bank pays your legal fees as part of the claim.

 

I have around 80k of unsecured debt that I am in the process of challenging. Interestingly though, I stopped paying them months ago and they have never brought any court action against me - I imagine this is because I have written and verbally told them that the debt is in dispute and the OFT guidance on unfair business practices states clearly that it is an unfair practice to ignore a borrower who says the debt is in dispute - guess what, if the debt is in dispute the lender cant enforce it - its the law. Fantastic! :D

 

hi,thanks for the info,very helpful.

did you challenge them yourself?

have the credit card firms given in and written off or are they just ignoring you but debt is still outstanding.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes very informative! When you say pre 2007, do you mean the agreement only, or the actual debt, ie, if you had a credit card from the 90s and the full debt has accrued over the past year or two, does that still qualify? Also, are we permitted to ask which company you used?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes very informative! When you say pre 2007, do you mean the agreement only, or the actual debt, ie, if you had a credit card from the 90s and the full debt has accrued over the past year or two, does that still qualify? Also, are we permitted to ask which company you used?

 

credit cards were obtained many years ago before 2007.i have not actually appointed a company yet but im thinking of giving case to monster claims .the balances some are old some new but agreements were over 5 years ago.i think i should qualify for debt write off.

i was thinking of doing myself ,but to avoid unnessesary stress im thinking of instructing a claims company.

any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well most people here would advise you not to pay an upfront fee. There are companies that do this without charging you upfront and also which let you keep 100% of your compensation (debt write off).

 

The problem with paying an upfront fee is you are caught, if they don't do the job for you, and they sit on your money, you still have the debt and you have lost your money. Check out this comment, it might give you an insight.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/198695-validity-claims-management-companies-21.html#post2292185

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well most people here would advise you not to pay an upfront fee. There are companies that do this without charging you upfront and also which let you keep 100% of your compensation (debt write off).

 

The problem with paying an upfront fee is you are caught, if they don't do the job for you, and they sit on your money, you still have the debt and you have lost your money. Check out this comment, it might give you an insight.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/198695-validity-claims-management-companies-21.html#post2292185

 

thanks for your advice.i have checked out (debt write off),they are not taking any new cases they are waiting for advice from barristers regarding some test case.they will be in a position to advise me further in august next month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been approached by so many companies that purport to be able to 'write off' debts. If you care to read back over the forum, people who try (and say they suceed) in this endeavour, take months ,years and lots of work. Please don't be so naeive and say that 'well they can get paid if it's successful. work it out, offices staff phones wages etc etc for an unguaranteed return. Why would Any company want to get engaged in this without payment up front?. If they did they would not be arround to see the result would they? If you dispute this then you clearly need to stay employed and don't open a business. The whole point of all of this is that you've got to take the companies to the edge. Will you be prepared to go to court? Can you take the costs if you lose? What you will probably find is you are at an impasse with these companies. They can't enforce but won't write off. Will you take them to court to get it written off?The debt stays but they can't or won't enforce. So you wait out 6 years and they go away on their own. But please don't look for shining knights to come along and do it all for nothing. No I don't run a claims company I don't think that would be a good long term investment. I just loathe banks. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Yes, I have. Its due to the credit agreement being irredeemably unenforceable - it only really works with agreements taken out before April 2007, as the law changed under the Consumer Credit Act 2006. The old law (that is, the law pre-april 2007) applies to credit agreements taken out before Apruil 2007 - basically, if the credit agreement is flawed, the law says it is not properly executed and this means it cannot be enforced - the process involves litigation that takes several months to obtain a "declaration of unenforceability" from the Court - best part is the Court has no choice where the breaches are of "prescribed" terms.:)

 

The banks are being very underhanded with a negative pr campaign about claims management companies - fair enough, there are some dodgy ones out there (look out for creditcardkiller.com - and stay well away from their service its a rip off), but there are plenty of regulated genuine ones out there. In my case there was a fee for an audit of the credit agreement and then the claim is on a no win no fee basis, so the bank pays your legal fees as part of the claim.

 

I have around 80k of unsecured debt that I am in the process of challenging. Interestingly though, I stopped paying them months ago and they have never brought any court action against me - I imagine this is because I have written and verbally told them that the debt is in dispute and the OFT guidance on unfair business practices states clearly that it is an unfair practice to ignore a borrower who says the debt is in dispute - guess what, if the debt is in dispute the lender cant enforce it - its the law. Fantastic! :D

 

 

How can I tell if the Credit Agreement is "Flawed"?

In my SAR I got a copy of the form with my signature, so no luck in telling the company that bought my debt to "Do one" :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5078 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...