Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nat West Bank Charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in the process of writing to the Nat West Bank for the return of charges amounting to £4,300. Their first response was to offer me £1,500 as a gesture of good will. I rejected this offer and received a letter from Stuart Higley increasing the offer to £2,400. I am just about to send another letter rejecting this offer. I am going to hold out for the full amount. Has anyone else had 2 offers from them? Why dont they just cough up the full amount instead of haggling? All these offer letters they are sending must be costing them a fortune at £38 a throw!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well you should consider yourself one of the elite.

Most people only get one offer..... Some none at all. :)

 

Follow the well-tried and tested procedures in this forum and you WILL get ALL of your bank charges back.

 

Good luck with your claim.

  • Confused 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think I have had two offers?

Just lucky, I guess.:lol:

 

Do you think I will get a third?

Yes.....When they settle. But you have a bit of work to do, first.:lol:

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK guys. Not been on here for a few weeks because I just didnt have the cash to proceed further with MCOL. Have just issued claim online this morning so I guess its now a waiting game. Copies of schedule in envelopes to post to Natwest and courts on my way to work. Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Amy. Yes I sent a copy to the bank and a copy to the courts both with a covering letter. To the courts, covering letter quoted claim number and then just a paragraph saying "I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of charges to be attached to the above claim. I have also sent a further copy to the defendent". The one to the bank quoted claim number and a paragraph saying "further to my recent correspondence, I have issued a Moneyclaim against you, ref: ....... and am enclosing a further copy of the schedule of charges for your records.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can amend the claim but that would cost you money. What some ppl do is wait until their claim is settled and start claim number 2 for the charges since MCOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I;m not aware of it directly as a result of claiming money back, unless the account is managed by Credit Management Services, but that is what this department does, gets the overdrawn amount back and closes the account. However, I have seen a HSBC thread where the person appealed against the closure of their account and kept theirs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Haha 1

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read that thread Paul. Its very worrying that you could be asked to return your cards and cheque book. Some people will have bad credit because of missed payments due to bank charges and not be able to get another account. Its a joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AQ filed with response to defence and my own CPR part 18 request for disclosure of actual cost. Just waiting now!

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, guys

 

I've posted up a second letter I've sent to NatWest relating to their request for return of my chequebook and card. Apart from anything else, I think it underlines the importance of having a parachute account - with more money in it than mine has at the moment!

Westy

 

 

 

If you like my post, click the scales!!

 

Nov 1 2006 Preliminary letter

21 Feb 2007 - cheque arrived for charges+DEBIT interest +Statutory Interest! Hurray!

Read all about it: natwesttookmymoney - v- NatWest

DONATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN TO KEEP THE SITE GOING.

 

What can you claim? Vampiress has a good idea:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/69877-what-can-you-claim.html

Anything I say is just a suggestion. I'm a bigmouth, not a lawyer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...