Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Specialist Motor Finance Ltd Car HP - Car Repossessed now chasing balance.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1241 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Because it a was direct debit I never saw their bank details

I've now got their details

but they still want £559 by tomorrow or enforcing default notice,

 

 

I'm drafting a letter to them to say they can't issue default as not 3 months behind

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

as per those guidelines and the consumer credit act.

migt be better to get a time order running .

or state if they don't accept your offer

you will do a time order

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive just drafted this up to send to them tomorrow.

 

 

In regard to the above finance, I'm writing to ask that I'm given time to clear the arrears as my partner has just returned to work and have faced financial hardship over the last few weeks, I'm offering £180 a week to clear the arrears but will make the monthly payments as normal when due.

 

I have received a default notice, but as per the guidelines from consumer credit act, a default is issued after 3 - 6 missed payments, but yet I have received the default after only 2 missed payments if you cannot agree to the payments I have offered above I shall have no other option but to issue time order of the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

with regard to the arrears on the above account number.

 

I have tried numerous times to come to some arrangement to clear the arrears in a swift and timely manner and also resume normal monthly payments.

 

To date, against the FCA CONC rules which your industry and HP agreements are governed by amongst other guidelines and rules, you have flatly refused to help me.

indeed even to the extent of issuing a Default Notice after my 2nd missed payment, rather than the 3rd, as detailed under the relevant section of the consumer credit act.

 

To be truthful, i'm rather disgusted by the attitude of your whole company, especially area? manager Mr XXX whilst on the phone stating that I can forget about any more time and must hand the car back immediately.

 

I can assure you I shall be complaining about the way I have been treated without further notice to yourselves in the near future.

 

The arrears will be cleared by payments of £180PCW commencing [date] and I will resume my agreement payments on date

 

Should you fail to accept this offer I will have no alternative than to submit a time order.

 

 

regards

 

 

disgruntled customer

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gonna issue time order, I just don't trust them, got told that uts oy guidelines and 215 a week with 497 on 31st. And that I'm not trusted as I'm now out of work, explained part we back in work and they said so it's in ur name not his

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you highlight exactly which section this is as I cannot find it? Genuinely interested. Ta.

 

 

post 23 attachment and look at the DN section 87

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have No Axe To Grind so I say it from both sides

 

1. All paperwork uploaded on here seems fully compliant with CCA.

 

2. The notion expressed that you have to miss 3 payments for a DN is misconceived. I have seen Counsel's Opinion that 2 missed payments is sufficient for a DN.

 

3. The refusal by the Creditor to take a smaller payment than that demanded is concerning.

I know someone who worked at the Creditor who said he overheard Collectors saying this all the time.

 

They were incentivised on full repayments.

Apparently the FD overhead this, raised a fuss and an edict was issued to stop this practice.

 

This is certainly detrimental to the customer and can be covered off as follows:

(i) send in a cheque for the lower amount;

(ii) all calls are recorded so simply say "please confirm for the recording that you are refusing to take a payment from me and that you are preventing me from repaying what I owe". Then raise a formal complaint to the Creditor referring to the recording.

This should put a stop to it but if not go to FOS; (iii) ask for a payment card.

This will allow you to make payments whenever you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

a little update

i managed to clear the arrears and the default notice on the 30/06/2017 was the last one received, that was cleared,

I have not heard from them since and have been paying as much as i can a week till i start work on the 20/10/2017,

 

 

I have on several occasion tried to sort this out but no luck,

I'm trying to get the money together to do a time order but it is £250 so i was informed which is a lot to us at the moment.

 

today a guy called at the house at 15.20 and said he had called twice and left cards etc,

i asked him dates and times as we have cctv

he told me wednesday at 4pm and friday at 4pm but as said to him, please hold while i check my cctv,

he then looked lost and confused and even my landlord who has been doing work on the house was here friday

I've just spoke to said he had seen no one come to the door and nothing has been left and after checking cctv no one had called round.

 

Ive been left a notice of termination from 2/10/17 and this i clearly stated was wrong as i had not received any default notices from them and can not do a termination.

 

Any advice been told i have to call them at 8am to stop him coming back and clamping the car

Link to post
Share on other sites

clamp the car?

nope they are not bailiffs

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

'he' cant clamp anything

who is 'he' a repo agent?

 

if so they are totally powerless

and are not bailiffs or anyone with ANY legal powers

 

getting spoofed here struggling.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

clamp it again?

 

you are seriously being had here.

 

this had not been to court

no one can clamp anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they CANNOT CLAMP ANYTHING!!

what are you not understanding....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then call the police

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you say that you cleared DN, did you clear it INSIDE the stated timeframe.

If you didn't then you did NOT remedy the breach.

This allows Creditor to TERMINATE the agreement.

 

 

Once the termination notice is served, the agreement is irreversibly terminated.

In law this cannot be undone and you owe the full amount less an allowance for the proceeds of sale of the vehicle.

 

 

The Creditor then has full power to do what it wants with its vehicle.

It can clamp it if it wishes to effect seizure.

If the agreement is Bill of Sale they have full power to enter your property to do this.

 

Once terminated, if you retain possession by hiding the car you are technically committing theft by depreving the true owner of his asset.

 

 

The termination notice may have words to that effect

- stating that you no longer have permission to use the vehicle.

This wording allows the Creditor to get the car as stolen on the police national computer via the Industry funded Police Unit. You will be pulled over. You should tread very carefully.

 

If you have an HP agreement, all of this assumes that you have paid less than a third.

 

Did you pay by cheque or ask for a payment card like I suggested?

 

This is a guide.

It is not an extract from the CCA.

CCA does nof specify when DN can be served.

I have seen Counsel's Opinion that said one missed payment is not enough but two missed payments is fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't allow payment card just to go bank and pay into their account, can't do cheque as do not have them.

 

This company are very hard to negotiate with, won't accept anything less that what is due, which is understandable. DN was paid in time, I do have this proof.

 

I'm going to issue a time order just till we back on our feet

Link to post
Share on other sites

well luckily there is no bill of sale

but a fleecing 50% int rate.

 

 

has the OP been paying £180 PCW like they say since july?

 

 

there is no right to enter private land and clamp nor tow a car without the OP's permission.

 

 

the DN might well have not been satisfied but to issue a TN 10 weeks later if the OP has now bought the account upto date is something else.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah cross posted

so by 16th july you had paid £683.28?

if so the TN is invalid.

 

 

can you clarify please as the dates of you posts here you hadn't.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid by 16th July for the DN,

 

couldn't do 180 a week as they said no and to do 80 pw,

which I did but have not had any income since start of sept

as both jobs were temp and contracted ended

 

 

now awaiting benefits to start, but I'm due to go full time from 28 October.

 

I have on a few occasions tried to reason with the but nothing I offered less then the monthly payment just till we could get money back on track but they won't allow it.

 

Got all proof the DN was paid, car is now up drive way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I know hat id do

let them take it

the DN was paid off by its date

 

then if they repo ....in their own agreement it states that will be void as the DN was settled and they've not issued a new one?

 

unlawful repo then...you'll get all your moneyback

and IMHO you were very stupid to go there in the first place 50% int rate..MUGGED.

designed to fail.

 

they rip off 1000's every month

about time you got comeuppance on 'em

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...