Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair Penalty Notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was given a TFL Overground Penalty Fare Notice last Monday for quite a silly reason which goes:

 

I'm tapping in at Clapton, on my way to Liverpool Street.

 

 

It's 9AM Monday morning, and as expected rather busy.

The Oyster machine tells me I haven't got enough money

- negative balance

- I'm waiting for the machine to free up.

 

 

By now there's 2 minutes till the train comes,

I'm on my way to a funeral and don't really have time to wait around.

 

 

With around a minute to go,

the machine is finally free,

I see i have a negative balance of 40p and put in 40p to take it to 0 as that's all I have in coins and I don't want to break a note.

 

 

I finish up and by now the trains already in the station,

I tap in,

run down the stairs and catch the train.

 

 

When I get off at Liverpool Street,

the barriers don't let me through;

the guard has a look at my card on his machine and says I still have a negative balance and he's going to have to charge me a Penalty.

 

 

I tell him everything,

but he completely disregards it,

almost as if I'm not even talking and hands me the notice.

 

 

I check the online account a few hours later,

and somehow the 40p I put in hasn't been registered and that's why I was charged.

 

 

I've talked to a station guard and he says there's nothing more I can do about it and I should just pay the 40 quid and get on with it, surely there must be a appeal on the basis of check CCTV etc?

 

 

The other thing I've noticed is on the ticket it says I travelled on the Liverpool Street - Chesunt line

when it was the Liverpool Street - Chingford line -

could I get off based on a technicality here?

 

 

The Chesunt line dosen't even pass through Clapton.

Is there a point in appealing or should I just pay the money?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't labour over these points.

 

Even if the 40p went on : you'd not have had enough balance to pay your fare.

 

In a hurry to get to a funeral?

Top up your Oyster the day before or get to the station earlier,

especially if travelling when the machines / ticket office are likely to have queues.

 

Although you feel the penalty notice is unfair,

it doesn't mean the staff thought you were a 'fare dodger',

where the shouldn't issue a Penalry Fare,

but instead a report for prosecution.....

 

If they don't accept your appeal, you may well have to pay the penalty fare :

after all you didn't have a valid ticket / enough balance on your Oyster.

 

The other thing I've noticed is on the ticket it says I travelled on the Liverpool Street - Chesunt line when it was the Liverpool Street - Chingford line - could I get off based on a technicality here? The Chesunt line dosen't even pass through Clapton. Is there a point in appealing or should I just pay the money?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

This seems to be a more promising approach than

"they should have just let me off, as I was going to a funeral and there was a queue"....

 

I'm minded of the story

(I think this was recalled by OCJ, an 'industry expert') of someone who tried this approach when prosecuted, and the judge commented along the lines of

"Well, if I have to wait & queue to pay for my ticket, you should have to, too!"

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?350293-Will-i-be-prosecuted-What-will-the-outcome-be-(rail-penalty-fares)

The last post of page 1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other thing I've noticed is on the ticket it says I travelled on the Liverpool Street - Chesunt line

when it was the Liverpool Street - Chingford line - could I get off based on a technicality here? .

 

Exceedingly unlikely.

 

All that is necessary is for the prosecutor to identify the 'typing error' and ask to amend the application to read 'Chingford' instead of 'Cheshunt'

 

All Court staff are fully conversant with the modernisation of admin processes and with 'drop-down' menus pre-filling forms as they are created these days it is very easy to see how such an error occurs. Typing in 'CH...' will have pre-filled the first alphabetical location in the drop-down list unless spotted and corrected.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...