Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Going self employed, my friend is worried about what and when to declare


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2957 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello! I am new to the forums, it is great to see such a valuable resource online

Thanks for reading my post! I have looked through all the previous threads and can't seem to find a problem similar to my friend's.

I was wondering if anyone could offer a bit of advice?

 

Basically she has been off work quite along time due to illness, but has been on and off the books at a local restaurant, she has hardly worked there in the last 1-2years. But alongside this, she has been doing tailoring for people on a private basis. She has earnt money from this over the last 2 years, but never declared any of it (some of which did go straight into her bank). It is still way under the income tax thresholds for the years in which she did that work. (so this year £10,600)

She has also been supported by family, and when asked by a creditor to show her income (because she wasn't really paying any and they of course got suspicious when their records with HMRC showed unemployed) she was able to show this in her statements. They had obviously taken her off the books again at the restaurant.

 

Now she is much better and feels like the tailoring business could pick up and potentially be a full time self employed job for her. She wants to register as self employed, but is nervous as to when she should start her earnings from, as she is worried she will get in trouble for the previous years she didn't declare.

 

Do you think its ok if she was to start the self employment from now onwards, which is when she is really going to start work full time. Or do you think it could come back to haunt her in the future.

 

Help would be much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome Itsnotwhatyouknow,

 

Good to see you on the forum, hopefully you will get some advice shortly.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

She will need to inform HMRC of her s/e status within 3 months of initial startup.

Was she in any benefits which would have restricted her working/earning whike these "bank deposits" were going in her account?

  • Haha 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No she has never received any benefits, not sick benefits or job seekers. She felt it was too stressful of a process to go through. Hence relying on the restaurant work and occasional tailoring work to feed herself. Eventually she was living with family who fully supported her until now. She is now ready to go full time with the tailoring and I have advised she go self employed. (she did the tailoring work in absence of any knowledge about Self Assessment - I think her condition could of contributed to lack of understanding the processes involved)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she were to inform HMRC now she could include the last 3 months in her tax return when she receives it, i think from memory NI are notified by HMRC but worth a call followed by a letter to confirm to both

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she phones the HMRC self employed line shew ill be asked when she became self employed and if in the recent past what she has earnt in that time and what her projected income is likely to be. As it is a piffling amount so far they wont be that bothered and just send her a TURN (trader unique reference number) and other paperwork about class 2 and 4 NI and then a tax return in about june for the 2015/16 tax year. They will ask about the business name and what business sector it fits in as they have to produce tons of stats for the government to tell lies about but it is really not that onerous..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If she has earned from the tailoring business in the last 2 years and there is traceable payments going into her bank account then i wouldnt advise trying to cover that up, HMRC can backtax for 6 yrs i believe.

If its a negligible amount and falls under the tax threshold for each year, i would declare it personally, if they choose to investigate her at random as HMRC tend to do and they uncover irregularities after you have told them a later start date, its a can of worms and hassle you dont want

It may involve a small penalty now but alleviates a larger fine later

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

late returns, late payments etc attracted an initial £100 penalty.

 

She would be well advised to employ an accountant to deal with her tax, they are able to claim far more than you would be as an individual. For me, it was worth every penny of the approx £500 a year it costs.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

late returns, late payments etc attracted an initial £100 penalty.

 

She would be well advised to employ an accountant to deal with her tax, they are able to claim far more than you would be as an individual. For me, it was worth every penny of the approx £500 a year it costs.

 

 

Please bare in mind your friend would need a sizeable net income to warrant the use of an accountant, which may be unlikely in the first year or so, if your friend was to earn under 10k net profit doing basic calculations then there would be no tax to pay anyway so paying for an accountant would be almost silly, if your friend earns over the tax threshold by a worthwhile amount then you may want to consider one, just keep good, organized records as they go, I myself have never found the need for a accountant but then I am good with numbers and I really dislike the thought of paying someone for doing a job I can do myself, but that is just personal preference of course :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Now she is much better and feels like the tailoring business could pick up and potentially be a full time self employed job for her.

 

In which case, an accountant would be a sound business decision and would save the OP more than the cost of the accountant.

 

The only silly thing is the suggestion that having one is "almost silly"

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case, an accountant would be a sound business decision and would save the OP more than the cost of the accountant.

 

The only silly thing is the suggestion that having one is "almost silly"

 

Thanks Martin for the little dig there, very helpful and professional slagging of a forum member who simply has an opinion, do you feel threatened by me or something because I do not need to enlist the services of an accountant because I am capable of doing it myself. My post was bang on accurate in its content, if a brand new business start up is going to earn more than 15k NET profit after BASIC expenses in its first year then dang, well done that person, but id doubt it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin for the little dig there, very helpful and professional slagging of a forum member who simply has an opinion, do you feel threatened by me or something because I do not need to enlist the services of an accountant because I am capable of doing it myself. My post was bang on accurate in its content, if a brand new business start up is going to earn more than 15k NET profit after BASIC expenses in its first year then dang, well done that person, but id doubt it.

 

Please enlighten me how i have "slagged" anyone off?

 

I am certainly not threatened in any way, i gave my opinion based on 20 years experience.

 

I fail to see how "sizeable net income" and "worthwhile amount" help the OP in any way, especially from somebody "good with numbers" who chooses to use none.

 

Your post was vague at best and far from "Bang on"

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you even serious haha, so what are you saying, if you have a 50k turnover and a 10k net profit you would enlist the services of an accountant would you, even though your net earnings are already below the tax threshold, to warrant the use of a accountant you either need to admit you need a lot of help with numbers (which is fine) or the accountant needs to 'pay' for themselves, or you need to be a high roller who just generally needs an accountant, but I highly doubt that applies to a small business start up with little initial capital to invest, which is what this sounds like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are of course entitled to your opinion, as i am entitled to mine, lets leave it at that before this takes over the OP's thread

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that she learns how to create a spreadsheet and keep it up to date. If it looks like the turnover is going to approach the VAT threshold then it would be worth someone else looking at the figures to make sure they are right, regardless of the net income. She can also claim for a proportion of heat and light, telephone internet etc as business expenses but I would advise caution on this if she doenst own her own property as it can cause proplems with leases/rental contracts/insurance etc.Better off factoring this into the charge to the customer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for all our replies and assistance. I think maybe I wasn't that clear she is most concerned about though. Its not so much the self-assessment itself, but the worry of leaving it two years before registering for self assessment. She is worried about getting into trouble, as we have been reading up and its seems there is danger of that. We have worked out her earnings and they are no where near the thresholds for either year. Do you really think she needs to mention them at all? She has earnings from different clients for different things, but no massive earnings. It seems it like be hassle for nothing. But I wouldn't know, I'm not experienced with this kind of thing. Hence being on these forums!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody here is going to advise that you keep the last 2 years quiet from HMRC

 

If your friend doesn't disclose then she takes a risk, if she does disclose she may face a penalty for late filing, "she" has to choose her course of action herself

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does she have any paperwork about income/expenditure?

She cant be penalised for late filing as she doesnt have a UTR as self-employed yet but any tax calculated to be due can accrue interest.

For example, if someone makes a few quid selling stuff at fairs and markets and the tax man gets wind of it they will be asked to show something regarding purchase of stock or materials and sales revenue. They will then be told to register as self-employed and the tax man will them make a decision as to whether there is any liability for previous years. Ther is no authomatic penalty that can be applied, only prosecution and they arent going to spend thousands doing that when no tax is due as it will be a massive abuse of process and no conviction possible.

If she phone up to register as self-employed all she has to do is answer the questions she is asked honestly and not proffer anything that could cause confusion. So, would I mention the past(where no tax liability created anyway)? no, unless directly asked.

As she is not claiming benefits there are no repercussions regarding time spent on this or ability to work so nothing to fret about there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...