Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Case still pending after 5 months!


danisahne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband is doing part time cabbing. A fellow cab driver opened the car door when my husband was passing him and our car was damaged on the passenger side. This was back in January and since that time the 2 insurances are in limbo. The 3rd party solicitor closed the case, they say our insurance accepted liability. Out insurance says they never did. Also the 3rd party insurance says they don't know anything about a damage to the side of our car, they say we hit the other cab with our front (even though they had an expert come and check our car out). In addition to that the 3rd party insurance people said several times they cannot find the file which I find very odd. Our insurance told us to chase the 3rd party insurance ourselves :confused: Whenever we speak to our insurance we are promised call backs which never happens.

What can we do not that both insurances obviously don't want to settle this case?

Thanks for anyone that can give advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got the expert report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, we weren't given any copy. However, the police report lists the damage. The 3rd party insurance said they don't know of any police report. Looks like their driver didn't tell them that the police was onsite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you any kind of statement from the other guy? What damage did he suffer to this car? Do you have pics?

 

I would assemble all of the evidence. I would ask to the police for the damage report and the crime reference number.

 

I would then send a 14 day warning of legal action to the other guy and then sue him. Don't send the warning if you don't intend to follow it through. Stick rigidly to all deadlines which you give.

As far as the insurers, I would write to them immediately making a formal complaint to each of them and tell them that youwill be going on to the Ombudsman if they don't sort it out immediately. Tell each of them also that you are beginning legal proceeding against the driver, that you may add his insrurers as a second defendant and that you will expecct to recoup any unpaid costs from them if they fail to adopt the claim onyour behalf.

 

I think that in the new CPUT regs there is a paragraph which seems to apply to insurers. Tell you insurer that their failure to respond to your calls is an unfair commercial practice and that you are sending a formjal complaint to the OFT about this. Makew sure that you do it.

 

Make no threats or promises unless you intend to carry them out.

 

What I am telling you to do here is to very firmly take control of this matter. Brush aside any excuses or nonsense from the insurers. Just go ahead regardless and stir it up with complaints and aggravation everywhere.

Keep a log of all unretruned calls or all unanswered letters. Don't be a sheep, don't be a victim. Set the pace and make sure that you are moving so fast that it is hard for the insurance companies to catch up. This will worry them and they will be more likley to get involved. Even if they do get involved, keep on top of it and "manage" the claim throughout.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Thank you very much. The information really opened our eyes.

 

We opted not to sue our insurance but there are new developments causing us to think if it was the right decision.

 

Until now we did not get a single letter or phone call from the insurance updating us on the status of our claim or telling us what they are doing to get the matter sorted. We received a few letters from the solicitor they involved but that was it. That solicitor said, too, they closed the case. At the beginning of June we found out that our insurance never asked the police for any police report and also until then they did not send anyone to verify the damage. So at the beginning of June we sent them pictures and a letter stating exactly how the accident occured and what the damages are. We sent it with sign for so we know exactly they received it. All the time they said they wrote to the 3rd party insurance again and are waiting for a reply. They probably could have waited 20 or 30 years, they would never have got a reply as they did not escalate the matter. What is more important is they claimed they received our letter but did not receive the pictures which were sent in the same envelope! I was really wondering how they could make a decision without any kind of proof!

Week after week we were chasing them and were told to be patient, some cases take 1-2 years to be solved. We got in touch with the solicitor who agreed to open the case again and yesterday they let us know that they found out our insurance payed they 3rd party expenses, so they basically accepted liability. All the time they were telling us they were still investigating which was obviously a big lie. And we never received any letter stating they accepted liability. Instead, every time we called them they would tell us the case is still open!

 

The problem is, at the time of the accident we only had a 3rd party insurance. So how do we go about now to get our expenses for the car repair payed? This is a big issue because we had a loss of quite a bit of money due to the damaged car (the insurance never gave us a courtesy car because according to them the car was and is still driveable) and my husband is due to renew his cabbing licence which is a real stuggle with a damaged car!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you only had third party insurance then you will need to claim for the damage for your car off the driver who opened the car door which damaged your car.

 

Send an estimate for repair to their insurers or if you don't know who they are send it to the driver of the other car and ask him to pass it onto his insurers. Advise them you will wait 14 days and if you hear nothing you will undertake the repairs and then you will forward the invoice which if they don't pay you will issue County Court Proceedings.

 

Also include any other uninsured losses, hire car, telephone/postage costs, loss of use or loss of earnings etc.

 

Your insurers will do nothing for you because you are not covered for damage to your car, they will defend or deal with any claim that the other driver makes against you and that it is.

 

I suspect the solicitor has closed their case because nobody was injured and therefore there will not be a big fee for them to claim in respect of representing someone.

 

Likewise the police report won't really help, it wont comment on liability which from what you say is fairly straight forward, you were on amain road and a stationary car opened its door into your path causing damage. The onus is on the driver of the other car to ensure it is safe to open the car door therfore they are at fault.

 

Mossy

 

PS You cannot sue your insurers in this instance because you are third party insured therefore they have nothing to do with sorting out the damage to your car. All they really needed to do was send you a letter confirming they had received your claim form notifying them of the accident and asking you to forward any correspondence that you receive relating to a claim against you. If they did that then that's all you paid for and all you can expect. If I was dealing with this claim as your insurers I would tell you to stop bothering me and get on with persuing your own claim directly

Edited by Mossycat
Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the insurers, I would write to them immediately making a formal complaint to each of them and tell them that youwill be going on to the Ombudsman if they don't sort it out immediately.

 

Tell each of them also that you are beginning legal proceeding against the driver, that you may add his insrurers as a second defendant and that you will expecct to recoup any unpaid costs from them if they fail to adopt the claim onyour behalf.

 

 

What I am telling you to do here is to very firmly take control of this matter.

 

As far as the insurers are concerned there is no formal complaint that could be made against the OP's own insurers, they have no obligation to sort out the damage to the OP car, the OP was third party insured.

 

You do not issue against the other insurers as a second defendant. You issue against the third party, if his insurers indemnify him they will deal with it, if they don't then he is on his own. The OP cannot force the other insurers into this.

 

The OP should have taken control from Day 1 because they were third party and as such were always responsible for sorting this out themselves.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just realised that your insurers have paid the third party out, this means that they have acceptec that you were liable for the accident.

 

This will make it virtually impossible for you to win in a claim against the other party.

 

Ask your insurers on what basis they made a payment, did they accept full liability, or was it split and if so what percentage was the split.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just realised that your insurers have paid the third party out, this means that they have acceptec that you were liable for the accident.

 

This will make it virtually impossible for you to win in a claim against the other party.

 

Ask your insurers on what basis they made a payment, did they accept full liability, or was it split and if so what percentage was the split.

 

Mossy

 

The problem is that for us the case is basically still open. Other parties like 3rd party insurance and the solicitor that was involved told us that the case is closed and our insurance paid. We never heard anything from our insurance regarding that except that they sent a letter to the third party and are waiting for a reply. They never sent us a letter stating we put in a claim, they never sent us a letter confirming they received the pictures or updating us on any other status or development. And they did not send us any letter saying the case is closed or anything. For us a decision is still pending.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that for us the case is basically still open. Other parties like 3rd party insurance and the solicitor that was involved told us that the case is closed and our insurance paid. We never heard anything from our insurance regarding that except that they sent a letter to the third party and are waiting for a reply. They never sent us a letter stating we put in a claim, they never sent us a letter confirming they received the pictures or updating us on any other status or development. And they did not send us any letter saying the case is closed or anything. For us a decision is still pending.

 

Your insurers WOULD NOT send you anything relating to your claim, you did not have a claim against them because YOU ARE NOT COMREHENSIVELY INSURED with them, they have nothing to do with the damage to your car and any pictures you may have sent them would simply be held on file to help defend a claim that was made AGAINST you and not BY you.

 

For the record YOU DID NOT put in a claim against your own insurers YOU NOTIFIED them of the accident you were involved in. Until you get that into your head you will never understand the situation!

 

There is no decision still pending between you and your insurers! They were notified of the accident by you, the other person claimed against you, they decided you were at fault and they paid out. Decisions made, case closed. End of.

 

If you had a claim to make and one to pursue it would have been against the insurance company of the other driver, you should have done this from day 1, and it is to them who you should have sent your pictures.

 

If your insurers have paid the other person out then it is case closed as far as they and the other claimant is concerned, the only open issue now is between you and the other persons insurers, which in view of the fact that your own motor insurers have paid the other person would suggest that they think you were at fault and would help strengthen the denial of liability from the other persons insurance company.

 

Until you answer my earlier question about the liability split I cannot advise you any further, if it was on a 100% basis then you are highly unlikely to get anywhere in a claim now.

 

For the record if you have third party insurance (which you have) and you have an accident this is what will happen.

 

You fill in a claim form to notify your insurance company you were in an accident (You did this)

 

They send you a letter letting you know they have received the claim form and will deal with any claim made against you (They did this)

 

The other party makes a claim against you, your insurers defend this or pay it out by writing to them and NOT to you (They did this)

 

Either a payment is made or a payment isn't made and the case is closed (They did this).

 

That's basically all that happens, quite where you get the idea that they should have sent you letters updating you about the status or developments is beyond me. Why would they?

 

It looks to me like they have done all that was required of them, whereas you have done nothing to pursue your claim against the other person.

 

Mossy

Edited by Mossycat
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your insurers WOULD NOT send you anything relating to your claim, you did not have a claim against them because YOU ARE NOT COMREHENSIVELY INSURED with them, they have nothing to do with the damage to your car and any pictures you may have sent them would simply be held on file to help defend a claim that was made AGAINST you and not BY you.

 

For the record YOU DID NOT put in a claim against your own insurers YOU NOTIFIED them of the accident you were involved in. Until you get that into your head you will never understand the situation!

 

There is no decision still pending between you and your insurers! They were notified of the accident by you, the other person claimed against you, they decided you were at fault and they paid out. Decisions made, case closed. End of.

 

If you had a claim to make and one to pursue it would have been against the insurance company of the other driver, you should have done this from day 1, and it is to them who you should have sent your pictures.

 

If your insurers have paid the other person out then it is case closed as far as they and the other claimant is concerned, the only open issue now is between you and the other persons insurers, which in view of the fact that your own motor insurers have paid the other person would suggest that they think you were at fault and would help strengthen the denial of liability from the other persons insurance company.

 

Until you answer my earlier question about the liability split I cannot advise you any further, if it was on a 100% basis then you are highly unlikely to get anywhere in a claim now.

 

For the record if you have third party insurance (which you have) and you have an accident this is what will happen.

 

You fill in a claim form to notify your insurance company you were in an accident (You did this)

 

They send you a letter letting you know they have received the claim form and will deal with any claim made against you (They did this)

 

The other party makes a claim against you, your insurers defend this or pay it out by writing to them and NOT to you (They did this)

 

Either a payment is made or a payment isn't made and the case is closed (They did this).

 

That's basically all that happens, quite where you get the idea that they should have sent you letters updating you about the status or developments is beyond me. Why would they?

 

It looks to me like they have done all that was required of them, whereas you have done nothing to pursue your claim against the other person.

 

Mossy

 

But the point is that every time we call them they say the case is still active and they are waiting for a reply from the 3rd party insurance and they need to chase them for that reply. Even when we told them that we found out the 3rd party insurance and our solicitor closed the case because our insurance accepted liability they said it is not so, they did not accept liability and the case is still open. So we have got 2 conflicting stories: 1 from 3rd party insurance and the solicitor that was involved and another very different one from our own insurance who said to us

 

Be patient, the case is still open and we are waiting to hear back from the other insurance. Some cases take 1-2 years to be solved.
They are flat out lying!

 

Also, we never filled a form in. We opened the claim on the phone. As I stated we were never in any kind of postal contact with the insurance. Not for opening the case and not during the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so you didn't write out a claims form (or more correctly in your case an acciedent notification form), you did it over the phone. Same thing basically.

 

You need to ask your insurers if they have made a payment to the other person, and if so why and was it 100% of the claim they made.

 

Until you post the answers to that back I cannot advise you further

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK write this letter to your own insurers, DO NOT ring it through, write it out and send it to them

 

Dear Sirs

 

RE:

 

I refer to the above regarding an accident on and would appreciate clarification of the following.

 

Have you dealt with a claim from the third party, if so have you made a payment and if so on what basis did you make that payment

 

I am currently persuing my own claim for uninsured losses as I hold the other party responsible for this accident and I am somewhat confused by the different responses I get whenever I discuss this matter with your office.

 

Please confirm in writing the exact current position at your earliest convenience.

 

Kind Regards

 

 

 

 

When you get a response (in writing) post back what it says and we will be able to advise you further

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...