Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK Debts - Living Abroad


davedebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, great site, have found some good advice. Could not find another thread so apologise if done.

 

Basically I owe a 12K on a Lloyds Credit Card, business gone bust, can't pay and am currently trying to find work in Europe. DCA been sending letters to a friends house in UK, he is sending them back, they have a telephone number for a friend who has been helpingme out in France, I have phoned the DCA and told them that I am trying to negotiate with Lloyds directly and will not speak with them.Letters to Lloyds and a requested payment plan have been ignored by Lloyds.

 

What's the chances of them chasing me around Europe,? anyone got any similar experience ?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add, I'm not trying to evade paying my debts, I have made a reasonable offer to lloyds until my situation changes - which obviously they have ignored and passed debt to AIC. I just don't want and can not afford to upset friends who are helping me by them getting hassled by AIC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should send the letter in the library telling the DCA not to call you and that all communication has to be in writing. Here's the link

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/37006-harassment-telephone-response-letter.html

 

Do you know if the card has incurred charges? If it has you should send Lloyds the SAR (and a £10 cheque) by recommandé (French recorded delivery)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

 

If the card has incurred charges when you send the harassment letter to the DCA you should also put the words "THIS DEBT IS IN DISPUTE" on the letter and then they'll have to send all the paperwork back to Lloyds.

 

Make sure you keep copies of all correspondence.

 

Did you send your offer(s) by recorded delivery? If not it may be sensible to send them again but by recorded delivery with letter G in the templates on the General Debt forum - you may need to tweak it a bit to reflect them ignoring your previous attempts

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

Finally, no personal experience of banks/DCAs chasing around France but debt collectors don't stop at the Channel and I do know of people who've been pursued for other UK debts when living abroad.

 

Hope this helps.

 

bb

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there someone in the UK who could forward mail from/to you?

 

Or get a PO box in France? If your local PO doesn't have any available they should be able to tell you where there are vacancies.

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What's the chances of them chasing me around Europe,? anyone got any similar experience ?

Thanks

 

If they obtain a CCJ in britain, then they will almost certainly be able to enforce it in another european country.

 

What type of debt is this?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they obtain a ccj it wil be enforceable in uK only as diffferent country different law. there is no communication between the bank of england and the banque de france, excetion in case they suspect fraud and etc...

 

however if the sum is very large they may be able to sure you abroad. if you are infrance you could find yourselves with an "interdit banquaire" they passed your detail which mean it will be very difficult for you to open a bank account, obtain credit , etc.... and beware charges are common over there too !!!

 

i doubt they will take this action as it is quite expensive for them to find you abraod sending demand etc...... .

 

for the adress it is quite easy to open a PO box in france.

 

however what they could do get a ccj in uk to your known last adress and when you get back start reclaiming the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they obtain a ccj it wil be enforceable in uK only as diffferent country different law. there is no communication between the bank of england and the banque de france, excetion in case they suspect fraud and etc...

 

however if the sum is very large they may be able to sure you abroad. if you are infrance you could find yourselves with an "interdit banquaire" they passed your detail which mean it will be very difficult for you to open a bank account, obtain credit , etc.... and beware charges are common over there too !!!

 

i doubt they will take this action as it is quite expensive for them to find you abraod sending demand etc...... .

 

for the adress it is quite easy to open a PO box in france.

 

however what they could do get a ccj in uk to your known last adress and when you get back start reclaiming the money.

 

Thanks for the reply,

 

Lloyds did not have the decency to respond to my letters offering reduced payments, been with them 15 years !

 

Not sure if it is better to open communication with AI or just ignore them. Also is it worth going down CCA request and contesting CCJ ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't ignore them as . if i were you ask them a copy of the CCA , only cost 1 pounds, and start your letter with this I DO NOT ACKNOWLDEGE ANY DEBT OT YOUR COMPANY NOR ANY COMPANY THAT YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT.

 

if you are in the process to have a CCJ yes then contest it as it is probable that they don't have the right paperwork adn so have their claim to be struck out.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

don't ignore them as . if i were you ask them a copy of the CCA , only cost 1 pounds, and start your letter with this I DO NOT ACKNOWLDEGE ANY DEBT OT YOUR COMPANY NOR ANY COMPANY THAT YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT.

 

if you are in the process to have a CCJ yes then contest it as it is probable that they don't have the right paperwork adn so have their claim to be struck out.

 

 

Thanks again, are there any threads on this forum naming the unenforceable CCA's ? Also how effective is the request for CCA and if they don't respondin time ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

to know if your agreement is enforceable check this

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/105315-my-agreement-enforceable-useful.html

 

however if you can scan it then do it but obviously remove all personal details. there is a lot of person far more knowledgeable than me who can help you .

 

if you request it and after 12 days you can legally withhold any payment to them. after one month they are in default. it put your account into dispute and they cannot enforce it nor passed it on to any third party until they have comply with your request.

 

it s quite useful i was able via the CCa route to have 2 debt squashed and i repaid some others at a greatly discounted price. when you are erquesting your CCA ask also for a deed of assignment if the debt has been sold to a DCA ( if it is not an absolute one then they cannot apply for a CCJ) good luck.

 

sorry for my typo lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they obtain a ccj it wil be enforceable in uK only as diffferent country different law. there is no communication between the bank of england and the banque de france, excetion in case they suspect fraud and etc...

 

If they get a CCJ they can then go for a statutory demand and then bankruptcy and they can do this regardless of whether you are in France - by which I mean they can serve a statutory demand on you in France and they can serve a Bankruptcy Petition on you in France.

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they get a CCJ they can then go for a statutory demand and then bankruptcy and they can do this regardless of whether you are in France - by which I mean they can serve a statutory demand on you in France and they can serve a Bankruptcy Petition on you in France.

 

 

wILL THEY NEED A PHYSICAL ADDRESS FOR THIS

Link to post
Share on other sites

botom up i would like to know i know someone close who was in the same situation but that never happened as they could not apply French law within an UK border . ( no pun intended, sorry lol )

 

to get a bankrupcy in france, you must constitute your file to the banque de france and as they have no communication betwen BOE and la banque de france and that an order of judgement has no value in france only within UK.

however and this is what i said previously, by ignoring this problem it could lead to CCJ, bankrupcy etc.. in Uk and when he /she will return then the problem will arise ther and then . this is what i advised to him to opn a PO box in france then ask for a CCA and start from there.

 

tuhe law to chase a debt into an other country are very complicated, and i think they will only doi it if a very large sum of money is owed.

 

i have some french friend with "interdit banquaire" which are opening bank account into an other country, such as belgium, germany, etc.. so they get acces to cheque book , debit card etc.... as ther is no communication between the banque de france.

 

bankrupcy in france is very harsh,. usually people are really struggling to havea bankaccount, no debit crd whatsoever if they get one ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having lived in France, and many other European countries, I know what "bancaire interdit" is and, frankly, it is totally irrelevant to this topic.

 

Yes davedebt, they will need a physical address BUT if they don't have one they can go to court and ask for "substituted service". Plenty on the web about that and here's an example - http://www2.blackpooltoday.co.uk/publicnotices/27-05-05/12992234.pdf

 

If they win the statutory demand case they can then bankrupt you. It doesn't matter where you are - you are in the EEC and EEC law applies.

Someone I know very well had a statutory demand served on him in France by an English yob debt collector (probably lived reasonably near). By the way to check it was the right person they got a private investigator to send him a letter, by recommandé (so he had to sign for it) but there was nothing in the envelope...but they'd got his signature...

  • Haha 1

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ihi bottomburrp i did not says that you comment were invalid. Having studied french lawi can tell you that english law cannot be enforcved in france as they have no JURISDICTION in France. so the bankrupcy can only be enforced in UK and that is it.

if they wish to chase the debt in france then they will have to comply with the french procedure which is not irrelevant as you may suggest, but rather expensive and legally complicated. he may get an interdit bancaire if he is been chased infrance for this debt. althgouh i doubt it very much they will go that far.

 

your friend mayhave a statutory demandbut it canonly beenforce in UK as far as know, as this taturotry demand was amde in Uk not infrance. howeve if the stat demand was made inf rance then well he has to comply with

 

the example you mention with the investigator well it is class as an unfair practice and may as well be seen as fraud...

 

 

 

however he mentined that he has tried to contact LLoyds toward his debt and he is getting ignored by them so a CCA will do very well in his case .however iof the debt ot trace him is too high then they simply write the debt oof as the status of limitation will apply. it is very rare unless the debt is really large 100k+,or the moeny was acquied by fraud theft tc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, my understanding that 12k in banking terms is not a huge debt so chances they chase me around Europe is slim,I would hope. I will try the CCA request. Not sure how effective it will be though. I expect they will go to CCJ, as I'm not in the UK would be difficult for me to attend and therefore defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the bankrupcy can only be enforced in UK and that is it.

 

Exactly, the bankruptcy can be enforced in the UK, so can the statutory demand, so can the CCJ - it doesn't matter where davedebt happens to be at the time - they can ALL be enforced in the UK. Having been enforced in the UK they can then start proceedings to get bailiffs round etc to enforce them in France.

 

I said all your comments about "bancaire interdit" were irrelevant in this situation. I did not say French laws were irrelevant - please read my post again.

 

It is NOT particularly complicated to start legal proceedings in France to enforce JUDGEMENTS entered against you in the UK and many UK law firms have "relationships" with other European law firms for just this sort of thing.

 

I don't know which nationality you are but you don't appear to be French. I don't mean to be impolite to you I may perhaps know a bit more than you about BRITISH insolvency law and how BRITISH creditors chase BRITISH debtors in foreign countries - being British and having lived in these countries myself.

 

I realise you are trying to be helpful but what you have said so far is really so wrong I would laugh if it wasn't for the fact that someone may take your advice and get seriously damaged because of it.

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

davedebt - I seriously recommend you have a good read through the debt forums. Many of your questions will be answered there. The actions you should take are the same as they would have been if you were still in the UK. The consequences, if you do not do something about this, are enforceable whether you are in France or not.

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they obtain a ccj it wil be enforceable in uK only as diffferent country different law. there is no communication between the bank of england and the banque de france, excetion in case they suspect fraud and etc...

 

Pardon?

 

We are talking about the enforcement of a civil judgement in another european jurisdiction; in most cases this is covered by the Judgments Regulation 2000 (which replaced the Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters of 1968 for all EU countries save for Denmark) and the Lugano Convention which applies to EFTA countries;

 

This is the procedure to enforce a european judgement in England, presumably (since these regulations are european law) they are similar in france:

 

Judgments of European Countries

 

Judgments of European countries can be registered by a fairly straightforward procedure. Notice of Registration is then served on the judgment debtor, who has the opportunity to apply to set aside the registration, but only on very limited grounds which are set out in Art. 27 of the Brussels Regulation.

 

The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, as amended by the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3929) brings into effect in English law the treaties under which judgments of the signatory States of the relevant conventions will be enforced. The 10 States which joined the European Union on 1st May 2004 are parties to the Judgments Regulation.

 

Significantly, under the treaties not only final money judgments, but also injunctions, including interlocutory injunctions, will be enforced.

Under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 judgments of Courts of Member States of the EC may be registered by a procedure similar to that under the 1920 or 1933 Act. Article 31 of the Conventions States,

“A judgment given in a Contracting State and enforceable in that State shall be enforced in another Contracting State when, on the application of any interested party, the order for its enforcement has been issued there.”

 

Given that the Convention provides a uniform means of ascertaining jurisdiction, once time for applying to set aside registration has expired, the judgment can be enforced by the same means as an English judgment.

The Brussels Convention provides for the recognition and enforcement of a judgment from one Contracting State in other Contracting States.

Recognition of a foreign judgment given in a Contracting State shall be recognised in another Contracting State without any special procedure being required. The Convention expressly sets out circumstances in which the Court of a State in which recognition is sought must not be recognised.

 

These are set out in Article 27 of the Brussels Regulation as follows:

Recognition is contrary to public policy of the State in which recognition is sought.

 

Where the judgment was given in default of appearance, if the defendant was not duly served with the document which instituted the proceedings or an equivalent document in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his defence.

 

If judgment is irreconcilable with a judgment given in a dispute between the same parties in the State in which recognition is sought.

 

If the Court of the State of origin, in order to arrive at its judgment, has decided a preliminary question concerning the status of legal capacity of natural persons, rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship, wills, succession in a way that conflicts with a rule of private international law in the State in which recognition is sought, unless the same result would have been reached by the application of the rules of private international law of the State.

 

If the judgment is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment given in a non-contracting State involving the same cause of action and between the same parties, provided that this latter judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the State addressed.[1]

 

The Convention provides that an application for enforcement may only be refused for one of the reasons specified in Art. 27 (see above) and Art. 28[2].

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alternatively, as people have mentioned, a bankruptcy order issued in england will be valid throughout the EU, and service can be achieved out of jurisdiction.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think in phill123's defence he has advised that I follow the usual routes and he has acknowledged that they can chase the debt in Europe. I think the question really is what is the likelyhood they would chase it for 12k and no real chance of actually retrieving any of it at this moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...