Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest step-by-step Complaints Procedure.


banking idiot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6298 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all.

 

I am just sending out my LBA. I have included a paragraph about that they have not followed their complaints procedure and it is being sent to a free post address.

 

Step-by-step Complaints Procedure

We want to:

  • Make it easy for you to raise your complaint
  • Listen to your complaint
  • Consider how you'd like us to remedy your complaint
  • Make sure you're satisfied with how your complaint was handled

How and where to complain

 

In personVisit any of our branches and speak to one of our staff.

Use our Branch Locator to find your nearest branch.In writingAddress your letter to The Manager of your branch or your Relationship Manager.

Use our Branch Locator to find the address for your branch.By telephone

Use your usual number for contacting the Bank, 24 hours a day.On-line

Complete our on-line form. Please note that additional personal information should not be included in this message for security reasons. We will respond by telephone or letter for the same reason.

How long will it take?

 

ImmediatelyOur aim is to resolve your complaint straightaway.Two daysIf we haven't resolved your complaint within one week, we'll write to you:

1) Explain why we haven't managed to resolve your complaint

2) Tell you how long we expect to take to resolve it

3) Tell you who is dealing with your complaint

Two weeksIn most cases, we'll resolve your complaint within two weeks.

If we haven't resolved it within two weeks, we'll contact you (normally by phone) to update you.After two weeksWe'll keep you informed on a regular basis until your complaint has been resolved.

In exceptional circumstances, where your complaint is particularly complex, matters may take longer to resolve.

If this is the case, your complaint may be passed to our Customer Relations Unit who will continue to try to resolve it.Eight weeksIn the unlikely event we can't reach an agreement with you by the end of eight weeks, we'll send you a 'Final Response' letter, which will explain our final position, or, a letter giving reasons for the delay in resolving your complaint and an indication of when we expect to reach a conclusion.

We'll tell you about the Financial Ombudsman Service and how to contact them about this complaint.

What if you're not happy with our response?

 

Our aim is that your complaint should be resolved as quickly as possible by staff who have the right experience, knowledge and authority.

If you're not satisfied by our action or explanation your case can be reviewed at a higher level within the Bank.

Our Customer Relations Unit is a specialist team who'll investigate your complaint fully and aim to reply within two weeks. If the investigation is likely to take longer, they'll keep you fully informed.

You can write to the Customer Relations Manager (address below). Please quote your account number, branch sort code, details of your complaint and what you'd like the Bank to do to resolve it.

NatWest Customer Relations

FREEPOST NAT12685

BOREHAMWOOD

WD6 1BR

Our Customer Relations Unit number is: 0800 015 4212. (If you have speech or hearing difficulties and are a textphone user, you can call us on 0800 917 0527).

Overseas callers should dial + 00 44 20 7649 9315.

If together we can't reach agreement

 

The Bank is a member of the Financial Ombudsman Service and if we can't reach agreement with you, our Customer Relations Unit will send you a 'final response' letter. This letter will clearly set out the Bank's position in relation to your complaint.

The Financial Ombudsman Service

 

Our aim is to resolve all complaints internally. However if you are not satisfied with our suggested resolution, or if eight weeks have passed since you first brought your complaint to our attention, you have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If you want the Financial Ombudsman Service to look into your complaint, you must contact them within six months of the date of any final response issued.

You can write to them at:

The Financial Ombudsmen Service

South Quay Plaza

183 Marsh Wall

London

E14 9SR

Alternatively you can phone 0845 080 1800. Further helpful information can be obtained from visiting the Financial Ombudsman web site at www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk

The Financial Ombudsman Service offers a free independent service and they can help with most financial complaints. However, there are some limitations on what the Financial Ombudsman Service can look into, and further information about this can be obtained from them directly.

We are committed to resolving your complaint fairly and quickly. In most cases this can be done if you contact us as soon as possible. We will try to resolve your complaint by listening to your concerns and agreeing a solution with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have included the following paragraph in my LBA expressing that with this process they are breaching their own complaints proceduer:

In addition I would like to draw to your attention that you have not followed your own complaints procedure.

If we haven't resolved your complaint within one week, we'll write to you:

1) Explain why we haven't managed to resolve your complaint

2) Tell you how long we expect to take to resolve it

3) Tell you who is dealing with your complaint

In most cases, we'll resolve your complaint within two weeks.

If we haven't resolved it within two weeks, we'll contact you (normally by phone) to update you.

We'll keep you informed on a regular basis until your complaint has been resolved.

In exceptional circumstances, where your complaint is particularly complex, matters may take longer to resolve.

If this is the case, your complaint may be passed to our Customer Relations Unit who will continue to try to resolve it.

These are your words not mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your complaint will be passed to our customer relations unit. Where do the letters get sent? here is a big clue.....they are based in borehamwood and the initials are CRU. That is the advice I have given for the last month and a half. Prelim letters and LBA to Customer Relations Unit Borehamwood.

I am still lost here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your complaint will be passed to our customer relations unit. Where do the letters get sent? here is a big clue.....they are based in borehamwood and the initials are CRU. That is the advice I have given for the last month and a half. Prelim letters and LBA to Customer Relations Unit Borehamwood.

I am still lost here.

 

Nattie

 

not sure there is really any need for the sarcasim directed at the author. Without doubt you have knowledge of the system and this letter may actully confuse or get you lost. But your response is a little patronising!

 

You need to be a touch more restrained, dont want to sound like a Customer Service Advisor, does one!!!!

4th Dec 2006 : Posted S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) :o

18th Dec 2006 ; Received Statements :)

28th Dec 2006 ; Posted prelim letter (£3351.00) :rolleyes:

11th Jan 2007 : Reply, still investigating :x

16th Jan 2007 : Posted LBA (£3331.00/£556.00) :-(

31st Jan 2007 : Bank make offer of £3331.00 :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never really been worried what people do or do not think of me, period. I just do not see what the OP is suggesting that NatWest are not following complaints procedures when all the way through over the last few months there have been posts stating a response to a prelim letter is that they will respond within 10 days(a holding letter) as the OP has suggested and these responses were called "delaying tactics". Now they are being dealt with by customer relations unit they are still "delaying tactics". What more can I add? The process as set out has been followed by most people and customer relations are now dealing with all letters. If you want, I can say brilliant letter nodding like a dog, going along with the crowd, but that is not me. I call it as I see it, like it or hate it. Yes, I am sarcastic at times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nattie You Have missed the point of my reply!!

 

I always smile to myself when people say "this is me dont care what people think etc etc." Half expecting a blast of My Way, or I am What I am " to follow :lol:

 

My point was that the author had spent time relaying their information on their thread. Whilst this opens them up to views/thoughts/opinions etc surley it has to be constructive, blunt, direct . But constructive. Its not about being some kind of nodding dog (!), just respectful abouts someones elses expreinece

 

This process is diffcult enough without having your thoughts/expreinces almost riduclued. I guess I come from a diffrent mindest. that belives its better to say nothing at all if you cannot say anything positive. But I guess thats me, I am what I am or will do it my wayyyyyyyyyy:D

4th Dec 2006 : Posted S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) :o

18th Dec 2006 ; Received Statements :)

28th Dec 2006 ; Posted prelim letter (£3351.00) :rolleyes:

11th Jan 2007 : Reply, still investigating :x

16th Jan 2007 : Posted LBA (£3331.00/£556.00) :-(

31st Jan 2007 : Bank make offer of £3331.00 :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point taken so apologies if the OP feels offended. The quote is from the NatWest Website, if I am correct on the wording.

As I pointed out, NatWest have been following complaints procedures but on this site it has been called "delaying tactics" which on most initial posts that I have read has not been the case, athough I accept that in some cases no response is clearly not following the procedures in place.

In relation to customer relations unit, the most recent ones have shown that some letters have been written to state that the case is going to CRU. I will have a look at your thread Banking Idiot and see if in your case specifically that this has not been adherred to and will edit the bottom of this post. Then I will get my coat:D

 

Ok read the thread and within 10 working days a response was given so one aspect was not followed acknowledginging the complaint and that was by 5 days so instead a holding letter was sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...