Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm sure I've said before that it's fine and dandy bringing in rules that favour you or your party, but you have to consider how it would play out if your opponents get in and want to use the same rules...
    • Its Gaelic celebration and bonfires today - Beltane Quite fortuitous for tomorrow lets hope
    • look on the bright side - it would allow Biden to do what he likes ...
    • Few tweaks as the run order was completely messed up and the main point of your defence (reconstituted agreement) pushed to the bottom of the statement.   I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in this claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. 1.The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act. 2.  I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment. 3. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party. 4.  I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 5. The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’. The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents. 6. Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 7. Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicitor's is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’ 8. On (insert date) I successfully made application to set a side the judgment. The claim proceeded to allocation, 9. The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. (insert date you did receive the documents) I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’. Remove irrelevant 10.The claimant relies upon and has exhibited a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement. It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HHJ Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’. The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause. 11. Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not mislead the court. 12. It is denied I have ever received a default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.The claimant is put to strict proof to evidence from the original creditors internal document software the trigger of said notice.  13.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. 14. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024   Run 3 copies Court /Claimants Sol/File
    • As one of you mentioned above I've been in a mess for nearly 20 years now and I'm ready to sort my credit report out now - the main reason I got into second round of debt is my kids being unwell and the state considering them not unwell enough for extra help so despite my son being in hospital for 3 months in one year we got extra zero help and I eventually lost my job and got into debt to just so I can be تا my sons hospital bed at his time of need - my life basically fell apart and all these debts got me again 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MKandy vs Capital One "WON"


mkandy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5584 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Cant really tell about the date tbh, it seems ok though. What's PPI, payment protection?

 

So, the big question now is, how do i tackle this. Should i

  • Inform the court of what Capital One have said/threatened
  • Write a CCA Non Compliance letter back to Capital One

Or should i be doing something else?

 

I've noticed other people have had an AQ hearing at which point they brought up the CCA Non Compliance, and asked for a proper CCA. So i guess a letter to them first will be best (in the interests of settling out of Court), as i'm expecting an AQ hearing date to be scheduled or am i getting confused? Either way, some definitive steps to take would be beneficial, so i can put my mind as ease, then take it too these sly buggers.

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Capital One's AQ Received today, they kindly forwarded me a copy.

 

Just to quote the closing paragraph "The defendant believes the default has been recorded correctly in accordance with its duties under the credit license as responsible lenders. The refund was made without admission of liability and the defendant hopes the matter is settled"

 

Just to re-iterate, i sent their cheque back, so it's neither settled in the monetary nor default removal terms! How can it be settled!

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking of sending this to Cap One, first thing on Monday, opinions please:

 

Cap Ones

 

Date

 

Court Claim Number: XXXX

 

 

Dear Ms

 

I thank you for your letter of xx December 2007.

 

After further reflection and advise it is now the opinion of myself and my advisers that after studying the documents Capital One supplied for our s78 (1) CCA 1974 request and subject access request under Data Protection Act 1998 that Capital One Bank, do not hold a properly executed enforceable credit agreement with respect to the above account number.

 

78 - Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

 

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

 

(a) the state of the account, and

 

(b) the amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

 

© the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

 

It would seem that this far, Capital One have failed to provide a true copy of the original executed agreement. The application form supplied does not include any of the prescribed terms, which must appear within the signature document. These include details of credit limit, interest payable, details of any power to vary the agreement or debtor’s repayment obligations etc. It is not sufficient for any of these prescribed terms to appear in subsequent, separated or additional documents. Please also note that the relevant terms and conditions which have not been supplied should be those which were in force at the time of the agreement being made, only these terms and conditions would allow any future variation, and bear any reference or link to the any agreement made.

 

You have now exceeded the 12 working days plus one calendar month allowed by statute and Capital One Bank are now in serious default of their obligations under section 78(1) of the CCA (1974). Consequently section (6) of the CCA 1974 now applies:

 

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

I am of the opinion that based on the documents Capital One bank has supplied that there never has been a properly executed credit agreement in the lifetime of the account.

 

Therefore it is also my opinion that under s (85) of the CCA 1974 you could not have supplied a copy of the executed agreement each time the credit card was replaced, therefore Capital One are unable to comply with that section of the act and as such are in default. Consequently you have been in breach of s (85) since 4th April 2002.

 

Consequently section (85) of the CCA 1974 now applies:

 

85 Duty on issue of new credit-tokens

 

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

 

and

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

What I now require.

 

The refund of all interest applied to the account since 4th April 2002, plus the refund all charges made to my account during this time, totalling £392.76. Finally, I request that the default notice served against my credit file inaccurately is removed as soon as possible.

 

My targets to resolve this matter

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to settle this matter out of court, to ensure no further valuable court time is wasted.

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively within this time period, there will be no other alternative but to let the courts decide. I am confident of my position and believe that I will be able to show a Judge that I was never lawfully indebted to you by the amount that is shown on the default register, or at all.

I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

Yours Sincerely,

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Urgent! Need a bit of guidance...

 

1.)Should i send the letter above to Capital one, and hope they respond in a decent way

 

2.)Should i update my POC to include something around CCA

 

3.)Should i do something else?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could mention the CCA part. Have you had a look at dpick's thread in this forum Andy?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could mention the CCA part. Have you had a look at dpick's thread in this forum Andy?

 

Can I ask a question? If the CCA hasnt been followed correctly and only an application form has been signed then are we in a position to say that because Cap 1 acted 'wrongly' ( as per dpicks thread) then they should pay all charges as per schedule 1? Will they pay up in this instance with out resorting to an N1?

 

Baslow

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could mention the CCA part. Have you had a look at dpick's thread in this forum Andy?

 

Yup that's what my letter entails, i've just modified it to suit my case.

 

My biggest concern is how/if i should inform the courts. With my case being structured around Unlawful Penalties causing a therefore inaccurate default, would i also be able to argue that there was non-compliance with my CCA Request also, i would i need to ammend my whole arguement to suit?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically guys, you have no enforcable agreements, so you can ask for all of your charges back, PPI, and as i see it interest. They should deduct the amount borrowed in the first place, that's about it.

 

Andy, if you amend the court paperwork, it will cost £35, and you would need the N244 form. Might be an idea to approach Capital One and ask for it all back, to see what the reaction is.

 

I have an application form too, going back to 1999, so i will be going after PPI and interest. dpick is more up to speed on this with Capital One, so maybe more helpful.

 

Also i found this the other day on their website. I would use this as ammo against them in your claim:

 

On their website under FAQ's it gives you the procedure once you have filled in the form. It says :

 

Do I need to sign a credit agreement?

 

Yes. After you've been accepted, we will send out two copies of the credit agreement to you. You need to read and sign the one with the yellow band at the bottom of the page, and send it back to us. The second is for you to keep.

 

There you go, guilty as charged. . . .

 

Maybe worth copying the page.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers UK

 

 

Just sent a letter to Capital One, utilising the letter dpick made up, hopeful i'll get some kind of useful reply back from them, but what can you do.

 

Now that both of us have completed our AQ questionnaires, will there be an AQ hearing set up by the court? If so would it just be a case of me saying, this is no longer a monetary claim, as i'm going down the CCA route?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day Andy, the law is there and can't be changed over night. They don't have much of a case if they were sloppy in their paperwork all these years. I feel sorry for the people who have been made bankrupt by them, and probably did'nt have an agreement in the first place.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is awful, and i'm glad that people are starting to get back at them. If it wasn't for this place, i'd be screwed for years.

 

So in terms of this case, what happens next if they tell me to get lost?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you amended your POC for the AQ. . ?

 

That will then be for the judge to sort out. I can't see them even turning up.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've submitted the AQ, with the standard blurb in section G around i feel their charges are unlawful, as such they should refund them, plus remove the default since it was made up of unlawful charges, and inaccurately recorded. At this point i hadn't included anything around CCA, this is my worry, that i haven't mentioned anything around the non-compliance of the request.

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK have you got a link to that FAQ? I can't find it under their FAQ's section...Maybe they've had it removed!

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's here about half way down:

 

FAQs About Capital One Credit Cards

 

I have copied the pages and printed them out just in case.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent mate, thanks for that.

 

 

Just the wait for Capital One's reply, if it's not what i want its time for the amendment to the POC. Should i need to do this, what's the process afterwards, will we have to go through AQ again?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't have to go through the whole AQ part again. You use the N244 court form and file it. It will cost £35 to amend, which is not claimable.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Grrrrr. Just recieved notification from the Courts. My claim has been stayed pending the forthcoming test case.

 

What's the next best option? Ask for it to be removed as Credit Cards aren't related to the test case or shall i amend the POC to change it to a CCA related claim?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should contact the court as the test case is for Bank charges, not Credit Card charges. We have seen this quite a few times now. .

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any templated letters that you know of?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a template letter. Just write and say you assume they have made a mistake as this is a credit card claim - point out that the OFT test case only applies to personal current accounts.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need a bit of help filling in the N244 form, i'm amending my POC to include detail around non compliance of CCA, and removal of the stay placed on my claim by the county court.

 

 

Do i need to complete Section A & B?

 

Following the Application for removal of stay guide in the Bank templates library, there is a lot of information to be pasted into section C. Is this still necessary if i'm amending the POC to go for CCA rather than unlawful charges?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are doing a revised PoC you should probbaly include everything there rather than in Part C although you need to put something in part C by way of evidence in support of your application to change your PoC - ie what circumstances, etc have changed that you need to change it. You will need to fill in Parts A and B.

 

Advice is to highlight the changed parts of the PoC in red.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In part A, whats the 'order' im referring to? Sorry not totally up with the court Lingo

 

1.)I intend to apply for an order that:

 

2.)Because

 

 

I need to be certain as to what should appear in here. Part C i can just copy my original POC and make the slight ammendments, then attach a covering letter around stay removal.

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted a letter to the courts in reply to my claim being stayed.

 

Now that i've done this, what would be the likely action if i wish to change my POC, would it be reviewed as it were, or would the stay remain?

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...