Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

please hellp with teslco car insurance dispute


terry1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have car insurence with tesco,

last week i had a acident and my car is a write off, i bought my car for 3200, and tesco have come back with a figure of 2100 , i cannot buy a car for the same milage and condition for 2100-300 excess.l

what can i do.

they are very unhepfull

and time is dragging on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Terry,

 

They won't listen to start off with, you just have to stick to your guns and if you can get evidence of what similar cars are going for that will strenghen your case. You may have to make a formal complaint and ultimately go to the ombudsman, but don't back off and be prepared to take it all the way. Don't accept any payment from them under any circumstances until they make a fair offer.

 

if you can tell us the make and model of the car, its year of registration and mileage that will be useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the car was a mgf n reg 44000 miles, very good condition

they are looking into it, by sending anothelr energer out, who will ring me .

they said that if i cash the check it will not prejuious any further came, l

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a car with such a low mileage it might be worth contacting the MG owners club to see if they can give you a valuation. If you have receipts for any servicing or repairs that you have had done that will also help. Any photos that show its condition prior to the accident will also be helpful.

 

Have you checked on Parkers, as they have a used price guide for older cars?

 

Parker's

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been through this exact situation (with Elephant.co.uk) in May. So I speak with some experience.

 

Basically the FSO recommends that insurance companies should pay out Glasses Guide retail value, minus any excess, in the event of a write off (and that was actually written in the small print of my insurance documentation). Approach a friendly motor dealer and they should tell you what Glasses retail price is for your car. That's what you should be aiming for. Write off to the insurance and tell them that's what you want.

 

If they still refuse to raise their offer, then go onto the Auto Trader website and print off some ads for similar cars. You'll probably find that they're priced around Glasses Guide price anyway - since that's what the trade uses to price cars. Send these off to your insurers, pointing out that that's what it's going to cost to replace, and ask that they increase their offer.

 

If they still refuse, then after their final offer you can then refer the case to the FSO.

 

Never accept the first offer as final settlement (still bank the cheque though). I eventually got a reasonable payout in 3 separate installments. :rolleyes: .

 

Be in no doubt: Insurance companies will try to "Do" you in any way they can. I'm disgusted at the way they try to evade their liabilities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...