Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank charges A&L


adamsdad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5981 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

only joined the forum yesterday mainly because i'm having a few problems with A&L on behalf of my wife.We are at a stage were they have offered a pittance of the amount claimed and having rejected it and threatened them with court action i have just received a letter back saying that is their final offer.So it looks like were going to have to get the ball rolling with court action and thats were we are going to need some help as we ain't got a clue!!

Any help would be greatly appreciated.Cheers

 

Oh,and by the way,does anyone no if you can claim back "Paid item charge" and "Monthly overdraft charge" from theses theives!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi AdamsDad,

 

Welcome to the forum. Yes you can claim back the "Paid item charge" and you can claim back the "Unauthorised overdraft charge" of £25. I am roughly at the same stage as you, having just received a letter making me an offer of about 25% of my claim. I am rufusing it and am going to court stage next. If I can be of any help I will, but there are dozens of really helpful people on this site who are just as sick of the A&L as us. Keep on fighting. Good luck.

 

N£m£sis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi N£m£sis,

thanks for taking the time to reply to me it's much appreciated.I have claimed back all the "paid item charges" and the "unauthorised overdraft charge"(but thanks for reassuring me)but their are many charges of £25.00 for "monthly overdraft charge" and i'm unsure whether they are the legal monthly fees as per the terms and conditions(if only we kept those boring t&c's) of the account which is just your bog standard current account.Any idea????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again AdamsDad,

 

I looked through some of my old statements to see if I had any of these "monthly O/D charges, because I have not claimed for any. Sure enough I spent ten minutes going through them and found 4 straight away. They always came out on or about the 24th of the month, but not every month. I would say that these are default charges and a reclaimable, but it would be nice to get this confirmed so we can claim them prior to court action. So it is nice to talk, you've found me another £100 in 10 mins. Cheers! If I go through all my statements I bet there are a few more. Hopefully someone can clear this up for us. Off to work now speak to you later.

 

N£m£sis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you don't have a clue the first thing to do is vist the step-by-step instuctions - they are very helpful. Follow this link

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

The Waiver is an FSA Conspiracy with the banks against the consumer - Complain to your MP and the FSA about their shameful act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I think most people have claimed the £20 difference between the standard monthly O/D charge of £5 charged if you stayed within your agreed O/D limit and the £25 charged if you went over the agreed limit.

MB

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are in the green section - bank templates library (under FAQ)

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

:confused: Hi All,

I've been so busy with work lately that i haven't been able to chase this up so last week i sent A&L the first request letter which i picked up from the CAG templates asking them to allow it to overide any previous corospondence(i did this because the previous letters i sent were basically self worded because by then i had not been put onto this excellent site)

Well they have written back basically saying that because of the test case some banks have become involved in(A&L not being one of them)they have asked both the Financial Ombudsman Service and the courts not to proceed with any other case they are hearing until the test case is resolved and that if i choose to issue a claim in the county courts they intend to apply for an order to stay my action until resolution of the legal procedings with the Office Of Fair trading.

So what i was wondering was do i just continue with my claim as outlined in the step by stem guide or does this put a different slant on things.

All advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Adams dad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adams dad my advice would be to carry on as the step by step instructions suggest, yes lots of cases are being stayed (frozen) by the courts but i would still carry on, things may change and once it is sorted out you will be way up the ladder instead of being at the bottom. There are plenty of people on here who offer really sound advice and from what ive read on other threads this is the way to go:rolleyes:

Hope this helps

Nicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nicky,

it's a coincidence that you should reply as i have just been reading through your own thread but i had to go out before i reached the end,

i just got upto were you knocked back a couple of grand,

did you manage to get back the full amount in the end?????

 

steve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello All,

can anyone advise me on my claim to date.I took A&L to court using the N1 form at a cost of £120.00 but they did not bother responding to the court within the 14 day period required so i then requested judgement which was granted about 10 days ago but as i haven't heard from A&L i contacted the court to apply for an "enforcement" but was told that the court would not be issuing anymore enforcements untill after the test case and that i should seek legal advice if i wshed.As i dont really want to start paying money out for solicitors if it's going to be a waste of time i was hoping someone might be able to advise.cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The test case issue is only in respect of the legality of the claim and future decisions of judges hearing cases. The fact they didn't respond is taken as an admission of the fact that the charges are unlawful and this was backed up with the judgement you received. Unless the bank is attempting to set aside the judgement, enforcement should be a fairly automatic process unconnected with outside influences

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blueskies,

Thanks for the advice,i've since read on the site that A&L may have asked my local court to automatically "stay" any action against them so i'm going to use the relevant form to ask the court to lift the stay using a letter template that is also on this excellent site.I will keep the thread updated.Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Good News!!

Wrote a letter to the judge asking him to allow me to enforce my claim as i was awarded judgement and he has obliged so i paid the £55.00 charge(which A&L have to pay back to me)yesterday and the bailiffs letter will go out in the next couple of days.Here's to another victory for the man in the street!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello - this is my first day on this forum and this particular thread caught my attention.

 

The sum of money I'm dealing with - £25 - is nothing compared to some of the charges other consumers have had taken off them by the A & L but I thought someone may be interested in my experience.

 

I've had a current account with the A & E for 13 years with an overdraft buffer of £10. I've always stayed within this buffer so have avoided being hit with any "unauthorised overdraft" charges. Then in Nov I checked my account on the phone and found I was £25 down - I phoned up to find out what was going on and was told that a direct debit had taken me beyond my buffer and so I'd been charged £25 and I said that this was impossible. Then I checked my account online and it turned out that, without my knowledge, my reward for 13 years custom was to have my overdraft buffer reduced from £10 to £5 and a direct debit took me 17p over the new reduced buffer so I was charged £25.

 

When I phoned the bank about this I was told bluntly that they're not dealing with any claims for unfair charges until this court case is resolved which could take 12 months. Now I've had a bad few months financially and could do with that £25 that they've taken off me and don't fancy waiting 12 months for it. Am I going to get anywhere if I write to them demanding it back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

In relation to my claim against A&L i thought i had successfully won via the small claims court having been granted the opportunity to enforce via warrant.but i have since received a letter from the court telling me that A&L's legal team have applied to the court to have a hearing on the grounds that they did not receive the original paper work which they had to respond to when i submitted my N1 form and because they also feel the outcome of the test case will put them in strong position to win this claim,this application was accepted by the court.

my problem is that this letter explaining this was delivered two weeks ago to the wrong address and i only received it two days ago and the date set for the hearing is this thursday(03rd jan 08) as i havn't a clue what to do any advice would be greatly appreciated.Adamsdad

user_online.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...