Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • “Not realising it was a no parking zone” doesn’t help you if the timing is correct, as (at least, on Google Maps / View) there is clear signage ('7am to midnight', parked at 15:22) What might be worth pursuing is the "ticket handed to driver" aspect : do you have any view on why they would be  stating that?
    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A Double Check on Some Employment Law Stuff Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No she hasn't seen a solicitor. Although she could no doubt get a free initial consultation, she has been worried about the ongoing cost after reading that legal costs are not recoverable from the other party, and for employment law cases can quickly escalate to thousands of pounds, neither can she get legal aid funding. She has no savings and is trying to get extra hours at her second job to supplement what she has now lost from her main job.

 

There seems to be no angle from which to make a viable discrimination case. The employees are all female - the only way that sex discrimination could be alleged is if she was sacked for refusing to do something which a male employee wasn't expected to do, or if she was being treated in any way differently to a male colleague. Unfortunately there are none.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest weegirl

Why are all the staff female though? The way I view this that it speaks volumes in itself. Workplaces these days are rarely all remale, with the exception of the likes of the Womens Refuges that can legally refuse to employ men.

 

I didn't think I had an angle either until I seen a good solicitor. I was amazed at the information he gave me, it would be worth a shot for her to talk to someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you need to worry about the solicitor yet.

 

It appears that the MD has taken advice and that the person she will be meeting will be acting as the agent of the company rather than an independent arbitrator. As such this is the appeal section of the internal process rather than any escalation beyond that.

 

This is likely to be a very unpleasant meeting - I think it is unlikely that she will get much chance to respond to any of the points, however false, and probably would not be listened to even if she did. However what she should get is some written evidence against the MD, it would be great if she could come away with a some written, signed statement that is demonstrably false.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input. I have suggested that she must attend the appeal and go prepared with comprehensive notes, responding with "that is not true" or "no that is not what I said, I said this" and remain as calm as possible. She is entitled to copies of the statements made in the company's defence, and she has notes which she made at, and immediately after the original disciplinary hearing. She may even take a dictaphone if I can persuade her and particularly if she cannot find the best possible person to accompany her.

 

As I see it this is just a part of the process, and must be completed in order to move forwards, irrespective of the outcome.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On no account should she back down and she should not see the consulatant unaccommpanied by a rep. She neeeds to mention to the rep representing her about the false statements. This guy is digging his own grave and if the false statements come to light, he would end up getting a severe fine plus if he had to fire any other staff, they could take him to the cleaners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not looking good this evening as she has been to CAB (who told her that she can be accompanied by anybody, even somebody from outside work) and has now had a falling out with her best mate (the Supervisor) over why she has signed a witness statement which she knew to be false.

 

Unless something changes quickly this won't even get to the appeal hearing let alone any further. Her notification of the hearing stated that she must inform the company tomorrow that the date of next Thursday is acceptable :(

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Gertie100

Whilst we all appreciate that this person is obviously completely ignorant of the law, and feels he can treat his employees any which way he likes...unless you have the backing of other employees it will always be his word against hers...

I don't mean to be cycnical or pessimistic but I have worked in companies like this before. Completely private company, run by the person who owns it, bullying tactics, making employees feel like he is doing them a favour by paying them (usually a pittance) each month.

Ultimately in the world of the big boys, with unions, good procedures, a good name in the industry, there is always a chance that you can take them on and win - or at least walk away with a shred of dignity.

 

However in a case like this? He has probably threatened all his staff with the sack if they don't sign the false statements, all women (as said before why is that??), possibly struggling financially (sounds like a generalisation, but I hope you know what I mean!), they will be protecting themselves as any of us would.

I'm not saying don't fight - after all what has she got to lose? (Again we back to the dignity thing)

 

Sorry to say it, but she's probably better off out of it as I was...:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it not possible for you to accompany her? Although you cannot answer thir questions directly, you can use delaying tactics. Every time they ask her a question, she refers to you which she is perfectly entitled to do. You can then advise "no comment", "need to take it into consideration" etc that way giving no definite answer but stay within the boundaries of offers if you can understand what i mean.

What they are trying to do is avoid it going to a tribunal which they know they will lose. Has she advised her friend that in the event her friend admits that she had to sign the statement under duress, her friend will then have a job there for life as there is no ways the boss could fire her friend without risking another tribunal as her friend could then claim harrasment due to being truthful etc.

She can go online and join the GMB at Home or alternatively contact their offices at 020 8397 8881 and explain what has happen and ask for advice.

I repeat on no account should she go in front of these people without someone else as they will rip her to shreds as it will be two against one and their word against hers.

Although I am no banana on employment law, what her former boss has done is totally out of order as he never followed procedure and is now trying to cover up by usoing this employment consultant.

As an aside, when i lived in South Africa every time I read about strikes in Britain and because I did not know any better, I used to think what a bunch of a***holes till I came here to work in 1993. Your employment conditions were something out of the middle ages. The first place I worked in, in winter the temperature barely got abve 10 degrees centigrade. Also the way staff were treated was beyond belief. I then realised that a lot of people were going on strike for very genuine reasons and as a result I joined the GMB and have taken on my present company twice and on both occasions won and got what was rightfully ours and it was not compensation. Got back pay, withheld bonuses and leave increased. I probably would not have achieved this without the help of a union and my present company is one of the better companies to work for in the area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at the Greater Manchester Employment Rights Service.

 

They have downloadable factsheets for Unfair Dismissal, etc. Their

telephone advise is second to none but you have to live in the area to qualify.

Keep in constant touch with ACAS, let them guide you through every step.

 

 

Greater Manchester Pay & Employment Rights Advice Service -> Advice Factsheets -> Your Rights at Work ->

 

There is also a section on employment legislation

 

Greater Manchester Pay & Employment Rights Advice Service -> Research -> Employment Legislation ->

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is really heartening to see so many people care about someone that is the victim of bad employment practices. I think many of us have been down this route and feel strongly for the victim and would like to see justice done

Considering the number of employment issues raised on this site, I would not be surprised if the mods opened an employment forum. how about it mods? Perhaps then we can get some union reps to offer some broad advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...