Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @jk2054 retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free so I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out.   Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

jmn v A&L


jmn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6135 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After taking guidance from Mimi, I will attempt to summarise my claim so far.

 

It all started when my youngest Son was taken ill. In short - I had to give up my job for a while and things just esculated from there really.

I spoke to the Cust Srv Mgr at A&L head office and she said "Well it was your decision to give up your job and so you should cut back on spending. You have a commitment to you mortage and any other DD/SO that you have on your acct" Lovely lady!

I then made an appt to see an advisor at my local branch and she pretty much said the same. I sobbed in front of her and I vowed I would never let them see be crumble again. So now its payback time!

 

27/2/07 - SAR sent

6/4/07 - Statements rec'd

30/4/07 - Approach for re-claim of £2222.12 (inc int.) attached Charges sheet

5/5/07 - A&L reply with standard "charges applied correctly"

7/5/07 - Reminder letter for repayment sent with charges sheet.

13/5/07 - Rec'd "we are looking into it" letter

29/5/07 - LBA sent

1/6/07 - Partial refund offered - £659.50

6/6/07 - MCO completed

9/6/07 - Notice of Issue to A&L

14/6/07 - Ack of Svc & intention to defend from Wraggies

15/6/07 - 2nd partial refund offered - cheque: 779.50 (659.50 + 120.00 court cost)

15/6/07 - Refusal letter & returned chq sent back

19/6/07 - Ack of Svc from N'hampton, A&L to defend

19/6/07 - A&L defence rec'd from Wraggies

23/6/07 - Particulars of claim & schedule of charges sent to Court & Wraggies

2/7/07 - Called MCO to chase up. They have backlog but transfered to Leicester CC.

3/7/07 - Rec'd Notice of transfer to LCC. AQ dispensed with.

3/7/07 - Letter to Wraggies for quick settlement. Charges enc.

3/7/07 - Draft order for directions & covering letter sent to LCC

5/7/07 - THIRD partial offer arrived from Wraggies - £910.25 + £120

 

That's less than half of my original claim, without the interest!

 

Have not called the court yet regarding AQ fee, cos' I read somewhere that it's best to give them 7-10 days after receiving Notice of transfer - Is this right?

 

And as for the Bundle/State of Evi/State of truth etc, etc, Where on earth do I start............and when?

 

Eternally grateful

Jmn

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of questions for anyone out there.

 

1) Could anyone please tell me if my husband would have to attend court as the acct is in joint names but I was the one who started the process?

 

2) Also, something that has just sprung to mind - we were married 12 weeks ago but the acct still has my maiden name on it. I never changed it as I do not use it any more really and it never accured to me until just!

 

Though all the correspondance I have been sending is in my married name with 'nee' by the side. Both Wraggies and the court have been addressing their correspondance in my married name. So can I assume that this is OK?

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the best in your claim. MimiJane has a really well thought out Court bundle with index. I asked her to email it to me and I have been doing it on and off for about three weeks. If you PM her I'm sure that she will share it with you.

 

This is the witness statement I shall be using after a bit of editing .......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester/102862-court-date-help-needed.html

 

 

I have sent you a PM (private message) as well :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jmn,

 

Good to se you have your own thead nowicon7.gif

 

As you're probably not too far off getting a set of a directions and a court date, I'll send you a few details by email.

 

Mimi x

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Mimi, I have rec'd the details you sent and will read through them.

 

Also thanks to bsia666, rec'd your info too.

 

You really are a great bunch of peeps to give up your valuable time to help others.

Hopefully once I a bit more knowledgeable, I will be able to help other CAG viewers too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to mention that I was succesful in claiming my MEAF (mortgage exit fee) back for A&L. Overpaid me by £1.86p aswell, which I thought was very generous of them!

 

When we took our mortgage out in 1992 it stated £14.50 ish and when we moved it last year they charged us £295!

 

So one victory against them already - hope the bank charges will be another one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you jmnicon7.gif I'm sure there'll be another victory on the way, though there might be a way to go yet. I'm sure you'll get there in the end.icon12.gif

 

Mimi x

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

After taking guidance from Mimi, I will attempt to summarise my claim so far.

 

It all started when my youngest Son was taken ill. In short - I had to give up my job for a while and things just esculated from there really.

I spoke to the Cust Srv Mgr at A&L head office and she said "Well it was your decision to give up your job and so you should cut back on spending. You have a commitment to you mortage and any other DD/SO that you have on your acct" Lovely lady!

I then made an appt to see an advisor at my local branch and she pretty much said the same. I sobbed in front of her and I vowed I would never let them see be crumble again. So now its payback time!

 

27/2/07 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

6/4/07 - Statements rec'd

30/4/07 - Approach for re-claim of £2222.12 (inc int.) attached Charges sheet

5/5/07 - A&L reply with standard "charges applied correctly"

7/5/07 - Reminder letter for repayment sent with charges sheet.

13/5/07 - Rec'd "we are looking into it" letter

29/5/07 - LBA sent

1/6/07 - Partial refund offered - £659.50

6/6/07 - MCO completed

9/6/07 - Notice of Issue to A&L

14/6/07 - Ack of Svc & intention to defend from Wraggies

15/6/07 - 2nd partial refund offered - cheque: 779.50 (659.50 + 120.00 court cost)

15/6/07 - Refusal letter & returned chq sent back

19/6/07 - Ack of Svc from N'hampton, A&L to defend

19/6/07 - A&L defence rec'd from Wraggies

23/6/07 - Particulars of claim & schedule of charges sent to Court & Wraggies

2/7/07 - Called MCO to chase up. They have backlog but transfered to Leicester CC.

3/7/07 - Rec'd Notice of transfer to LCC. AQ dispensed with.

3/7/07 - Letter to Wraggies for quick settlement. Charges enc.

3/7/07 - Draft order for directions & covering letter sent to LCC

5/7/07 - THIRD partial offer arrived from Wraggies - £910.25 + £120

 

That's less than half of my original claim, without the interest!

 

Have not called the court yet regarding AQ fee, cos' I read somewhere that it's best to give them 7-10 days after receiving Notice of transfer - Is this right?

 

And as for the Bundle/State of Evi/State of truth etc, etc, Where on earth do I start............and when?

 

Eternally grateful

Jmn

Hi Jmn

I too am at Leicester county court and from what i can work out i think it often depends on the amount of the claim as to wether an allocations questionnaire is sent out. My claim is for £5000.+ and when i asked regarding the AQ i was told that for that amount i probably would have to fill one out (which i have and sent off). So maybe you wont have to!

Good luck with it:)

Nicky:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

It used to be the case that, if you're claiming under £1,500, you didn't have to fill an AQ; anything over this amount and you did have to.

 

I'm not sure if that's the case anymore so, if the court states it may have been dispensed with, always wise to give them a call and ask if one will be sent out to you and/if an AQ fee is payable. I didn't have to fill one out, but did have to pay the fee within 14 days.

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Mimi,

Have received AQ this morning. Scanned through it quickly this morning but was running late so didn't get a good read of it and unfortunately, forgot to bring it to work.

The wording struck me as being differant to what other people had put in their posts.

Something about 'the time is up for all parties to enter their defence and so the AQ has to be return and paid for by July 23rd'.

 

I didn't need to return a defence when I received A&L's did I??

 

Really wished I brought it with me know - it's going to play on my mind all day now.

Do you recognise the wording? (as vague as it is)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jmn

I too am at Leicester county court and from what i can work out i think it often depends on the amount of the claim as to wether an allocations questionnaire is sent out. My claim is for £5000.+ and when i asked regarding the AQ i was told that for that amount i probably would have to fill one out (which i have and sent off). So maybe you wont have to!

Good luck with it:)

Nicky:p

Hi Nicky,

Yes I have too complete one also. Well out of my comfort zone!

To be returned by 23rd July but will have to complete and return a lot sooner as I'm going to Swansea on the 19th til 21st for my eldest Son's graduation then off to London with work 22nd to 23rd!

 

Going to be so busy, I could really do without the mad rush!

 

But I have the guide notes and previous CAG's have commented on how simple it is to complete.

 

Keep you posted.

Jmn

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of questions for anyone out there.

 

1) Could anyone please tell me if my husband would have to attend court as the acct is in joint names but I was the one who started the process?

 

2) Also, something that has just sprung to mind - we were married 12 weeks ago but the acct still has my maiden name on it. I never changed it as I do not use it any more really and it never accured to me until just!

 

Though all the correspondance I have been sending is in my married name with 'nee' by the side. Both Wraggies and the court have been addressing their correspondance in my married name. So can I assume that this is OK?

 

Thank you in advance

Is there anyone out there who could ansr my two questions for me please?

 

Jmn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning, I see you are busy working;) ..........who is the claimant ? is it you or hubby?

Well, I suppose I am as I started the claim - though the paperwork from Wragges, A&L and the Court addresses us both e.g

 

**** & ****

v

Alliance & Leicester

 

Though I have only ever signed the letters from myself, but I wondered if it is because it is a joint acct?

 

Hope you can help

Jmn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mimi,

I remembered to bring AQ to work with me today. This is the wording in the letter that came with the AQ:

 

" You have already been sent a copy of a defence received from the defendants in this claim. The time for all the defendants to file their defences has now elapsed and I am enclosing an AQ for you to complete. No further defences have been received.

You must complete the AQ on or before 23 July 2007 and return it to the court office ...........

 

A fee of £100.00 is payable by the claimant on the filing of their AQ"

 

I can't recall any body else detailing this type of wording as I've been reading thru the post's. Have I done something wrong?

 

Jmn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mimi,

I remembered to bring AQ to work with me today. This is the wording in the letter that came with the AQ:

 

" You have already been sent a copy of a defence received from the defendants in this claim. The time for all the defendants to file their defences has now elapsed and I am enclosing an AQ for you to complete. No further defences have been received.

You must complete the AQ on or before 23 July 2007 and return it to the court office ...........

 

A fee of £100.00 is payable by the claimant on the filing of their AQ"

 

I can't recall any body else detailing this type of wording as I've been reading thru the post's. Have I done something wrong?

 

Jmn

 

I can't help here I'm afraid ... didn't have to complete one myself. Hopefully someone else will come along.

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't help here I'm afraid ... didn't have to complete one myself. Hopefully someone else will come along.

Hi Mimi, not rec'd any advice regarding my letter as yet. Is there somewhere else I could post it where people would see it?

 

Also, rec'd letter from Wragge today, in response to my first nudge letter saying:

"Your offer to accept the sum of £** in settlement of your claim is not acceptable to our client. Any settlement that our client may wish to make with you must include your acceptance of our client's standard t&c previously notified to you together with a confidentiality clause. We are not in a position to make any offers of settlement to you unless you agree to the t&c of your bank acct"

 

Contact given as Susan Land for Wragge & Co

 

Should I respond to this, and if so what should I write?

 

Thank you

Jmn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the wording on your request for an AQ, I can't see you've done anything wrong ... it my view it's just stating that all defences (i.e. the one due from the defendant) have been received, though I can't comment on whether or not this is "standard" ... I'm no expert I'm afraid:rolleyes:

As you obviously have to complete one though, if you look in the A-Z link I sent you in my email, there's a guide to filling it in.

 

Normally Wragge don't bother replying to nudge letters as far as I'm aware (they certainly didn't to mine:rolleyes:), unless they decide to offer an amount to settle, which will usually be a fraction of what you're claiming, so I've never seen this letter before .... you're honoured:rolleyes:

 

I'm sure there's a second nudge letter somewhere that you can send, say, in a couple of weeks if you want to. This is probably also in the A-Z if you take a look. Personally I only sent the first one, as they didn't respond. It's up to you whether you decide to send another or not. Some think it's a good idea, others see it as making you look a little weak and desperate.

 

Hope this helps a littleicon7.gif

 

Mimi

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the wording on your request for an AQ, I can't see you've done anything wrong ... it my view it's just stating that all defences (i.e. the one due from the defendant) have been received, though I can't comment on whether or not this is "standard" ... I'm no expert I'm afraid:rolleyes:

As you obviously have to complete one though, if you look in the A-Z link I sent you in my email, there's a guide to filling it in.

 

Normally Wragge don't bother replying to nudge letters as far as I'm aware (they certainly didn't to mine:rolleyes:), unless they decide to offer an amount to settle, which will usually be a fraction of what you're claiming, so I've never seen this letter before .... you're honoured:rolleyes:

 

I'm sure there's a second nudge letter somewhere that you can send, say, in a couple of weeks if you want to. This is probably also in the A-Z if you take a look. Personally I only sent the first one, as they didn't respond. It's up to you whether you decide to send another or not. Some think it's a good idea, others see it as making you look a little weak and desperate.

 

Hope this helps a littleicon7.gif

 

Mimi

Thanks Mimi,

I have the AQ guide notes and the 2nd nudge - see, you are a good teacher. I do everything you say!

 

Though I'm not sure I feel honoured by their response to my 1st nudge:eek: not exactly what I wanted to hear.

 

I think some of the letters must pass in the 'black hole', that is the Royal Mail! I sent my 1st nudge on 3rd July and rec'd offer of a pitiful amount by 5th July, so I thought this was in response to my nudge, but now, after receiving this one today, I'm not so sure which one is in response to which letter!

 

Crikey it must be pandamonium in Wraggies office!!:D Oh too be a big fly on their wall

Link to post
Share on other sites

allocation questionaire ???????

 

I dont have an AQ but wondered if post 4 might help?

URGENT PLEASE: Full Settlement Confidentiality Clause

 

also post by michael browne on conf clause

 

Also see the nudge section I added to a reject letter on my thread.

 

I have decided thats the only one I am going to do unless things change.

 

they have not appeared in court yet and are paying others in full at the moment- and after the time spent researching etc I feel like we have all earned this now:)

 

jansus

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

allocation questionaire ???????

 

I dont have an AQ but wondered if post 4 might help?

URGENT PLEASE: Full Settlement Confidentiality Clause

 

also post by michael browne on conf clause

 

Also see the nudge section I added to a reject letter on my thread.

 

I have decided thats the only one I am going to do unless things change.

 

they have not appeared in court yet and are paying others in full at the moment- and after the time spent researching etc I feel like we have all earned this now:)

 

jansus

Thanks

I think I've done it. Almost complete, just need to do copies for Wragge.

 

Your all amazingly patient with the newcomers. So grateful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jmn it doesnt matter if you complete the AQ early as they will not look at it until after the date its due even if wragges have completed and sent in theirs. Then your looking at another 3-4 weeks until the judge has looked at it and decided which route to take and theres even a back log in the office so add another weeks on to that! at least that is what they told me at the court. So i think its a case of settle down we are in for a long wait!! Good luck with every thing i ll keep watching this space.

Nicky

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received this letter from Wragge, I think it is in response to my first nudge letter. It says:

 

"Your offer to accept the sum of £** in settlement of your claim is not acceptable to our client. Any settlement that our client may wish to make with you must include your acceptance of our client's standard t&c previously notified to you together with a confidentiality clause. We are not in a position to make any offers of settlement to you unless you agree to the t&c of your bank acct"

 

Contact given as Susan Land for Wragge & Co

 

I haven't heard of anyone else getting a letter like this. I don't really understand the content or whether it needs a response from me. Do I write back? If so what should I write?

 

Also, funny how they say 'they are not in a position to make any offers', when I received one from them just day's before this letter arrived, which, as yet I have not responded to. Do I need to write to them rejecting it. They gave me 28 day's.

 

 

Thank you in advance for any help anyone can give me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen this letter very recently which someone else has received ... obviously "standard", particularly as they haven't referred to their other offer:rolleyes: I didn't get any replies to my nudge letters.

 

If you look in the "A to Z" thread here :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

I'm sure you'll find a suggested replyicon7.gif

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha susan land - that is who I am dealing with !

 

I combined a reject letter and a nudge letter together - see my thread - so no doubt I will be getting a similar letter soon:cool:

 

jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...