Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mike vs Natwest!


Mikedav
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I’m new! I had an incident with Natwest I’d like to share and I’d like to know if I have any comeback?

 

In 2004 I opened a second current account. I bank with HSBC, but the second account was with Natwest. Long story short, I wasn’t using it and decided to close it.

 

I went into a branch to pay off the £20 I was overdrawn and close the account. The manager told me ‘it will cost £45 to close this account’. I said ‘Ill leave it dormant then’, and he said ‘that’s my choice’. So I did. He also kept my debit card?

 

That was in mid 2004. In late 2005, I received a letter from a collection agency: I owe Natwest £416.42. I ignored it, contacted Natwest directly and asked what the hell was this as I pay EVERYTHING on time EVERY time!

 

I have moved around a lot and they claim not to have been able to reach me, but I have a LARGE Natwest business loan and a Natwest Master Card, so its not like I did it maliciously (although they are separate entities). I asked for statements, which they sent (not all mind you, only half of them). It turns out, after I left the branch the account went £45 overdrawn again (those ‘charges’) and ever since, Natwest had been adding £20 a month!

 

I wrote a steaming letter, offered £100 as full and final settlement goodwill gesture and demanded they remove the default they had put on my name. Their reply basically said I was due to pay those charges, but they cashed my cheque and I’ve heard nothing since.

 

It seems I might not have had to pay anything at all, but any advice or guidance on what I could do here? Or have I shot myself in the foot my ‘settling’?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure you did settled. You settled on the condition that the default would be removed and the debt written off. I assume this hasn't happened.

 

The debt was £416.42 made up of credit card charges.

 

You paid £100 so you have £316.42 as an unsettled debt on the credit reference file.

 

Just file a claim for i) 316.42 to be written off ii) £100 back, and iii) a removal of the default entry.

 

You have lots of accounts with natwest and might have been charged illegal fees in your other dealings with them. Do a DPA and find out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the letter they sent me as a reply to my complaint basically said:

 

A) You DO owe us this money

B) But we will remove the default

 

I replied with the cheque saying 'here's £100, if you cash it, I will take that as full and final settlement and that tyou have removed the default.' I have not checked my credit record so I don't know if they have or not, but they did cash it.

 

How do I get a record of any dealings I personally have had with Natwest as a whole? Is that a 'DPA'? Ive moved alot so how do they know its me, do I simply put all my addresses? And who should I write to? Thanks for the prompt response!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, one thing at the time.

 

First, you need to read the FAQs and step by step and read around the forum especially the natwest one, as they all function slightly differently, and you need to get a feel for the NWB methodology...

 

A Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act for a set fee of £10 will get you your past statements. In your case, is that all you need? If not, you might need to tweak the template letter to target specifically what you're after.

You need to give them your account number, full name, DOB, last address registered to account. But tbh, it doesn't look like they'll have problems tracing you.

 

You need to write to the collection agency stating that you dispute part or totality of the debt, there's a template in the Library for that too.

 

Once you know how much the bstrds have stung you for, go for it. In your case, should be fairly easy, it seems pretty much the totality of the debt is composed of charges, so that once it's paid back you should be totally in the clear.

 

But first, read read read around.

 

Keep us posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...