Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Similar to what you've said here, just get drafting up based on what's already been sent. The mentions of the CRA2015 will be key. post your draft up here and we can help tweak.
    • Yes, well done. If you have a look at post 9 of dbuk2000's thread there are links to other cases featured on the Parking Prankster's site  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466177-ukpc-2x-windscreen-pncs-claimform-forgot-permit-appealed-res-parking-my-own-space-east-croft-house-86-northolt-road-south-harrow-ha2-0es-claim-dismissed/#comments Also have a read of dbuk2000's Witness Statement.  
    • PDF's now merged above... Plus extra redaction!
    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court Date 28th June Leeds, please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6150 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Just a quick hello and to say after a long wait, I too am in Leeds on the 28th against Lloyds :)

 

I have copied the CMI sheet, however, I am a little confused regarding the costs Q35 + 36, should I just copy

 

Q35 £9.25, 25 hours research + prep

 

Q36 £9.25 30 hours research + prep.

 

I do believe I have spent this time in research etc,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jade,

 

You are supposed to put down your actual costs, ie the time that you have actually spent, providing you have not wasted a lot of unreasonable time.

I assume you have read post 15 on the Case Management information Sheet thread including the notes against the items on the example CMI sheet and separate notes near the bottom of that post. click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-896372.html

Have you also looked at post 19? click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-915078.html

I appreciate it is difficult to put an exact actual time down if you are back-tracking and have not kept records. If you feel that you can comfortably justify the 25 hours for item 35, then no problem in using that. Don't worry about the accuracy of item 36, it hasn't happened yet and is therefore an approximate estimate.

 

Are you happy with this answer?

 

As a matter of interest, how many cases are listed for the 28th June on the papers that you have been sent and what was the date of the Court's letter to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

I am number 222 on the list of claimants for Leeds. I received the letter 14 May it is dated the 10th May. Funnily enough, I rang the court on the 10th and they told me I had no chance of the 28th as they had such a back log, they told me it would be an August date. Lucky me...

 

Jade,

 

You are supposed to put down your actual costs, ie the time that you have actually spent, providing you have not wasted a lot of unreasonable time.

I assume you have read post 15 on the Case Management information Sheet thread including the notes against the items on the example CMI sheet and separate notes near the bottom of that post. click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-896372.html

Have you also looked at post 19? click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-915078.html

I appreciate it is difficult to put an exact actual time down if you are back-tracking and have not kept records. If you feel that you can comfortably justify the 25 hours for item 35, then no problem in using that. Don't worry about the accuracy of item 36, it hasn't happened yet and is therefore an approximate estimate.

 

Are you happy with this answer?

 

As a matter of interest, how many cases are listed for the 28th June on the papers that you have been sent and what was the date of the Court's letter to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys & girls

 

do we know the outcome of thurs/fri hearings at Leeds Mercantil or banks settling beforehand ??

 

i received my letter 1st week i june saying my case had been transferred to Leeds Mercantile so i guess my date is likely to be 29th August as well as i havn't heard a thing back sine the above mentioned letter.

 

at least it gives me 2 months to prepare.

 

regards

 

stl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...