Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

40 days & No Response, Also!


Deedub
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

you just put the type of charge in the 1st column amount in the next then the date in the 3rd .... you must use the format of the examples ... the next 2 columns work themselves out for you

as you click on each box whatever is in them is overwritten by what you type in

 

When you print it out it just prints the document on however many pages it needs to complete the spread sheet

 

Hope that helps

saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Update.

 

I've managed to sort out the spreadsheet issue, I've hidden the interest column & have sent it together with your 2nd letter, Recorded Del.

 

What I did also, as you said not to mention the interest, is to delete those lines in your letter which refers to the interest. So I have said that I am claiming the sum for the bank charges only. Is that correct? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dont Give Up Deedub - They Will Pay up!!

MANY THANKS,

BLUE.

Barclays:

Data Protection letter sent 22/11/06

Prelim approach letter sent £1720.00 22/12/06

Bank offers me £1000.00 to settle 20/01/07

LBA sent 23/01/07

New charges added

MCOL filed £1780 + £310.26 + £120.00 = £2210.26 09/02/07

Court Date Walsall County Court: 17/07/2007

Barclays Case Settled and *WON* before court

Halifax:

Data Protection letter sent 28/11/06

Prelim approach letter sent £1325.00 08/02/07

Halifax Case Settled and *WON* before Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, am just editing the LBA letter & wanted to make sure that I should edit out the interest part & not include it in my charges sum. Also, when you say 'date of first letter' I think you must mean 2nd letter. Is that right?

 

Thanks again, :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another quickie. If I proceed with the court action would Barclays ask me to pay back my overdraft? I ask as I wouldn't have the funds to do this. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they wont, and they cant take action against you for taking action against them, i.e account closure or withdrawing O/D facilities.

Although it does say in the terms and conditions that the bank can withdraw the overdraft at any time, if they were to do this while you are in dispute with them it would look like an act of retaliation.

 

They would like you to use the repayment to clear the debt, and if you can it would be advisable but it can not be an order,

repayment of charges + interest etc are settled on your terms NOT theirs.

If you want it paid to another bank account that is you choice.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, thank you very much for clearing that up, I'll post the letter tomorrow.:)

BTW, if I used my claim money to clear up my overdraft I'd still be in debt to them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi folks, have received a letter today from Barclays informing me of the OFT case & that if I issued a claim via a court then they would order a stay. The letter was quite friendly actually. I know you said to continue to issue a claim, shall I still & would I still have to make an appearence at court, or would I be notified of a stay from the court via a letter?:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is to say that the Court will allow them to stay the case OR that the judge cant be persuaded to lift the stay ?

 

The thing with continuing on to court is that even if B's get a stay then atleast your in the system PLUS its actually getting the interest :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys, well, I've been a bit held up & am not sure where to look to proceed. I've earmarked the New POC for N1 Barclays. I understand I have to make 3 copies of this but, what else do I do please? Should I be looking at a topic somewhere? Have got a bit lost I'm afraid.:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...