Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MarkinLondon vs Lloyds TSB


MarkinLondon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks

 

Here's a quick update on where I'm at with my claims. (There's a couple of queries at the end so please don't hang up before you've got there...!!)

 

I've got 2 Lloyds accounts - let's call them a/c 1 and a/c 2, as that's what they're called.

 

A/c 1 - I'm claiming @ three thousand

 

A/c 2 - I'm claiming @ eighteen hundred

 

(Interest included on both)

 

I started on Martin Lewis's site - then followed his link here and have been lurking ever since making use of the fantastic resources for which I'm etenrally grateful.

 

Both claims have followed a similar pattern: -

 

1) I wrote to LTSB enclosing copy downloaded statements, interest claculator and a request for refund.

2) They reply with an extraordinary letter which totally misses the point.

3) I give them another 14 days

4) They ignore me

5) I open parachute account with A&L

6) I claim online

7) They acknowledge the day before the deadline (curses!!)

8) They then submit defence the day before the 28 day deadline

 

A/c 1 is at stage 8. A/c 2 is at stage 7.

 

I've now had a letter from Northampton which says case has been referred to Bromley (my local court). Letter also says: -

 

'The filing of an allocation questionnaure be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise'

 

It then says I've got 14 days to have this Order set aside. No mention of submitting my bundle or anything else - no court date or anything.

 

Question One then - what should I do?

 

Question 2 - It's a joint account with my wife - do both of us need to attend any court hearing?

 

Question 3 - Are downloaded statements from the LTSB website acceptable in court?

 

That's it - thanks for listening, and thanks in advance for any suggestions!

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark

This link should help with the AQ:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80091-your-court-dispensing-allocation.html?highlight=dispensed+AQ

 

I think that only one of you would need to attend Court, but I am not 100% on that sorry.

 

Downloaded statements are fine.

 

Good luck, keep us posted on what happens.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Barty.

 

Next question - where people of mentioned enclosing a schedule of charges, should I just get the most recent from LTSB - or is there an archive somewhere of all the appropriate ones?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The schedule of charges is actually a list that you compile yourself of all your charges, have a look at this link to help you:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

Barty:)

 

 

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi mark,

No real help i'm afraid, i'm pretty much at the same point in the proceedings, although i'm still awaiting a letter from any court.

I thought i'd "cheer" everyone up by telling you that my mate started this process around about the same time as me (april ish) but with halifax. Today, 3 weeks into the '28 days to make a defence' stage, he's received a letter stating all the money owed, interest and the court fees (approx £4000!!!) will be paid into his account in five working days.

I've been with lloyds all my working life (19 years) and all i'm claiming is £180 plus interest, (total £240 ish) and they're prepared to drag me all through this!!

No matter what happens with regards to my claim, I will be severing all ties with Lloyds tsb.

neil.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...