Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

somefriendly v halifax -battle starts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello -update time -got a letter saying sorry but we arean't giving you your money back, as expected so its lba next .

In the step by step instruction it says you still wait 14 days after one of these letters before an lba -does anyone know why as after all they have replied now and surely i can move onto the next step. Has anyone out there gone ahead before the next 14 day deadline?

 

Yes i know i'm impatient !!!!! but i have other virtues -honest:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

hi -thanks mizz/tilly for that -i do appreciate you help and support.

 

Question. in my Lba i obviously add on the charges (i like to think of them as savings now) i have had since my prelim letter but do i have to stick to this figure when i money claim in a couple of weeks or can i add more if i get any more subsequent charges -

 

Tilly -did you splash out on that new car with your 'savings'

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can keep adding any more charges to your claim up till you file it at court.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well its all up in the air now isn't it !! september mountain biking in a california aint going to happen now-damm!! wonder how long this test case will take -bet they give the banks £12-00 for all fee like credit cards! -so that will be 12 of all charges and possibly re-submitting of all action????????????

Oh well i shall continue my action when the lba is up -about the 4th of august. I have been reading that the good money is on all action being stayed but you never know.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all -got a letter today from the Halifax saying that there was little point continuing action against them oft test case blah blah blah.. I am still going to file and i expect a stay but i have been reading up a bit about the waiver given by the fsa and oft and as far as i can make out, if your in financial trouble the waiver does not count. Now unfortunately i reckon i fit that part of the waiver -any views on this? Should i put something in my n1 to try and preempt a stay? I have read on other threads that you can sort of politely 'remind' judges of points of law just in case they 'forgotten' them

 

Any ideas on how to proceed ?????????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks tilly -(angel tilly) been reading up and some courts seem to be carring on as normal and if everyone keeps claiming it will cost the bnaks loads just to try and stay everyones claim so i can see that large smirk across they faces after the oft anouncement turning to a frown soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any particular reason you are expecting a stay?

 

Most courts are still paying out, you could alway phone your court on monday to find out.

 

I cant see any reason not to continue with your claim.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if it did, there is plenty of advice on what to do if you need it.;)

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all, i know i have slowed down a bit, i have been reading the new particulars of claim on here. It seems very long -is that ok? Also my claim is exculsivly for charges for unpaid dd etc with no overdraft charges etc. So should i put the whole new poc on mine or try to amend it to reflect just bank charges .

Also I could not seem to get my charges all on one spreadsheet, so is it ok to have one with xx amount and another with xx amount and just say the two list add up to xxx etc. It now also says on here somewhere that not to use mcol. Can you still use the claim form (pdf file) print it of and then take it to the court??

Thanks for the help.

 

PS..theres a list of MP's written to about the cosy and unfair way the fsa, oft and banks have got into bed and decided to issue the wavier. Please give it a go!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/108984-list-all-mps-written.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all, i know i have slowed down a bit, i have been reading the new particulars of claim on here. It seems very long -is that ok? Also my claim is exculsivly for charges for unpaid dd etc with no overdraft charges etc. So should i put the whole new poc on mine or try to amend it to reflect just bank charges .

Also I could not seem to get my charges all on one spreadsheet, so is it ok to have one with xx amount and another with xx amount and just say the two list add up to xxx etc. It now also says on here somewhere that not to use mcol. Can you still use the claim form (pdf file) print it of and then take it to the court??

Thanks for the help.

 

PS..theres a list of MP's written to about the cosy and unfair way the fsa, oft and banks have got into bed and decided to issue the wavier. Please give it a go!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/108984-list-all-mps-written.html

 

 

Yeah, I was in same situ and used the template, but am saving bit about only claiming for unfair charges and unauthorized overdraft has no relevance to test case for application for removal of stay as my local court is applying blanket stays. Somebody prob be along soon with more (better ) advice.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/107696-courts-carrying.html

 

take a look here, may help you some.

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...