Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

littlep vs Lloyds - pre trial review


littlep
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6219 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Littlep V Lloyds (claiming on behalf of my wife).
  • Claiming charges of £320 (not inc interest or court fee) from Sept 2003 thru to Feb 2005.
  • 1st Letter sent 28th Feb detailing the unfair bank charges – did not get a response.
  • 2nd letter - LBA sent 15th Mar with schedule of charges showing date and amount - received standard letter from Lloyds saying ‘No’ to refund.
  • Filled in Claim form on MCOL (using templates from MSE website, and I'm concerned the info I have given is not enough)
  • Recieved letter saying transfer of court proceedings to Cambridge, dispensing with AQ.
  • Phoned court to put in an amendment to the claim as I wasn't happy with what info I had given them. Lady from the court said don't bother unless I am asked to do so, and I can always give info at the hearing.
  • Pre Trial review court date 30 July letter recieved 21st May.

Hi,

 

My wife recieved Notice of Pre Trail review letter on Monday (21st May)-

 

TAKE NOTICE that the Pre Trial Review will take place on

 

30 July 2007 at 12:00PM

 

at Cambridge County Court, etc etc

 

When you should attend

 

Please note: This case may be released to another Judge, possibly at a different court.

 

So what do I do now;

 

I printed off most of the things from the court bundle as suggested except for the important bit the Lloyds T&C's. My wife opened her account when she was around 16 yrs of age, 12 years ago. We don't not have copies of letters or information regarding fee's for going over drawn.

 

Question is how do I get a copy of the T&C's way back to 1995 (or do I only need it from 2003 to 2005 as that the period when the charges were made) for the Lloyds SELECT ACCOUNT?

 

Also just to throw the spanners in the works, my wife's boss will not allow her time off to attend as other members of staff are off that day. I've always said I would claim on her behalf and therefor fight in court if need be, so is this a problem (I will also have my father with me as he is familiar with court proceedings, my father didn't seem to think it would be a problem)?

 

 

I need some advice please as what I should be doing now,

 

thanks

p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Do I need to get a copy of the T&C's for 1995 which is when my wife opened the Lloyds account or do I only need it from 2003 to 2005 as that the period when the charges were made to her account?

 

p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...