Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Improper repair caused collision?


whsa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6137 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We had our car mot'd by a national service centre a few weeks ago, the brake pads and discs needed to be replaced.

 

A few weeks later, under hard braking, the car wouldn't stop as quickly as it would have before the work and crashed into a fence (luckily it was on private land) though it has damaged the wheels, bumper and scratched the bodywork.

 

We noticed patches on the driveway which have turned out to be brake fluid and we've taken it to a different service centre to have the brakes looked at, turns out a nut wasn't tightened properly and the braking system was leaking fluid, which could have been a factor in the crash.

 

I don't quite know how to go about approaching the service centre about this, I feel they have some responsibility regarding the crash and in any case, their work, which we paid several hundred pounds for, was not up to standard.

 

Anyone have any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you paid "several hundred pounds" for disc and pad change, first ask the center that done the work for a detailed report of parts and labour costs and the work carried out.

 

Replacing an engine doesn't cost serveral hundred pounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you paid "several hundred pounds" for disc and pad change, first ask the center that done the work for a detailed report of parts and labour costs and the work carried out.

 

Replacing an engine doesn't cost serveral hundred pounds.

 

I have a quote for replacement of front pads and discs on my Jeep from the main dealer and it's £ 326 + VAT.

 

Presumably to do the rears as well, would be similar; so several hundred pounds is easily reached.

 

An acquaintance with a Mercedes C-class paid over £700 +VAT for his brake disks and pads.

 

BTW, a quote for replacing the engine on the Jeep was £ 4,500 + VAT. Luckily, I had only had the car 5 days, so the dealer got stuck with the cost of replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For rich and posh Pat.

 

It could be that the size and fitment and the number of vehicles on the road has an effect on the price.

As Jeep are a bit sparce on the road in the UK, ie millions of Ford Escorts, then you will probably only get parts to fit from the dealer.

It would not be worthwhile for companies such as Lucas or Lockhead to make parts that sell in very limited quantity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff and pat,

 

The front and rear discs and pads were replaced and came to around £300, plus the front suspension arms and rear bushs were replaced, it was around £600 total.

 

I think the quote was reasonably fair considering the scope of the work, my problem is with the brakes leaking and not working!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi whsa

 

Ok, if it's the fluid leak then you need to find out exactly where that leak is. It could be a coincidental leak and nothing to do with the work carried out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understand when Kwik fit did a brake check, I believe the leak was from the nut that connects the flexible hose with the brake pipe. The nut wasn't tight, so fluid was leaking out under braking.

 

Kwik fit did not do the original repair and are in no way responsible for the problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't really see a connection with changing discs and pads and the leak from the flexi and the bundy pipe joint. This should not have been loosened or removed as part of the change.

 

Also you should have been made aware that new pads require 'running in' and they wont give full efficiency until they are.

My personal feeling (without an engineers inspection and report) are that unless the fluid leak was great enough to allow a fair amount of fluid out through this leaking joint then any pedal pressure would allow the pedal to go to the floor (so giving forwarning) and not push the pistons.

If that was the case, then the leak would have been great enough to empty the system so braking was lost completely.

 

I think you will have a hard time proving your case, and I believe the onus is on you to prove and not the garage to disprove.

 

You can get free first consultation with solicitors, take them up on the offer and see what they have to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice conniff.

 

The pedal did drop to the floor when I braked hard, but not during normal driving. When I had it in Kwik Fit, the fluid was spurting out when it was pressed hard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must get a detailed report of the work carried out to assertain if they did indeed have to part this joint to work on the suspension. You could explain your story to a 'small' local garage and ask him if he thought they would part this joint or did they have to remove it to change it to your new suspension parts.

 

Whsa what make / model and year is it ? I will be able to have a better idea if I know the car personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason that I can think of as to why this joint would be disturbed is if the brake calliper was removed to work on the suspension (or perhaps free off sticky pistons in the calliper).

 

In either case, the brakes would have required bleeding afterwards and if the joint was in the state that it was spurting fluid, I can't see how this can have been done as they would never have got a 'firm' pedal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

You Don't Need To Take Of Any Brake Pipes Or Loosen Them To Change Discs & Parts Or To Do Suspension Work But If You Had A Piston Sticking In The Caliper & It Was Removed To Free It Of Then You Might Ave A Case

Link to post
Share on other sites

You Don't Need To Take Of Any Brake Pipes Or Loosen Them To Change Discs & Parts Or To Do Suspension Work But If You Had A Piston Sticking In The Caliper & It Was Removed To Free It Of Then You Might Ave A Case

 

Depends on the vehicle. In order to change the discs, the calliper will meed to be removed and this may entail disconnecting the brake pipes.

 

Also, it is not at all uncommon for brake pipes to have to be removed to allow removal of suspension parts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...