Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need A Confidence Booster


Makalu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks. We are at the Court stage with HSBC and just need a confidence booster as they have managed to drag this out incredibly well. We have today received a letter from the court stating that the case has been allocated to the small claims track (about £2700) and will be heard 10 Jul (why so flaming far away!!??) Each party needs to deliver documentation 14 days before and we need to pay another £100 fee by the 14 May or the case will be struck out. So here are the questions? At what stage are HSBC likely to throw in the towel? Can we increase our claim to ensure these additional charges are covered? What are they likely to do if they are so set on not actually appearing in court if they offer less beforehand and we say "bugger off, you have deliberatley messed us about so see you there"? The last one is unlikely I admit; once you take the frustration out you have to be sensible in terms of accepting the offer and then use the new template for claiming charges back when the bank had no intention of defending. Sorry to rant; getting wound up by these and LloydsTSB who are handbagging for Britain at the moment!! Thanks Makalu :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks. We are at the Court stage with HSBC and just need a confidence booster as they have managed to drag this out incredibly well. We have today received a letter from the court stating that the case has been allocated to the small claims track (about £2700) and will be heard 10 Jul (why so flaming far away!!??) Each party needs to deliver documentation 14 days before and we need to pay another £100 fee by the 14 May or the case will be struck out. So here are the questions? At what stage are HSBC likely to throw in the towel? There is no precise time scale M.... but you can be sure that it will be shortly before the hearing based on current experienceCan we increase our claim to ensure these additional charges are covered? My personal opinion is yes, you do include additional court charges, and the increase in interest amount if you are claiming interest up to date of settlement or court hearing. Did your original Partics of Claim and Schedules not point this out? What are they likely to do if they are so set on not actually appearing in court if they offer less beforehand and we say "bugger off, you have deliberatley messed us about so see you there"? It's a game of "chicken" Have a look at Bong's thread to familiarize yourself with how they play it The last one is unlikely I admit; once you take the frustration out you have to be sensible in terms of accepting the offer and then use the new template for claiming charges back when the bank had no intention of defending. Sorry to rant; getting wound up by these and Lloyds TSB who are handbagging for Britain at the moment!! Thanks Makalu :mad:

 

They will almost certainally make an offer. But if it is close to your request IMHO you cannot refuse it just for the pleasure of seeing them in court. The court would not accept that. They want things sorted without going to court, and if you refuse an offer of very, very close to your claim, you would be well advised to consider it very carefully.Your aim is (?) to get your money back, not see the b****rs squirm in court (unfortunately ! ) Just hold on in there

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to the bank yesterday and they showed me the full offer draft letter on the screen. I'm not sure if this is normal but....is it worth going to your branch, requesting a meeting with the manager or possibly some lower mortal, and asking them to check the details on your account and see if an offer letter has already been drafted?

 

Make them show you it on the screen.

 

If I hadn't been so shocked at this strange apparition of HSBC folding before a court date, I'd have taken a photo with my mobile! After all, it's my info about me - dunno what the data protection act says but hell!

 

There seem to be so many HSBC employees fed up with the company they work for, that at the very least you may be shown what it says in your folder about offers etc. Mine came up straight away in my account details at the bottom of the screen and the HSBC person was quite surprised that I had already started fighting back! Then I got to see all sorts on the system about my accounts - letters sent, phone calls etc etc. Fascinating!

Donation made 12/02/07 just cos being here is the best displacement activity I've had in years

 

 

The most useful post on the whole CAG site - find what you are looking for A-Z! http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/69359-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

strange isn't it skint... that they hold all this info on a screen about you, but when you ask for any statements beyond 6 years - they're struck dumb!!!!

 

thanks for the pm!! very interesting

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies everyone. I'll stick with it and it may well be worth a branch visit next week. Best wishes to all. Makalu

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...