Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amend Particulars of Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have received a General Form of Judgement or Order from the Court which states the following:

 

It is ordered that:

 

1 The claim be stayed as it makes no serious attempts to comply with CPR 16.4(1) by setting out a concise statement of the facts. (Stylised particulars do not constitute compliance). The claiment must amend or substitute its particulars of claim setting out the claimant's case in plain English by 4th May and in default the claim be struck out without further notice.

 

If the above order is complied with the Defendent has permission to file and serve an amended defence in accordance with CPR 16.5 setting out its case in plain English.

 

2 Claimant must also pay allocation fee of 100.00.

 

 

I cut and pasted Martin Lewis's particulars of claim on to the MCOL. It seems that where there was a comma or apostrophe etc, it has been autoformatted and appears as a ?? or @@? and I think this is what the court is asking me to amend.

 

I rang the court to see if there was a form that I needed to complete or do I just recomplete N1 but was told that they could not advise me. Now I am stuck! Do I just retype the partuclars on to A4 paper and take to the court or is there indeed a specific form? Also, as I am having to re submit my claim is it worth using CAG wording instead of Martin Lewis's. Can anyone help?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

I sent the full POC and paid the AQ fee of £100 as instructed. I had no response for ages as I think HSBC had a while to amend their defence which they did not do.

 

Anyway, I have now received the following from the court:

 

It is ordered that the claimant must amend or substitute the particulars of claim by setting out the case and by including details of the charges complained of, how they were calculated and in what circumstances they were incurred. The claimant should note that sending copy correspondence and or copies of bank statements will not suffice.

 

I have until tomorrow 4pm to comply or be struck out.

 

I am really stuck now, I feel like giving up! Can anyone help me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading that it seems to me like they do not have details of the charges. It also appears that he is asking how the charges are calculated, you cant provide this as the bank will not give you this information. You need to contact the court and ask them in plain English to explain what they want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly is wrong with Hitchin? 90% ofthe courts are accepting MCOL POC's

 

This is the fourth one this week,all the same, directed to submit amended POC's which they do and then have all been sent this direction

 

As far as I can tell only 1 submitted a SoC without the type of charge

 

I don't know what they actually want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do - they are not open until 10am Monday.

 

Just a thought, do you think it is because my description column on the SoC says 'total charges' (as it does on my statements when I am charged) and this doesn't actually show why I was charged i.e. for going over authrised overdraft?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh this might be part of it, in that case you need to inform the court that the defendant has not supplied this information to you. Ask the judge to order them to provide this information or strike their defence out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who are you claiming from ?

Will move this lot to your own thread in the bank group.;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

Just phoned the court and got put through to 'civil'. I asked them to explain exactly what they wanted me to provide and the woman basically just read out the order to me!:-|

 

I explained that I did not have access to information on how the charges are calculated and she advised me to write this in a cover letter.

 

What I have decided to do is submit the exact same POC again but I have amended the description column on the SOC to "unathorised overdraft fee" instead of "Total Charges" and hope this will answer their question "in what circumstances they were inccured". I have then requested in a covering letter that the Court orders the defendant to provide info on how their charges are calculated or their defence be struck out.

 

Does this sound okay or has anyone got any other suggestions? Bearing in mind this has to be in by 4pm today!!!!!!!!

 

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...